지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 대한외과학회 Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research Vol.102 No.4
- 발행연도
- 2022.4
- 수록면
- 234 - 240 (7page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Purpose: There are few reports on outcomes following surgical repair of recurrent rectal prolapse. The purpose of this study was to examine surgical outcomes for recurrent rectal prolapse.
Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study of patients who underwent surgery for recurrent rectal prolapse. This study used data collected by the Korean Anorectal Physiology and Pelvic Floor Disorder Study Group.
Results: A total of 166 patients who underwent surgery for recurrent rectal prolapse were registered retrospectively between 2011 and 2016 in 8 referral hospitals. Among them, 153 patients were finally enrolled, excluding 13 patients who were not followed up postoperatively. Median follow-up duration was 40 months (range, 0.2–129.3 months). Methods of surgical repair for recurrent rectal prolapse included perineal approach (n = 96) and abdominal approach (n = 57). Postoperative complications occurred in 16 patients (10.5%). There was no significant difference in complication rate between perineal and abdominal approach groups. While patients who underwent the perineal approach were older and more fragile, patients who underwent the abdominal approach had longer operation time and admission days (P < 0.05). Overall, 29 patients (19.0%) showed re-recurrence after surgery. Among variables, none affected the re-recurrence.
Conclusion: For the recurrent rectal prolapse, the perineal approach is used for the old and fragile patients. The postoperative complications and re-recurrence rate between perineal and abdominal approach were not different significantly. No factor including surgical method affected re-recurrence for recurrent rectal prolapse.
Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study of patients who underwent surgery for recurrent rectal prolapse. This study used data collected by the Korean Anorectal Physiology and Pelvic Floor Disorder Study Group.
Results: A total of 166 patients who underwent surgery for recurrent rectal prolapse were registered retrospectively between 2011 and 2016 in 8 referral hospitals. Among them, 153 patients were finally enrolled, excluding 13 patients who were not followed up postoperatively. Median follow-up duration was 40 months (range, 0.2–129.3 months). Methods of surgical repair for recurrent rectal prolapse included perineal approach (n = 96) and abdominal approach (n = 57). Postoperative complications occurred in 16 patients (10.5%). There was no significant difference in complication rate between perineal and abdominal approach groups. While patients who underwent the perineal approach were older and more fragile, patients who underwent the abdominal approach had longer operation time and admission days (P < 0.05). Overall, 29 patients (19.0%) showed re-recurrence after surgery. Among variables, none affected the re-recurrence.
Conclusion: For the recurrent rectal prolapse, the perineal approach is used for the old and fragile patients. The postoperative complications and re-recurrence rate between perineal and abdominal approach were not different significantly. No factor including surgical method affected re-recurrence for recurrent rectal prolapse.
목차
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Comparison of abdominal and perineal approach for recurrent rectal prolapse
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2023 .03
-
[Colorectal] Recurrent Rectal Prolapse Surgical Management: A Single Center Retrospective Study
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2022 .11
-
Laparoscopic Approach for Rectal Prolapse
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2019 .10
-
The role of rectal redundancy in the pathophysiology of rectal prolapse: a pilot study
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2022 .05
-
Neorectal Mucosal Prolapse After Intersphincteric Resection for Low-Lying Rectal Cancer: A Case Report
Annals of Coloproctology
2021 .01
-
Pelvic Floor Disorder (Incontinence, Rectal Prolapse)
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2016 .11
-
Pelvic Floor Disorder
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2015 .11
-
Treatment of recurrence after local excision of rectal cancer
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2019 .10
-
A Comparative Study between Transanal and Transabdominal Approaches in Treatment of Complete Rectal Prolapse
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2022 .11
-
Recurrent Spinal Giant Cell Tumors: A Study of Risk Factors and Recurrence Patterns
Asian Spine Journal
2016 .01
-
Solitary Recurrence of Rectal Carcinoma at Anterior Abdominal Wall: Report of a Case
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2019 .10
-
Surgical treatments for vaginal apical prolapse
Obstetrics & Gynecology Science
2016 .01
-
A Comparative Study on Surgical Option of Male Rectal Prolapse
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2021 .05
-
Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery for Patients With Rectal Tumors: A Single Institution’s Experience
Annals of Coloproctology
2017 .01
-
Efficacy and safety of anal encirclement combining the Leeds-Keio artificial ligament with injection sclerotherapy using aluminum potassium sulfate and tannic acid in the management of rectal prolapse: a single-center observational study
Annals of Coloproctology
2023 .06
-
Robotic Rectal Cancer Surgery
대한임상종양학회 학술대회지
2016 .02
-
Laparoscopic Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2020 .11
-
Risk factors of recurrence in TNM stage I colorectal cancer
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2023 .05
-
Local Recurrence after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy And Rectal Excision in Rectal Cancer Patients When The Distal Resection Margin Is Compromised
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2020 .11
-
Differences in Prognostic Factors between Early and Late Recurrence Breast Cancers
Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP
2015 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2023-514-000221460