지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 대한외과학회 Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research Vol.104 No.3
- 발행연도
- 2023.3
- 수록면
- 150 - 155 (6page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Purpose: Rectal prolapse is a benign disease in which the rectum protrudes below the anus. Although many studies have been reported on the treatment of primary rectal prolapse for many years, there is a lack of treatment or clinical research results on recurrent rectal prolapse. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of surgical approaches for recurrent rectal prolapse.
Methods: We studied patients who underwent surgical treatment for recurrent rectal prolapse disease from March 2016 to February 2021. We analyzed the previous operation methods in patients with recurrent rectal prolapse, as well as the operation time, complication rate, hospital stay, and re-recurrence rates in the perineal and abdominal approach groups.
Results: Out of a total of 239 patients, 41 patients who underwent surgery for recurrent rectal prolapse were retrospectively enrolled. Recurrent rectal prolapses were surgically treated either by the perineal approach (n = 25, 61.0%) or by the abdominal approach (n = 16, 39.0%). The operation times were significantly longer in the abdominal approach than in the perineal approach (98.44 minutes vs. 58.00 minutes, P = 0.001). Hospital stay was significantly longer in the abdominal approach than in the perineal approach (9.19 days vs. 6.00 days, P = 0.012). Re-recurrence rate after repeat repair was not significantly different between the 2 groups (P = 0.777).
Conclusion: Although the perineal approach shortened the operation time and hospital stay, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups in postoperative complications and re-recurrence rate. Both approaches can be good surgical options for the treatment of recurrent rectal prolapse.
Methods: We studied patients who underwent surgical treatment for recurrent rectal prolapse disease from March 2016 to February 2021. We analyzed the previous operation methods in patients with recurrent rectal prolapse, as well as the operation time, complication rate, hospital stay, and re-recurrence rates in the perineal and abdominal approach groups.
Results: Out of a total of 239 patients, 41 patients who underwent surgery for recurrent rectal prolapse were retrospectively enrolled. Recurrent rectal prolapses were surgically treated either by the perineal approach (n = 25, 61.0%) or by the abdominal approach (n = 16, 39.0%). The operation times were significantly longer in the abdominal approach than in the perineal approach (98.44 minutes vs. 58.00 minutes, P = 0.001). Hospital stay was significantly longer in the abdominal approach than in the perineal approach (9.19 days vs. 6.00 days, P = 0.012). Re-recurrence rate after repeat repair was not significantly different between the 2 groups (P = 0.777).
Conclusion: Although the perineal approach shortened the operation time and hospital stay, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups in postoperative complications and re-recurrence rate. Both approaches can be good surgical options for the treatment of recurrent rectal prolapse.
목차
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Clinical outcomes of surgical management for recurrent rectal prolapse: a multicenter retrospective study
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2022 .04
-
Laparoscopic Approach for Rectal Prolapse
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2019 .10
-
The role of rectal redundancy in the pathophysiology of rectal prolapse: a pilot study
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2022 .05
-
A Comparative Study on Surgical Option of Male Rectal Prolapse
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2021 .05
-
[Colorectal] Recurrent Rectal Prolapse Surgical Management: A Single Center Retrospective Study
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2022 .11
-
Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial on the Efficacy of Hyaluronidase in Preventing Perineal Trauma in Nulliparous Women
Yonsei Medical Journal
2020 .01
-
A Comparative Study between Transanal and Transabdominal Approaches in Treatment of Complete Rectal Prolapse
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2022 .11
-
Neorectal Mucosal Prolapse After Intersphincteric Resection for Low-Lying Rectal Cancer: A Case Report
Annals of Coloproctology
2021 .01
-
Pelvic Floor Disorder (Incontinence, Rectal Prolapse)
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2016 .11
-
Pelvic Floor Disorder
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2015 .11
-
Outcomes of Laparoscopic Abdominoperineal Resection in Low Rectal Cancer Using Different Pelvic Drainages
Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP
2015 .01
-
Solitary Recurrence of Rectal Carcinoma at Anterior Abdominal Wall: Report of a Case
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2019 .10
-
Complex Obstetric Perineal Injury Reconstruction Using Antropyloric Valve Transposition
Annals of Coloproctology
2020 .01
-
Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery for Patients With Rectal Tumors: A Single Institution’s Experience
Annals of Coloproctology
2017 .01
-
Comparison of Delorme-Thiersch Operation Outcomes in Men and Women With Rectal Prolapse
Annals of Coloproctology
2019 .01
-
Treatment of recurrence after local excision of rectal cancer
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2019 .10
-
Surgical treatments for vaginal apical prolapse
Obstetrics & Gynecology Science
2016 .01
-
Reconstruction of Large Defects in the Perineal Area Using Multiple Perforator Flaps
Archives of plastic surgery : APS
2016 .01
-
Clinical effectiveness of omental transposition in facilitating perineal wound healing after abdominoperineal resection: a systematic review
Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science
2021 .01
-
샅의 층 구조 이해를 돕기 위한 교육용 일러스트레이션 연구
해부·생물인류학
2023 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2023-514-000430045