메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
송정수 (중앙대학교)
저널정보
한국러시아문학회 러시아어문학연구논집 러시아어문학연구논집 제79호
발행연도
2022.11
수록면
55 - 90 (36page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study examines the “exaggerated aestheticization” regarding the Soviet era observed in the works of conceptualist poets such as Timur Kibirov, Dmitry Prigov, Lev Rubinstein, and so on. By summoning the “mythical history” surrounding them, that is, the “created history” and the “processed history” beyond the actual history, it performs the function of a pseudo-nostalgic narrative about the absent utopia. At this time, attention should be paid to the fact that the Soviet myth, as a kind of childhood sign used by these conceptualist poets, is contrived and distorted as the false sign produced by socialist realism. The pseudo-nostalgic narrative strategy used by conceptual artists who spent their childhood in the Stalin era is the foundation for the “non-existence” of what is viewed as “probable” and the exposure of its “absence.” On the other hand, conceptualist poets often expose a dual perspective on the narrative object and its implications by using the poetics of quotation along with this pseudo-nostalgic narrative strategy. This tendency is especially noticeable in the poems of Timur Kibirov and Dmitry Prigov. Kibirov adopts a method of exposing the absent utopia through the juxtaposition between the historical past and the pseudo-nostalgic narrative of the absent past constructed based on “made-up memories.” In addition, in Kibirov’s works, objects depicted in a more beautified or exaggerated form different from their actual appearance are often placed together with quotations from various literary works. At this time, the quotation inserted in a completely different context from the meaning of the original text becomes an excellent strategic tool to reveal the untruth and falsehood of the subject of description. Conversely, Prigov satirizes the unproductiveness and ritualized daily life of Soviet society by producing and repeating numerous variations of the original sources, borrowing mainly standardized government agency document forms and public documents as original texts. Furthermore, the poetics of quotation in Prigov’s work do not aim at directly targeting and exposing any particular situation in the past. Rather, it parodies the “empty signs” of Soviet society by using specific language or borrowing standardized text forms that dominated Soviet society. For this reason, the poetics of quotation, which conceptual poets enjoy using, do not work at all for readers who lack reading and understanding of the original text that appears in an inflected form in the quotation. This characteristic expands to the problem of the author and the reader as a second author; it serves as another reference point to classify the works of conceptual artists as the beginning of Russian postmodernism or its affiliated works. Therefore, this study pays special attention to the pseudo-nostalgic narrative strategy and poetics of quotation, which are commonly found in the creations of T. Kibirov and D. Prigov, the conceptual poets representing modern Russian literature, and how these are embodied in the creations of the two poets. We also analyze the history artificially processed in the Soviet era in the works of these poets and the method of representation of “absent utopia.” Furthermore, we examine the way these poets parody the “empty” symbols of Soviet society by borrowing various literary works and forms of documents from government agencies.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0