메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Shivanand Bomman (Digestive Disease Institute Virginia Mason Medical Center Seattle WA USA) Munish Ashat (Indiana University Health Indianapolis IN USA) Navroop Nagra (Digestive Disease Institute, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA) Mahendran Jayaraj (University of Nevada Las Vegas NV USA) Shruti Chandra (Mayo Clinic Rochester MN USA) Richard A Kozarek (Digestive Disease Institute, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA) Andrew Ross (Digestive Disease Institute, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA) Rajesh Krishnamoorthi (Digestive Disease Institute, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA)
저널정보
대한소화기내시경학회 Clinical Endoscopy Clinical Endoscopy 제55권 제1호
발행연도
2022.1
수록면
33 - 40 (8page)
DOI
10.5946/ce.2021.212

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Background/Aims: Multiple outbreaks of multidrug-resistant organisms have been reported worldwide due to contaminatedduodenoscopes. In 2015, the United States Food and Drug Administration recommended the following supplemental enhancedsurveillance and reprocessing techniques (ESRT) to improve duodenoscope disinfection: (1) microbiological culture, (2) ethyleneoxide sterilization, (3) liquid chemical sterilant processing system, and (4) double high-level disinfection. A systematic review andmeta-analysis was performed to assess the impact of ESRT on the contamination rates. Methods: A thorough and systematic search was performed across several databases and conference proceedings from inceptionuntil January 2021, and all studies reporting the effectiveness of various ESRTs were identified. The pooled contamination rates ofpost-ESRT duodenoscopes were estimated using the random effects model. Results: A total of seven studies using various ESRTs were incorporated in the analysis, which included a total of 9,084 post-ESRTduodenoscope cultures. The pooled contamination rate of the post-ESRT duodenoscope was 5% (95% confidence interval [CI]:2.3%–10.8%, inconsistency index [I2]=97.97%). Pooled contamination rates for high-risk organisms were 0.8% (95% CI: 0.2%–2.7%,I2=94.96). Conclusions: While ESRT may improve the disinfection process, a post-ESRT contamination rate of 5% is not negligible. Ongoingefforts to mitigate the rate of contamination by improving disinfection techniques and innovations in duodenoscope design toimprove safety are warranted.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0