메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Takafumi Mie (Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research Tokyo Japan) Takashi Sasaki (Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research Tokyo Japan) Ryo Kanata (Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research Tokyo Japan) Takaaki Furukawa (Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research Tokyo Japan) Tsuyoshi Takeda (Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research Tokyo Japan) Akiyoshi Kasuga (Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research Tokyo Japan) Masato Matsuyama (Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research Tokyo Japan) Masato Ozaka (Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research Tokyo Japan) Naoki Sasahira (Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research Tokyo Japan)
저널정보
대한소화기내시경학회 Clinical Endoscopy Clinical Endoscopy 제54권 제5호
발행연도
2021.9
수록면
730 - 738 (9page)
DOI
10.5946/ce.2020.251

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Background/Aims: Several fine-needle biopsy (FNB) needles are available for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided tissueacquisition. However, there is disagreement on which type of needle has the best diagnostic yield. The aim of this study was tocompare the performance and safety of two commonly used EUS-FNB needles. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients who underwent EUS-FNB between June 2016 and March 2020 in ourhospital. Two types of needles were evaluated: a 20-gauge Menghini needle with a lateral forward bevel and a 22-gauge Franseenneedle. Rapid on-site evaluation was performed in all the cases. A multivariate analysis was performed to clarify the negativepredictive factors for obtaining a histological diagnosis. Propensity score matching was performed to compare the diagnostic yieldsof these two needles. Results: We analyzed 666 patients and 690 lesions. The overall diagnostic rate of histology alone was 88.8%, and the overall adverseevent rate was 1.5%. Transduodenal access and small lesions (≤2 cm) were identified as negative predictive factors for obtaining ahistological diagnosis. After propensity score matching, 482 lesions were analyzed. The diagnostic accuracy rates of histology in theM and F needle groups were 89.2% and 88.8%, respectively (p=1.00). Conclusions: Both the needles showed high diagnostic yield, and no significant difference in performance was observed between thetwo.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (38)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0