메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
조찬희 (한성대학교) 이형용 (한성대학교)
저널정보
한국경영과학회 경영과학 經營科學 第40卷 第2號
발행연도
2023.6
수록면
77 - 95 (19page)
DOI
10.7737/KMSR.2023.40.2.077

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (4)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
ESG management to reduce greenhouse gases is recognized as an important strategy for corporate management. However, studies on TCFD scores and corporate efficiency on the subject of greenhouse gases (GHG) were rare in Korea. Therefore, in this study, the level of greenhouse gas reduction implementation of 84 securities-listed companies that released sustainability management reports was evaluated using the evaluation criteria of the K-ESG guidelines. In addition, the target companies were divided into non-financial general companies, non-financial public companies, and financial companies, and the efficiency of each group was compared using a meta frontier with TCFD scores and ESG scores set as input and output variables. As a result of the study, first, the greenhouse gas implementation rate is 57%. Second, the greenhouse gas implementation rate of financial companies was 62%, which was relatively good compared to 56% of non-financial companies. Third, the order of meta-frontier efficiency under VRS was financial companies (96%), non-financial general companies (94.9%), and non-financial public companies (94%), but there was no statistically significant difference in average value. Fourth, as a cause of inefficiency, scale inefficiency was high in financial companies and pure technology inefficiency was high in non-financial companies. As a contribution point of this study, first, an approach to measure TCFD scores using K-ESG guidelines was introduced to companies. Second, the efficiency of financial companies with high TCFD scores was higher than that of non-financial companies, implying that non-financial companies should be more active in reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

목차

Abstract
1. 서론
2. 선행 연구
3. 연구방법론
4. 실증 분석
5. 논의, 시사점 및 한계점
6. 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0102-2023-325-001743048