메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Kim, Ji Yeon (Seoul National University) Park, Chae Yeon (National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST)) Huh, Ju Young (National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST)) Hyun, Jung Hee (International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)) Lee, Dong Kun (Seoul National University)
저널정보
한국기후변화학회 한국기후변화학회지 Journal of Climate Change Research Vol.14 No.3
발행연도
2023.6
수록면
219 - 239 (21page)
DOI
10.15531/ksccr.2023.14.3.219

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The complexity and uncertainty of climate change and differing stakeholder interests present substantial challenges to prioritization in adaptation strategies. Given that priorities can vary widely based on stakeholder composition and the selected adaptation measures, decision-making methodologies must possess the flexibility to accommodate these differences. With its multidisciplinary nature and diverse stakeholder involvement, water resources management requires comprehensive and integrated methods for rational priority-setting. This study assembled expert groups, including municipalities and civic organizations, to form a governance system. Trustworthy adaptation policy priorities were subsequently derived from this governance system"s evaluation results. Recognizing that priority outcomes may differ across groups, we applied the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) method. The application of TOPSIS within governance offers a variety of flexible priority options, surpassing the limitations of a single top priority, and allows decision-makers to adapt their choices to both national and local contexts. While survey-derived priorities may differ based on stakeholder composition, this approach allows for developing plans that reflect the urgency of regionally tailored policies. Our findings offer a foundation for understanding each priority"s significance.

목차

ABSTRACT
1. Introduction
2. Material and methods
3. Results
4. Discussions
5. Conclusion
References

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0