메뉴 건너뛰기
Library Notice
Institutional Access
If you certify, you can access the articles for free.
Check out your institutions.
ex)Hankuk University, Nuri Motors
Log in Register Help KOR
Subject

Art History of Korea and China in the Modern Era : Focused on Ko Yuseop and Teng Gu
Recommendations
Search
Questions

근대기 한국과 중국의 미술사 서술 : 고유섭(高裕燮)과 텅구(滕固)를 중심으로

논문 기본 정보

Type
Academic journal
Author
Jung, Soojin (전남대학교)
Journal
Center for Art Studies, Korea Art History Forum Vol.56 KCI Accredited Journals
Published
2023.6
Pages
7 - 32 (26page)
DOI
10.14380/AHF.2023.56.7

Usage

cover
📌
Topic
📖
Background
🔬
Method
🏆
Result
Art History of Korea and China in the Modern Era : Focused on Ko Yuseop and Teng Gu
Ask AI
Recommendations
Search
Questions

Abstract· Keywords

Report Errors
Ko Yuseop and Teng Gu are representative scholars who established their own nation’s art history in the historiography of art in Korea and China. They analyzed the various fields such as architecture, painting, sculpture, and ceramics with in-depth insights to lay the foundation for art history in both countries. However, their academic achievements reflected the ideological character of Japanese academia, which was accepted and previously transformed on the basis of Western ideas.
These two scholars accepted Western philosophy and historical research methodologies of the 19th century and studied their own aesthetics with the theories of Neo-Kantian school. They were absorbed in the cultural history of the Neo-Kantian school and tried to identify the aesthetic characteristics of their nation’s art based on this theory. But accordingly, their results were biased or restricted to the use of conceptual terms. They also established their nation’s own art history based on methodologies of Wölfflin and Riegl. However, it did not get close enough to Wölfflin’s basic intention to extract the spirit of the time (Zeitgeist) from the style. In addition, they described art history as evolutionary and saw Buddhism as the core of culture, but this was the perspective of the Japanese government-manufactured art history, which focused on antiquity. And it is criticized for not overcoming colonial frame.
However, Ko Yuseop and Teng Gu each established the initial art history in their own country and contributed towards the construction of a nation state which was the main task of the modern era. They performed the difficult task of highlighting the uniqueness of tradition while building their own art history based on West centric, modern universality. However, the limitations of the times in the early 20th century made it impossible to separate modernity and coloniality from their academic achievements. It is because researchers are epistemological beings who are unable to empty themselves totally to access research subjects, and are subject to epistemological constraints of the time
After the death of the two scholars, the art history of nationalism and the materialistic art history of Marxism appeared in Korea and China. And since the 1960s in Korea and after the 1980s in China, the art history of intrinsic development led the research climate. This development of art history was possible based on the early achievements made by the two scholars. In short, Ko Yuseop and Teng Gu can be said to be researchers who laid the foundation for East Asian art history.

Contents

Ⅰ. 고유섭과 텅구: 한국과 중국 미술사학의 개척자
Ⅱ. 20세기 초반 한국과 중국 미술사 연구의 토대
Ⅲ. 신칸트학파 영향의 미학 연구
Ⅳ. 양식사적 방법론의 미술사 서술
Ⅴ. 문화전파에 대한 관점과 진화론적 사관( 史觀)
Ⅵ. 맺음말
참고문헌
ABSTRACT

References (0)

Add References

Recommendations

It is an article recommended by DBpia according to the article similarity. Check out the related articles!

Related Authors

Frequently Viewed Together

Recently viewed articles

Comments(0)

0

Write first comments.

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0102-2023-650-001722096