메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김종원 (미들섹스대학교)
저널정보
한국체육과학회 한국체육과학회지 한국체육과학회지 제32권 제5호 (자연과학 편)
발행연도
2023.10
수록면
859 - 868 (10page)
DOI
10.35159/kjss.2023.10.32.5.859

이용수

DBpia Top 5%동일한 주제분류 기준으로
최근 2년간 이용수 순으로 정렬했을 때
해당 논문이 위치하는 상위 비율을 의미합니다.
표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The aim of this study was to identify relativity between teams using different formations in football matches. A total of 380 matches in the English Premier League (EPL) during 2022/2023 season was investigated. The type of formation and team quality were set as independent variables, and the results of the matches were set as dependent variables. There were a total of 19 formation types from 380 matches (760 teams). Among them, the most used formation was the 4-2-3-1 (34.3%) formation, followed by the 4-3-3 (29.2%) formation. 79.4% of the total formation was 4 backs, followed by 3 backs (17.6%) and 5 backs (3%). By team, Chelsea used the most diverse formation in one season (n=38 matches), with a total of 10 formation, while Arsenal, Fulham and Newcastle used only one formation in whole season. The 4-3-3 formation had the highest winning rate, and the 3-4-2-1 formation had the lowest winning rate. Considering the team quality, the winning rate of the strong team using 4 backs and 1 tops was the highest, and the winning rate of the weak team using 4 backs and 2 tops was the lowest. As a result of examining the relativity between formations, the team using the 4 backs and 3 tops had the highest winning rate against the team using the 4 backs and 1 top, while the team with the 4 backs and 1 top had the lowest winning rate against the 4 backs and 3 tops. This result is believed to be used as basic data for coaches who analyze the formation of the opposing team in applied world and academic areas that conduct formation research in the future.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 연구방법
Ⅲ. 결과
Ⅳ. 논의
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-24-02-088335295