지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
ECM subjects in Korean appear on CPs, which raise some non-trivial theory internal issues in the generative grammar framework regarding the Phase impenetrability condition (PIC) and/or the Chain Condition. These issues have been noted many times in the previous literature (Yang 2002, 2003, Kim & Kim 2002, 2003, Yoon 2003, Hong 2014, Park 2018, among others). As such, many analyses have been proposed to solve these issues, all with their own merits and disadvantages. This paper is another attempt at providing a unified analysis of how Korean ECM constructions are able to nullify the apparent violation of PIC and/or Chian Condition, as well as how and why Korean ECM constructions are different (or similar) from other ECM constructions. We argue that ECM subjects in Korean are aboutness topics base-generated at [Spec, CP] and that only unaccusative subjects can appear as ECM subjects as they do not receive the Nominative case during the derivation. Some immediate consequences of this proposals are that ECM subjects should be allowed with unergative and transitive subjects of non-finite clauses as they cannot assign the Nominative case within the embedded clause and that aboutness topics appearing in the left periphery of embedded CPs should be accessible to the matrix syntactic operations in other languages as well. We show that subjects of transitive and unergative predicates can appear as ECM subjects of non-finite embedded clauses in English and that aboutness topics of Puyuma, base-generated at the left periphery of the embedded CP are also accessible to matrix syntactic operations.
목차
1. Introduction
2. Characteristics of Korean ECM constructions
3. Previous research
4. ECM subjects as aboutness topics
5. Categorial subject vs. Thetic subject
6. Cross-linguistical variation
7. Conclusion
References
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Optional Raising in ECM and Labeling of XP-YP
생성문법연구
2019 .01
-
A Non-raising Approach to Matrix Object in Korean ECM Constructions
영어영문학연구
2022 .12
-
비정형절의 주어: 타동사 결과구문과 예외격표시구문을 중심으로
언어학 연구
2023 .07
-
A Family of Topic Constructions in Korean: A Construction-based Analysis
언어와 정보
2016 .02
-
Remarks on the Predicate Analysis of CP
생성문법연구
2021 .11
-
On Mixed Clausal Coordinations: Coordinating Finite CPs, ECM and Control Infinitive
현대문법연구
2018 .01
-
한국어의 주제
한국어학
2021 .05
-
또 하나의 주어: 한국어 이중 주어 구문
현대문법연구
2018 .01
-
Idiomatic Complement and Null pro Subject
언어과학
2017 .01
-
事件域認知模型(ECM)視角下的反義複合詞內部語義屬性研究
중국언어연구
2022 .06
-
Not all CPs Are Phases!
생성문법연구
2018 .01
-
Extra-linguistic knowledge and Pragmatics in the Interpretation of Korean Relative Clauses
언어와 정보사회
2021 .11
-
서술절에 대한 재고찰 - 내포절 체계 내의 다른 절과의 변별을 중심으로 -
한말연구
2017 .01
-
Sentential Subjects Revisited
새한영어영문학
2015 .02
-
Against a Topic-Comment Analysis of So-called Double/Multiple Nominative/Subject Constructions in Korean
언어
2023 .09
-
영어 소절 내 Null BE에 대한 제고
언어학연구
2019 .01
-
Two Types of Exceptional Case Marking Constructions
생성문법연구
2018 .01
-
Complementation in Korean: Implications for Case, Labeling, and Ellipsis
현대문법연구
2016 .01
-
한국어와 중국어의 주어와 화제에 대하여
이중언어학
2016 .01
-
PRO and pro : With Reference to Idioms
영어영문학
2016 .11
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-24-02-089263627