지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The content of this article can be summarized as follows:
First, in the case of fines during the Qin-Han period, there is a high likelihood that the three-tier system of [貲1盾] - [貲1甲] - [貲2甲] was directly inherited and transformed into the [罰金1兩] - [罰金2兩] - [罰金4兩] system. Regarding retribution (贖刑), during the transition from the Qin to the Han Dynasty, it is highly likely that the grades and amounts of retribution money (贖錢) were adjusted.
Second, among various penalty names included in retribution (贖刑), 贖耐 and 贖黥 appear to have evolved from characteristics of alternative penalties to those of primary punishments since the Qin period. In particular, 贖耐刑 was a unique form of retribution that was almost perfectly characterized as a primary punishment during the Qin-Han period. However, other retribution penalties such as 贖死, 贖城旦舂, 贖宮, and 贖遷 retained stronger characteristics of alternative penalties rather than primary punishments until the middle of the Western Han Dynasty.
Third, after the legal reform initiated during the reign of Emperor Wen of the Western Han Dynasty, the amounts of retribution money (贖錢) were recorded in the format of “罰金~兩,” which might give the impression that retribution and fines were integrated. However, this format arose due to the abolition of corporal punishment and the introduction of penal servitude, making it difficult to use retribution names as they were. The distinction between retribution and fines continued to exist even until the Wei-Jin period.
Fourth, after the legal reform, it is likely that the daily wage standards for penal servitude to replace the repayment of fines and retribution money (贖錢) had to change. Generally, it is believed that the penal servitude equivalent to the 贖耐 penalty of 罰金12兩 was kept within one year, calculated based on a daily wage of 22~25 coins, in order to maintain a balance of penalties in the overall legal system.
First, in the case of fines during the Qin-Han period, there is a high likelihood that the three-tier system of [貲1盾] - [貲1甲] - [貲2甲] was directly inherited and transformed into the [罰金1兩] - [罰金2兩] - [罰金4兩] system. Regarding retribution (贖刑), during the transition from the Qin to the Han Dynasty, it is highly likely that the grades and amounts of retribution money (贖錢) were adjusted.
Second, among various penalty names included in retribution (贖刑), 贖耐 and 贖黥 appear to have evolved from characteristics of alternative penalties to those of primary punishments since the Qin period. In particular, 贖耐刑 was a unique form of retribution that was almost perfectly characterized as a primary punishment during the Qin-Han period. However, other retribution penalties such as 贖死, 贖城旦舂, 贖宮, and 贖遷 retained stronger characteristics of alternative penalties rather than primary punishments until the middle of the Western Han Dynasty.
Third, after the legal reform initiated during the reign of Emperor Wen of the Western Han Dynasty, the amounts of retribution money (贖錢) were recorded in the format of “罰金~兩,” which might give the impression that retribution and fines were integrated. However, this format arose due to the abolition of corporal punishment and the introduction of penal servitude, making it difficult to use retribution names as they were. The distinction between retribution and fines continued to exist even until the Wei-Jin period.
Fourth, after the legal reform, it is likely that the daily wage standards for penal servitude to replace the repayment of fines and retribution money (贖錢) had to change. Generally, it is believed that the penal servitude equivalent to the 贖耐 penalty of 罰金12兩 was kept within one year, calculated based on a daily wage of 22~25 coins, in order to maintain a balance of penalties in the overall legal system.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 秦漢代의 贖刑·罰金刑 등급 체계
Ⅲ. 刑制개혁과 贖刑의 변화
Ⅳ. 漢代 罰金刑과 居罰贖債
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
漢文帝 刑制改革과 刑罰制度의 變化 - 『荊州胡家草場西漢簡牘』자료를 중심으로 -
동서인문
2022 .04
-
秦代의 罰金刑과 贖刑
중국사연구
2016 .01
-
漢初 律典의 律名體系와 刑罰體系의 變化 － 『胡家草場漢簡』 律令簡을 중심으로 －
동서인문
2023 .04
-
秦에서 漢으로의 罰金刑과 贖刑의 變化와 그 性格
동양사학연구
2016 .03
-
中國 刑罰體系의 變遷 -특히 ‘自由刑’의 발달(仁井田陞)
신라사학보
2016 .04
-
遷刑에서 流刑으로 - 중국 고대 유배형의 변천과 특징 -
중국사연구
2023 .04
-
秦·漢 시기의 贖刑·罰金刑
중국사연구
2024 .07
-
明代의 贖刑主義와 充軍의 팽창
중국사연구
2023 .02
-
이숙에 대한 『유가사지론』 입장: 『유식삼십송』의 이숙설과의 관계 중심으로
불교문예연구
2021 .12
-
蔡沈의 刑罰考證 立論
민족문화
2016 .06
-
秦漢 遷律의 성립과 폐지
중국사연구
2022 .12
-
秦時“癘者”的刑罰探析與當代價值 ——以睡虎地秦簡為中心
중국사연구
2022 .10
-
사형제도의 윤리적 정당성 : 사형에 대한 응보론적 논증을 중심으로
철학연구
2018 .02
-
淸代 笞杖刑의 집행과 죄인의 사망
동양사학연구
2023 .03
-
AI와 로봇이 연루된 사건에서 인간을 비난할 수 없는가?: 응보 간극 논변에 대한 비판적 고찰
철학연구
2024 .12
-
청대 몽골민족의 벌축형(罚畜刑)에 관한 고찰
한중관계연구
2024 .02
-
환생복수서사의 허구적 진실과 소설의 윤리－≪태평광기≫ ‘보응편’을 중심으로－
중국어문학
2020 .01
-
진(秦)·한초(漢初) 사면(赦免)대상 확대 양상과 한문제(漢文帝) 형법개혁
인문논총
2023 .05
-
『書經』 刑 개념에 관한 正祖의 이해와 적용
양명학
2022 .06
-
한반도 사드 배치 결정에 따른 중국 여우커(游客)의 한국 유입실태 및 전망 고찰
중국문화연구
2018 .05
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0