지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Purpose: The study aims to investigate the extent to which these military entities, the ROK Army (ROKA) and the Japan Self Defense Forces (JSDF) perceive humanitarian norms and operational guidelines as accountable humanitarian actors.
Originality: Given that the role of military in offshore humanitarian action has become both prominent and complex, understanding the sensitization of these organizations to key humanitarian principles is a critical facet of assessing their capacity to engage in relief operations in an ethical and legitimate manner.
Methodology: The survey with structured questionnaires was administered to 104 officers from the ROKA and 101 veteran officers from the JSDF including focus group interviews. Independent sample t-tests were conducted to identify differences in perceptions between the two groups, utilizing SPSS 25 as the analytical tool.
Result: Both the ROKA and the JSDF demonstrated a relatively high level of awareness and commitment to humanitarian principles, though variations in perception were observed. Notably, differences emerged in their perceptions of guidelines for the use of military assets in humanitarian operations, with the ROKA exhibiting a comparatively higher level of perception in certain areas. The JSDF, on the other hand, showed higher levels of perception regarding the impacts of complex humanitarian emergencies, particularly natural disasters.
Conclusions and Implication: These findings underscore the need for tailored training of humanitarian action, and transparent communication and coordination strategies with civilian agencies to enhance their effectiveness in addressing humanitarian crises in fragile contexts.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
The United Nations Humanitarian Interventions: Selected Humanitarian Crisis in 1989-2014: Why Do Some Humanitarian Crisis Cases Not Experience UN Humanitarian Intervention?
동북아연구(구 통일문제연구)
2020 .01
-
‘인도적 지원’(humanitarian assistance)에 있어서의 국제입법 동향 및 주요 쟁점
국제법평론
2015 .01
-
China’s Humanitarian Aid and Efforts to Engage in International Humanitarian Assistance
Journal of Global and Area Studies
2021 .01
-
근거이론에 기초한 인도주의 리더십 실천 경험에 대한 다면적 영향요인 분석
교육혁신연구
2021 .09
-
대북 제재가 인도주의 활동에 미치는 영향
문화와 정치
2021 .03
-
국제인도법의 이행 확보 메커니즘
국제법평론
2021 .10
-
Civilian Aid Workers from Venus and Military from Mars in Humanitarian Response to Complex Emergencies in DPRK: Perception Gap of Humanitarian Crisis and Relief Operations
The Korean Journal of Security Affairs
2021 .01
-
Performance indicators for humanitarian relief logistics in Taiwan
The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics
2022 .09
-
아․태 지역 내 인도적 지원 작전에 대한 민군행위자의 상호지향성 연구: 인도주의 규범 및 피해심각성의 인식을 중심으로
국방연구
2020 .01
-
유럽연합의 보호책임원칙 논의와 인도적 지원 매커니즘: 미얀마 사례를 중심으로
유럽연구
2021 .08
-
From Humanitarian Relief to Democracy Aid: US Foreign Assistance Towards North Korea, 1996–2016
Pacific Focus
2020 .01
-
A Study on the Correlation Between Sanctions and Humanitarian Situation: Did Sanctions Lead to the Crisis in North Korea?
Pacific Focus
2024 .04
-
The EU’s Policy towards North Korea: Experiment of Engagement and Supporting Humanitarian Security
평화학연구
2016 .06
-
제네바협약 추가의정서 40년과 민간인 보호의 실효성 : 전시 반인도적 범죄의 처벌과 ‘인도적 개입’을 중심으로
인도법논총
2017 .12
-
Strategic Logistics Outsourcing in Humanitarian Supply Chain: A Fuzzy AHP Approach
로지스틱스연구
2018 .01
-
우크라이나 전쟁을 통해 본 전쟁범죄의 윤리적 딜레마 연구 - 국제인도법 이행의 문제를 중심으로 -
도덕윤리과교육
2023 .11
-
The Expectations Gap in Humanitarian Operations: Field Perspectives from Jordan
Asian Journal of Peacebuilding
2016 .01
-
국제재난법과 국제인도법의 상호관계에 관한 연구
인도법논총
2016 .12
-
ISIS 난민발생사태에 대한 인도적 개입의 적법성
법학연구
2016 .05
-
Reasons for NATO’s and Russian involvement in the Syrian crisis; comparative analysis of realist and humanitarian perspectives
평화학연구
2022 .06
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0