메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
우현아 (중앙대학교 독일유럽연구센터)
저널정보
중앙대학교 외국학연구소 외국학연구 외국학연구 제69호
발행연도
2024.9
수록면
469 - 492 (24page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
At the center of Germany's memory culture is the Holocaust, the genocide of European Jewry. Germany's undeniable responsibility for the Holocaust, defined as a historically unique destruction of civilization, is part of its identity. But by the 2020s, the ‘uniqueness’ of the Holocaust, which had been crystallized into a proposition, was again being questioned. In 2021, Germany was abuzz with the debate over the ‘uniqueness’ of the Holocaust, which led to a debate about the direction of Germany's memory culture that gripped the country and was soon labeled the ‘Historians' Debate 2.0’. The ‘Historians' Debate 2.0’ involved intellectuals from many countries, not just Germany, as the debate involved not only the assessment of the Holocaust and criticism of memory culture, but also very complex issues such as the legacy of the colonial past, racism, and Germany's political stance towards Israel. There is a growing consensus that it is important to expand the culture of remembrance to include colonial history, which until recently has been repressed in Germany's collective memory, and that Germany's political culture needs to change, especially in light of the immigration of recent decades. This is because immigrants who bring their own culture, experiences, and memories inevitably change and expand the political culture of the host country.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0