메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
오서영 (중국서남정법대학국제법학원) 양영홍 (중국서남정법대학국제법학원)
저널정보
중국지역학회 중국지역연구 중국지역연구 제11권 제3호
발행연도
2024.8
수록면
409 - 437 (29page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Village regulations and folk conventions are an important means through which villagers in Chinese administrative or natural villages exercise the right to self-governance granted by the Constitution. Article 27, Clause 2 of the the Organic Law of the Villagers Committees(2018 version) establishes two prohibitive legal rules: the “Non-Contradiction Rule” and the “Non-Infringement Rule” for the content of village regulations and folk conventions. Clause 3 further stipulates that village regulations and folk conventions violating these prohibitive rules should be rectified by the people's governments of townships, ethnic townships, and towns. These clauses constitute the substantive rules for reviewing village regulations and folk conventions. However, the absence of procedural rules makes it difficult for these substantive rules to effectively function through legal procedures. In practice, although the People's Courts have the authority to review the legality of the content of village regulations and folk conventions, it is not their statutory duty to review whether village regulations and folk conventions violate prohibitive rules. Consequently, the courts do not accept related civil disputes and administrative controversies. This not only undermines the efficacy of the village regulations and folk conventions formation mechanism but also impairs the constitutional implementation of villagers' self-governance. Therefore, this paper focuses on the practical issues and challenges of village regulations and folk conventions review in rural China, exploring the background, rationale, and construction of a dual-track review system for village regulations and folk conventions compliance. It argues for the necessity of establishing a more systematic village regulations and folk conventions legality review mechanism, incorporating both administrative and judicial reviews. More specifically, at the filing stage, the people's governments of counties (districts), townships, ethnic townships, and towns should conduct administrative reviews to annul, alter, or mandate the redrafting of village regulations and folk conventions that violate prohibitive rules. At the litigation stage, the People's Courts should conduct judicial reviews, disregarding village regulations and folk conventions content that violates prohibitive rules, and issue judicial recommendations to the relevant people's governments for lawful handling.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0