The OECD initiated the Anti-Corruption Round last year to prevent corruption and Transparency International (TI) located in Berlin pointed out Korean corruption index as the 46th among 177 countries in 2014 . The issue of corruption is now treated in the international level as well as in the domestic level and can have a critical effect on the international economic relations. Thus, anti-corruption is an inevitable task for us to survive in the age of globalization. Like many other countries, Korea has tried to eradicate corruption through a series of legislative acts and systems on its own, but failed to root out corruption. Most of the policies resulted in a one-time event with and will end at the expiration of the president’s term. The effective implementation and operationalization of efficient anti-corruption strategies are significant and imperative effective. In particular, considering the causes of painful changes in the previous political regimes and their failures to combat corruption, we may clearly point out that the need for integrated strategies for controlling corruption in korea Korea is urgent. The korean civil society must get rid of all the evil habits of national administration and the officials, and with necessary professionalism, serve as a monitor. Due to the officials'' easy-going attitudes the big amount of tax leaks every year. Especially, Police officials, however, still do not take the responsibility and neglect the responses from the Police Organization. In order for any Police organizations to control such a problem they must secure their own professionalism. Korean Police agency must use the system of prosecution. The problem is the over-generosity in our Police society not to reveal the corruption in spite of its obviousness. It is very difficult to let known the colleagues'' corruption in the Korean Police administration. That is why the Powerful sanctions need to activate their roles of monitoring. Korean Police Agencys must have a firmly established sense of moral and social reform of the cops. They must have a determined resolution that anti-corruption is imperative in the Korean Police Organization. If anyone of the police workers dare to do the reform for his or her social success, the anti-corruption roles of the police workers will fall to the danger of individual ambition(kim, 2010). Corruption is, in its simplest terms, the abuse of power most often for personal gain or for the benefit of a group to which one owes allegiance. This paper achieves a difference between causes and remedies in policemen in korea. It explores the interaction between corruption and anti corruption. while the policemen corruptions are easily difficult to measure, some studies suggest that its police corruption perception index would include This Paper hypothesizes that to examine perceptions of peoples towards corrupted cops behaviors according to various situational factors:1) meanings of corruption 2) individual factors 3) socio-organizational factors 3)legal- legislative factors 4)demographic factors. This study attempts to test the following five hypothesis. First,What is difference of corruption perceptions? Second,What is individual difference of corruption perceptions? Third, What is difference of socio-organizational factors? Fourth, What is difference of legal-legislative factors? Fifth, What is difference of demografic factors? This article focuses on the following: ·People perceptions learned with examples of corruption hypothesis in korea, ·The individual and institutional approaches to corruption perceptions, with particular attention to the role of the policemen sector and police society, including the maintenance of legal regulation. ·Hypothesis studies on Korean policemen. Lessons learned indicate that an effective integrity strategy would be multifaceted, combining police reforms, and strengthen police organizational integrity institutions. And police commitment would be key to sustaining this effort. ·Police Corruption has been found in all aspects, systems, for the most part individually problems, socio-environmental problems, legal problems.(Lee,2012) ·Police corruption has multitudinous causes, assumes many different patterns and cannot be accurately measured as if iceberg model under sea.(Caiden,2007:78-79) To Conclude, This Paper will be devoted that police corruption hamper organizational transparency and integrity. Especially, Police Corruption incidence has been found organization culture which forgive their sin and criminals each other. This Paper focuses on people perception on the police corruption. People think that corruption causes discretion, power, culture, ethics. Although, It is different between policemen and people but causes and effects are not many different. So, Korean Government and Police Central Agency will be trying to eradicate all corruption problem and patterns importantly.
제 1 장 서론 1제1절 연구의 목적 1제2절 연구의 범위 및 방법 51. 연구의 범위 52. 연구의 방법 6제 2 장 연구의 이론적 배경 7제1절 경찰부패 71. 개념과 유형 122. 원인 143. 기능 14제2절 한국의 경찰부패실태와 통제 161. 실태 162. 원인 203. 통제제도 29제3절 선행연구의 검토 361. 법· 제도적 연구 362. 개인·윤리적 연구 373. 문화·환경적 연구 38제 3 장 연구모형과 연구방법 42제1절 연구모형 및 가설 421. 연구모형 422. 연구가설 43제2절 변수의 조작적 정의와 측정 461. 종속변수 462. 독립변수 46제3절 자료수집 및 분석 481. 설문지와 표본추출 482. 자료분석 49제 4 장 연구결과의 분석 및 논의 50제1절 조사대상자 분포 501. 인구사회학적 특성 502. 기술통계학적 특성 52제2절 신뢰성분석 54제3절 연구가설 검증 571. 개인적 요인 572. 조직문화적 요인 733. 법제도적 요인 814. 인구사회학적 특성 요인 89제4절 조사분석결과의 논의 100제 5 장 결론 113참고문헌 118Abstract 125[부록 1] 상관관계 분석표 128[부록 2] 경찰의 시민인식 설문조사 129