메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학위논문
저자정보

김수은 (고려대학교, 고려대학교 대학원)

지도교수
김정숙
발행연도
2016
저작권
고려대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.

이용수2

표지
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (5)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study aims to define the sociocultural competences for Korean language learners and empirically explore its contents, emphasizing that sociocultural competence is essential for communication. Also, it investigates the educational method required for advanced Korean learners who still have socio-pragmatic problems in spite of their proficiency in Korean language.
This study defined sociocultural competence as ‘the ability to appropriately perform communication based on the recognition and interpretation of the social and cultural circumstances of conversation participants’. In other words, the sociocultural competence has the processes of ‘sense’, ‘interpretation’, ‘utterance/response’, and ‘reflection’. However, since reflection is a phase of integrating, evaluating, internalizing the sociocultural competence experienced from a specific communication after completing it, it has only educational implication without being included as a construction factor of sociocultural competence. Therefore, the detailed competence of sociocultural competence are expressed as ‘sense-competence’, ‘interpretation-competence’, ‘application-competence’. The sense-competence refers to the ability to distinguish the sensitivity on participants or situational variables and sociocultural messages. The process of interpretation implies the ability to comprehend and adjust the internal implication of utterance socially and culturally. The application-competence is the ability to make proper utterances and responses by selecting optimal messages based on the utilization of the sociocultural information that were previously recognized and interpreted in the earlier process.
To specify the sociocultural competence as an abstract concept, this study conducted the analysis of Korean discourses. First, the factors to construct sociocultural competence were classified into ‘sociocultural context’, ‘sociocultural difference’ and ‘language with sociocultural foundation’. Through the analysis of Korean discourses, the procedures of exercising sociocultural competence were identified in Korean language communication and the examples of construction factors of sociocultural competence were collected. Participants, conditions, and media in communication were inferred as the variables to organize sociocultural contexts. Moreover, the following two dimensions, social norms or ritual behaviors, and value systems including such as value, belief or attitude could be regarded as the factors to promote sociocultural differences. In addition, language with sociocultural foundation could be classified into system-centered language and significance-centered language. It was found that each of them was associated with the comprehension and application of the internalized meanings of problems and contexts regarding which expression would be selected within their systems.
In order to link the concepts and construction factors of sociocultural competence suggested, examining the actual circumstances of Korean language learners is required. In this sense, Discourse Completion Test (DCT) was performed for advanced Korean language learners, and the results were analyzed by college students and teachers in Korea. The analysis revealed that setting the relation among communication participants and comprehending their contexts highly affected the success and failure of communication, and the training for finding acceptable points among formal or honorific language systems was needed. Furthermore, the necessity of education with sociocultural foundation was revealed as well; it is to accurate knowledge of register of Korean expression or structure and apply the knowledge in the specific context.
Based on the actual circumstances of learners analyzed above, this study set the educational objectives and principles to improve sociocultural competence required for communication of advanced Korean language learners and prepared the examples for the classes. In respect to the examples of the classes, attention points for the classes were categorized and investigated in particular. The plans for experiencing the process of exercising sociocultural competence and integrally utilizing the experiences were also explored.
This study has the following implications: it suggests the concept of sociocultural competence to describe the roles of sociocultural factors in communication which were importantly recognized but could not be agreed upon in terms of their contents or conceptualization. Given that it emphasizes the shift from knowledge accumulation to the cultivation of experiences and sensitivity and suggests more communication-centered Korean language education, it provides future directions for Korean language education.

목차

1. 서론 1
1.1. 연구의 목적 및 필요성 1
1.2. 선행 연구 검토 및 문제 제기 4
1.3. 연구 방법 및 범위 14
2. 의사소통과 사회문화적 능력 19
2.1. 사회문화적 능력의 대두와 발전 20
2.1.1. 사회화용적 실패 21
2.1.2. 사회언어학의 흐름과 의사소통능력 26
2.1.3. 의사소통능력과 사회문화적 능력 31
2.2. 사회문화적 관점으로 본 외국어 교육 연구 48
2.3. 사회문화적 능력의 정의 57
2.3.1. 사회문화적 능력의 개념 57
2.3.2. 사회문화적 능력의 발현 과정 64
3. 한국어에서의 사회문화적 능력 범주와 내용 72
3.1. 사회문화적 능력의 범주와 내용 도출 73
3.2. 한국어 담화 분석을 통해 본 사회문화적 능력 83
3.2.1. 한국어 담화 분석의 절차 및 방법 83
3.2.2. 한국어 담화 분석에 나타난 사회문화적 능력의 발현 88
3.2.3. 개념과 범주의 정리 104
4. 고급 한국어 학습자의 사회문화적 능력 양상 분석 109
4.1. 연구 목적 및 방법 109
4.1.1. 연구 대상 112
4.1.2. 자료 수집 절차 114
4.1.3. 분석 방법 116
4.2. 분석 결과 및 해석 120
4.2.1. 수행 정도 126
4.2.2. 수행 내용 질적 분석 132
4.2.3. 결과의 종합 및 제언 148
5. 고급 한국어 학습자의 의사소통에 필요한 사회문화적 능력 신장 방안 150
5.1. 교육의 목표와 원리 150
5.1.1. 교육의 목표 151
5.1.2. 교육의 원리 157
5.2. 교육의 예 161
5.2.1. 사회문화적 능력 구성 요인별 유의점 162
5.2.2. 종합적 사회문화적 능력 신장을 위한 교수의 예 170
6. 맺음말 177
부 록 184
참고문헌 203
Abstract 209

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0