메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학위논문
저자정보

김근영 (고려대학교, 고려대학교 교육대학원)

지도교수
최인철
발행연도
2017
저작권
고려대학교 논문은 저작권에 의해 보호받습니다.

이용수2

표지
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Along with globalization, it has become almost a necessity to teach and learn English properly. As the trends go, Communicative Language Approach was introduced in Korean EFL settings. Moreover, Free-Learning Semester policy has been enacted as of March, 2016, in Korean middle schools. The purpose of this study is to examine the validity of a listening cloze and a speaking read-aloud task as alternative English performance tasks appropriate for Free-Learning Semester, compared to the traditional multiple-choice listening and the oral presentation speaking task. The randomly selected subjects are 100 first-year Korean EFL students, 70 male and 30 female, of a middle school located in Seocho District, Seoul. First, through a program called SPSS 12.0., the test results were analyzed in a 벼antitative manner. The listening cloze test includes partial dictation with 20 blanks of 1~5 words and each blank is counted as 1 point so that the whole becomes 20 points. The test is recited three times and the analytic scoring method with holistic feedback comments is used. On the other hand, the multiple-choice listening consists of 20 questions and each item accounts for 1 point which makes it a total of 20 points. In the speaking read-aloud test, students choose the text of the appropriate difficulty level between the easy level of 91 simple words and the intermediate level of 112 complex words and read it aloud after 1 minute of preparation. The chance of reading aloud is given once to each individual and the analytic scoring with holistic feedback is used. In the oral presentation test, students prepare their own scripts of various topics and difficulty levels. The total scores are all 10 points. The scoring criteria of the listening and speaking performance tasks are explicitly presented to the test takers in advance. The test results show that the alternative listening cloze test has higher validity, reliability, and practicality than the traditional multiple-choice listening test. Similarly, the alternative read-aloud speaking performance test demonstrates higher validity, reliability, and practicality than the traditionally performed oral presentation task. Moreover, the alternative listening and speaking performance tasks reveal high correlation with each other and the alternative performance test results illustrate high correlation with overall English proficiency of the participants measured by regular English exams beforehand. After the experiment, the analyses of errors that frequently appeared are conducted and student surveys as well as teacher interviews are held for further study. The limitations of this research include constrained sample characteristics, uneven gender ratio, the restricted kinds of alternative tasks investigated in this study, and the possible subjectivity and bias of a rater when it comes to developing test materials. Nonetheless, this research suggests such pedagogical implications as the importance of developing new alternative performance tasks to cater to various learners’ needs, setting the suitable construct to be measured for the Free-Learning Semester, detailed and explicit scoring criteria with meaningful feedback to be presented as indices for learners to notice their weaknesses as well as strengths, and the wash-back effects of the valid and reliable alternative performance test tasks to be considered as another opportunity for learning as well as teaching to advance to the next phase of English proficiency.

목차

표 목차 ⅳ
그림 목차 ⅵ
1. 서론 1
1.1 연구의 필요성과 목적 1
1.2 연구문제 5
2. 이론적 배경 6
2.1 의사소통교수법(Communicative Language Teaching) 6
2.2 자유학기제 (Free-Leanring Semester policy) 8
2.3 시험 유형 (Test Types) 14
2.3.1 표준화 평가 (Standards-Based Tests) 14
2.3.2 수행 중심 평가 (Performance-Based Tests) 16
2.3.3 대안적 평가 (Alternative Tests) 17
2.4 시험 구성 요소 (Test Method Facets) 21
2.4.1 시험 환경 Testing Environment 21
2.4.2 평가 채점 기준표 Test Rubric 22
2.4.3 입력 언어 Input 23
2.4.4 예상 반응 Expected Response 24
2.4.5 입력과 반응의 관계 The relationship between Input and Response 24
2.5 시험 유용성 (Test Usefulness) 25
2.5.1 신뢰성 Reliability 26
2.5.2 타당도 Validity 27
2.5.3 영향 Impact 28
2.5.4 실제성 Authenticity 29
2.5.5 상호작용성 Interactiveness 30
2.5.6 실용성 Practicality 30
2.6 관련 선행 연구 31
2.6.1 듣기 기능 평가 31
2.6.2 말하기 기능 평가 33
3. 연구 방법 36
3.1 연구 대상 36
3.2 검사 도구 37
3.3 채점 방식 46
3.4 연구 절차 50
4. 결과 분석 54
4.1 양적 자료 분석 Quantitative Data Analysis 54
4.1.1 기술 통계 분석 54
4.1.1.1 듣기 Cloze 수행평가 결과 55
4.1.1.2 Read-aloud 말하기 수행평가 결과 59
4.1.2 추론 통계 분석 65
4.1.2.1 듣기 수행 평가 65
4.1.2.1.1 대응 표본 t검증 65
4.1.2.1.2 독립 표본 t검증 66
4.1.2.1.3 일원배치 분산분석 67
4.1.2.2 말하기 수행 평가 68
4.1.2.2.1 대응 표본 t검증 68
4.1.2.2.2 독립 표본 t검증 68
4.1.2.2.3 일원배치 분산분석 69
4.1.3 상관관계 Correlations 71
4.1.3.1 이전의 듣기 및 말하기 수행 평가와 대안으로 제시된 듣기 및 말하기 수행 평가와의 상관 72
4.1.3.2 두 유형의 듣기 평가와 말하기 평가 서로 간 상관 72
4.1.3.3 듣기 및 말하기 수행 평가와 영어 정기 시험 결과와의 상관 73
4.2 질적 자료 분석 Qualitative Approach 74
4.2.1 오류 분석 Error Analysis 75
4.2.1.1 듣기 수행 평가 오류 75
4.2.1.2 말하기 수행 평가 오류 79
4.2.2 학생 설문 조사 Student Survey Results 84
4.2.2.1 듣기 수행 평가에 관한 학생 설문 결과 84
4.2.2.2 말하기 수행 평가에 관한 학생 설문 결과 87
4.2.3 교사 면담 Teacher Interview 90
5. 결론 95
5.1 요약 Summary 95
5.2 제언 Implications 99
5.3 제한점 Limitations 101
6. 참고문헌 103
7. 부록 107

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0