지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
A conquest of a nation by another was achieved in the past by means of force. A weak race was conquered and ruled by a strong one. Thus the history of man has been a succession of instances of the law of the survival of the fittest.
Though this force means the physical and military one, the potential structure of human spirit and intelligence behind it cannot be ignored, because force alone could never perpetuate the subjection of the conquered. In ruling an alien race, a conquering race eventually comes to resort to spiritual and intellectual means. It establishes a system to that end. And such a system comes to conflict with that of the conquered. The ruling race incriminates the acts of the dominated contravening its system.
Imperial japanm, following its Meiji Restoration of 1868, began entertaining an ambitious dream of conquering other nationsl. In the first step, it worked and carried out a plan to conquer Choson (Korea), a backward, weak nation close at its hand. Japan first forced Choson to conclude the Kanghwa Island various interests and concessions from the Han'guk government under forcible treaties
The Japanese aggression plan against Korea grew increasingly naked and open. And Korea at last become a Japanese protectorate the Korea-Japan protocol forcibly signed on Febreary 22.1904.
Japan kept digging deeper into the domestic affairs of the Han'guk government more and more aggressively, robbing it of its diplometic, financial, and police right, until korea was annexed to Japan under the Annexation Treaty signed between the two countries on August 25, 1910.
Japan subsequently posted a governor general in Korea, who was backed up by military police and secret police in his oppressive rule. Numerous patriots oppesed to the colonial rule were arrested and imprisoned.
In order to oppress the Korean people Japan enacted and enforced various evil laws, including the notorious Newspaper Law, the Publications Law, the Security Law, the Assembly Control Law, the Criminal Ordinance, the Firearms and Explosives Control Law, the Choson Flogging Law, and the Decree for Punishment of Political Offenders.
The freedom provided in the Japanese governor-general were law. The Korean race was thus deprived of the freedom of the press, publication, and assembly, and its patriots were punished under the aforementioned evil laws.
Following the forcible annexation, Korean patriots resited Japan and the colonial rule in armed revolts, but were suppressed by the powerful Japanese military might. They fled overseas or underground to continue their resistance.
In order to avert outright Japanese oppression, the independence movement of Koreans took to a form of legal stuggle under the name of new-culture movement. Nationalist leaders built schools. churches, and new industries, by which means they awakened the independent spirit of the Korean race.
The potential spirit of independence thus fostered among the Korean race, on the strength of the principle of self-determination for all nations that sewpt the world following World War I, developed into covert demonstrations across the country for independence. This cry for independence exploded on March 1, 1919, as the Samil Movement, which was a peaceful demonstration
of profess the spirit of independence as displayed in the Declaraion of Independence. Nevertheless, the Japanese authorities arrested, imprisoned, and tortured numerous nationalist leaders involved in this movement.
This essay introduces and analyzes the Newpaper Law, the Security Law, the Publications Law, and the Decree for punishment of political Offenders among the aforementioned evil laws Japan enforced for the purpose of oppressing the Korean race, and studies the legal system japan used in ruling Korea, and it further shows how such laws were applied in the course of trying Korean
patriots at court of law.
Particularly, it shows what laws japan used against the nationalist leaders of the Samil Movement, and introduces and critisizes the legal point involved in the applicaition. in short Japan attempted to oppress and rule the Koream race by means of evil laws with the backing of its armed power following the forcible annexation. But it unwittingly proved that a nation cannot dominate another perpetually by means arms alone.
Though this force means the physical and military one, the potential structure of human spirit and intelligence behind it cannot be ignored, because force alone could never perpetuate the subjection of the conquered. In ruling an alien race, a conquering race eventually comes to resort to spiritual and intellectual means. It establishes a system to that end. And such a system comes to conflict with that of the conquered. The ruling race incriminates the acts of the dominated contravening its system.
Imperial japanm, following its Meiji Restoration of 1868, began entertaining an ambitious dream of conquering other nationsl. In the first step, it worked and carried out a plan to conquer Choson (Korea), a backward, weak nation close at its hand. Japan first forced Choson to conclude the Kanghwa Island various interests and concessions from the Han'guk government under forcible treaties
The Japanese aggression plan against Korea grew increasingly naked and open. And Korea at last become a Japanese protectorate the Korea-Japan protocol forcibly signed on Febreary 22.1904.
Japan kept digging deeper into the domestic affairs of the Han'guk government more and more aggressively, robbing it of its diplometic, financial, and police right, until korea was annexed to Japan under the Annexation Treaty signed between the two countries on August 25, 1910.
Japan subsequently posted a governor general in Korea, who was backed up by military police and secret police in his oppressive rule. Numerous patriots oppesed to the colonial rule were arrested and imprisoned.
In order to oppress the Korean people Japan enacted and enforced various evil laws, including the notorious Newspaper Law, the Publications Law, the Security Law, the Assembly Control Law, the Criminal Ordinance, the Firearms and Explosives Control Law, the Choson Flogging Law, and the Decree for Punishment of Political Offenders.
The freedom provided in the Japanese governor-general were law. The Korean race was thus deprived of the freedom of the press, publication, and assembly, and its patriots were punished under the aforementioned evil laws.
Following the forcible annexation, Korean patriots resited Japan and the colonial rule in armed revolts, but were suppressed by the powerful Japanese military might. They fled overseas or underground to continue their resistance.
In order to avert outright Japanese oppression, the independence movement of Koreans took to a form of legal stuggle under the name of new-culture movement. Nationalist leaders built schools. churches, and new industries, by which means they awakened the independent spirit of the Korean race.
The potential spirit of independence thus fostered among the Korean race, on the strength of the principle of self-determination for all nations that sewpt the world following World War I, developed into covert demonstrations across the country for independence. This cry for independence exploded on March 1, 1919, as the Samil Movement, which was a peaceful demonstration
of profess the spirit of independence as displayed in the Declaraion of Independence. Nevertheless, the Japanese authorities arrested, imprisoned, and tortured numerous nationalist leaders involved in this movement.
This essay introduces and analyzes the Newpaper Law, the Security Law, the Publications Law, and the Decree for punishment of political Offenders among the aforementioned evil laws Japan enforced for the purpose of oppressing the Korean race, and studies the legal system japan used in ruling Korea, and it further shows how such laws were applied in the course of trying Korean
patriots at court of law.
Particularly, it shows what laws japan used against the nationalist leaders of the Samil Movement, and introduces and critisizes the legal point involved in the applicaition. in short Japan attempted to oppress and rule the Koream race by means of evil laws with the backing of its armed power following the forcible annexation. But it unwittingly proved that a nation cannot dominate another perpetually by means arms alone.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
WHAT IS LAW
저스티스
1965 .04
-
김정은 시대 북한식 사회주의법치의 의미와 한계- 법의 지배(rule of law)의 일반론적 시각을 중심으로 -
동북아법연구
2019 .01
-
THE RULE OF LAW
저스티스
1963 .04
-
日帝의 '3ㆍ1獨立運動' 裁判에 대한 法適用과 影響
법학논총
2005 .02
-
韓ㆍ日家族法の比較硏究
법학연구
1993 .12
-
LEGAL EDUCATION AND PRACTICE OF LAW IN JAPAN
저스티스
1974 .12
-
로스쿨에서 형사소송법 교육
형사법연구
2008 .01
-
한·중 환경기본법 비교 : 중국의 「환경보호법」을 중심으로
중앙법학
2009 .08
-
중국 사회주의법치의 발전과 과제
저스티스
2017 .02
-
군형법 제정의 역사적 배경과 관련 문제점
군사
2012 .03
-
미국의 전후처리와 한반도 독립 문제 : ‘근거 없는 독립’과 전후 한일관계의 기원
아세아연구
2013 .09
-
Glocalisation(국제화와 지방화)시대에 대비한 로스쿨 설치의 기본방향
노동법논총
2005 .12
-
일본 법과대학원에 있어서의 민사법의 이론교육과 실무교육의 조화
서강법학
2008 .12
-
Proof of and Information about Foreign Law in Japan
국제사법연구
2016 .12
-
법학교육의 과제
사회이론
2002 .06
-
충남대학교 법학전문대학원의 민법 교육과정 및 교육방법
법학연구
2008 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-910-013504936