지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Discussions about unfavorable acts of corporations in managing activities include many legal considerations. In general cases, first of all, legality of the given acts should be verified. If they are judged to be illegal in their procedures, whether it is possible to assert nullification for the acts by the corporation law or not should be examined. Next, the claim for damages against the actors should be considered. After that, whether the actors have criminal liability or not should be discussed.
In this case, it is difficult and complicated to judge what clauses of the Criminal Code in the substantive law apply to the unfavorable acts. This is a common problem in not only corporate crimes but also crimes involved in economy.
This difficulty of judgement results from the fact that most economic regulations, regarding corporate crimes, have abstract, indefinite and supplementary concepts. In real economy the interested parties affect each other's interests, and so, to reflect each opposing point of view of the interested parties, it is necessary that words and phrases in the statute be abstract and complicated. Like this, words and phrases in economic regulations tend to become more and more complicated and difficult to understand.
Accordingly, economic regulations should be interpreted in the aspect of the justice practical in managing reality, in that conflicts between the interested parties should be mediated considering economic reality. Today, among legal relations in economy are all kinds of interested parties, including shareholder, creditor, manager, employee, etc. And, when they have their opposing or common interests each, their interests can vary from situation to situation. In this economic reality, it will take much time and effort to lay liability on the director on the basis of fixed and rigid standards. On the other hand, when the director's business judgement in the long run causes the corporation to be unprofitable or suffer damage, the Question of whether criminal punishment can be imposed on the director is a very important one requiring careful consideration.
Also, even though the board of directors approves validity of director's self-dealing, the Korean Commercial Code has not yet included the regulations regarding the time of the approval. The economic reality has strongly demanded that post approval be accepted. Although it has been asserted that only prior approval should be accepted in order to exclude directors' conference, it is proper that post approval is accepted in the reality where directors I liability becomes heavier and heavier.
In this case, it is difficult and complicated to judge what clauses of the Criminal Code in the substantive law apply to the unfavorable acts. This is a common problem in not only corporate crimes but also crimes involved in economy.
This difficulty of judgement results from the fact that most economic regulations, regarding corporate crimes, have abstract, indefinite and supplementary concepts. In real economy the interested parties affect each other's interests, and so, to reflect each opposing point of view of the interested parties, it is necessary that words and phrases in the statute be abstract and complicated. Like this, words and phrases in economic regulations tend to become more and more complicated and difficult to understand.
Accordingly, economic regulations should be interpreted in the aspect of the justice practical in managing reality, in that conflicts between the interested parties should be mediated considering economic reality. Today, among legal relations in economy are all kinds of interested parties, including shareholder, creditor, manager, employee, etc. And, when they have their opposing or common interests each, their interests can vary from situation to situation. In this economic reality, it will take much time and effort to lay liability on the director on the basis of fixed and rigid standards. On the other hand, when the director's business judgement in the long run causes the corporation to be unprofitable or suffer damage, the Question of whether criminal punishment can be imposed on the director is a very important one requiring careful consideration.
Also, even though the board of directors approves validity of director's self-dealing, the Korean Commercial Code has not yet included the regulations regarding the time of the approval. The economic reality has strongly demanded that post approval be accepted. Although it has been asserted that only prior approval should be accepted in order to exclude directors' conference, it is proper that post approval is accepted in the reality where directors I liability becomes heavier and heavier.
목차
1. 서
2. 자기거래와 이사책임
3. 자기거래와 사회범죄
4. 자기거래와 경영판단
5. 자기거래와 이사회의 승인
6. 결어
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
理事의 自己去來와 개정 상법 제398조
법학연구
2011 .09
-
理事의 自己去來에 관한 商法 改正案 제398조에 대한 意見
법학연구
2010 .02
-
理事의 責任制限에 관한 硏究
기업법연구
2004 .09
-
중국회사법상 이사의 제3자에 대한 책임에 관한 연구
고려법학
2009 .01
-
일본 상법상 이사의 책임제한과 분할책임론
기업법연구
2003 .09
-
사외이사의 현황과 문제점에 관한 연구
기업법연구
2007 .03
-
2011년 개정상법상의 이사의 의무와 손해배상책임 : 이사의 책임제한을 중심으로
기업법연구
2012 .03
-
상법상 이사의 책임제한에 대한 연구
비교사법
2008 .03
-
명목상 이사의 책임
기업법연구
2009 .06
-
이사의 임무태만책임의 법적 성질과 구조
기업법연구
2012 .09
-
사외이사제도의 문제점과 개선방안
외법논집
2011 .01
-
이사회의 권한사항에 관한 연구
경영법률
2013 .01
-
社外理事制度의 問題點과 改善方向
기업법연구
2005 .06
-
삼성전자 판례에 나타난 법원의 경영판단의 원칙에 대한 태도와 이사의 책임 제한 - 대법원 2005. 10.28. 선고 2003다69638 판결 판례 평석 -
고려법학
2010 .01
-
판례상 이사의 임무 해태 및 위반에 따른 배임죄 적용에 대한 검토
동북아법연구
2012 .01
-
이사의 책임제한과 경영판단의 원칙
법학연구
2008 .08
-
중국 상업은행 사외이사 독립성에 관한 연구
일감법학
2012 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-366-013558678