지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In this article, how the North Korea's governmental policy that decided to pursue both economical developments and military defense were chosen and developed during the 1960s, is examined. Through this matter we can see North Korea's perspective upon the external situations of its realm, and also its policies regarding internal and external matters. And we can also see the military tensions that were building up around the Korean peninsula.
This new policy was first suggested in 1962, and the concept of the policy was accompanied by several existing principal ideologies such as independence and self-defence. What triggered this new policy was basicaIly the deteriorated relationship with the USSR, and the trend of nationalism which was becoming increasingly stronger throughout the Third realm states, The plans were to put an emphasis upon economical matters, while also saving strengths in military terms for executing and maintaining the Four-point Military Line or the Three Requirements for Revolutional Activities.
This new policy was publicly approved in the 1966's council of Representatives, in the light of certain series of events which included the signing of the Korea-Japan treaty, the North Korea's Own conception of new contingency plans entitled 'Three Arrows', 'Flying Dragon' , or 'Gaining Bull', the continuing joint military drill operations among Korea, U.S. and Japan, and South Korea's dispatching troops to the Vietnam war.
North Korea was clearly threatened by these chain of events, which triggered a heightened sense of national security on its part. As a resuIt, more than 30% of the government's annual budget was allocated to national defence costs, the so-called Four-point Military Line came to receive much more attention and support than ever, and the government also decided to support the Vietnam Communists. All these efforts brought significant reinforcements on the national defense front.
Yet at the same time, we should not overlook the Fact that the general public's desire for economical development was so strong that it was the primary reason for the very design of the policy which was meant tQ address both defense issues and economical issues.
This policy was also dictating and affecting the government's policy toward South Korea. North Korea secretly hoped that several political events which were going on inside South Korea such as the April's Democratic movement, the May 16th military takeover of the government, or the June 3rd Public demonstrations would eventually lead to a breakout of a revolution. North Korea's contingency plans were prepared for the possibilities of either a war started by the U.S., or an internal revolt inside South Korea. Issues regarding the Three Requirements for Revolutional Activities were reviewed and reinforced, covert installations trained for operations inside South Korea were increased, and active offences were being launched against South Korea.
This new policy was first suggested in 1962, and the concept of the policy was accompanied by several existing principal ideologies such as independence and self-defence. What triggered this new policy was basicaIly the deteriorated relationship with the USSR, and the trend of nationalism which was becoming increasingly stronger throughout the Third realm states, The plans were to put an emphasis upon economical matters, while also saving strengths in military terms for executing and maintaining the Four-point Military Line or the Three Requirements for Revolutional Activities.
This new policy was publicly approved in the 1966's council of Representatives, in the light of certain series of events which included the signing of the Korea-Japan treaty, the North Korea's Own conception of new contingency plans entitled 'Three Arrows', 'Flying Dragon' , or 'Gaining Bull', the continuing joint military drill operations among Korea, U.S. and Japan, and South Korea's dispatching troops to the Vietnam war.
North Korea was clearly threatened by these chain of events, which triggered a heightened sense of national security on its part. As a resuIt, more than 30% of the government's annual budget was allocated to national defence costs, the so-called Four-point Military Line came to receive much more attention and support than ever, and the government also decided to support the Vietnam Communists. All these efforts brought significant reinforcements on the national defense front.
Yet at the same time, we should not overlook the Fact that the general public's desire for economical development was so strong that it was the primary reason for the very design of the policy which was meant tQ address both defense issues and economical issues.
This policy was also dictating and affecting the government's policy toward South Korea. North Korea secretly hoped that several political events which were going on inside South Korea such as the April's Democratic movement, the May 16th military takeover of the government, or the June 3rd Public demonstrations would eventually lead to a breakout of a revolution. North Korea's contingency plans were prepared for the possibilities of either a war started by the U.S., or an internal revolt inside South Korea. Issues regarding the Three Requirements for Revolutional Activities were reviewed and reinforced, covert installations trained for operations inside South Korea were increased, and active offences were being launched against South Korea.
목차
머리말
1. 1960년대초 북·소관계의 악화와 자주노선의 등장
2. 안보위기와 경제·국방병진노선의 공식화
3. 경제·국방병진노선과 적극적 대남정책의 관계
맺음말
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Language Policies and their Effects in south and north Korea
언어
1980 .12
-
북한 6차 핵실험과 대외정책을 통해 본 남북한 교회교류 전망
신학과 목회
2017 .11
-
Linguistics and Language Policies in North and South Korea
Korea Journal
1982 .01
-
Conflict and Development of the North-South Relationship in Korea
Korea Journal
1985 .08
-
남북관계와 미국의 동북아정책 : 이론적 검토 및 실천적 제안
역사비평
2009 .08
-
북한문학에 반영된 한국 현대사 연구 - 주요 역사적 사건을 통한 남북한 문학의 비교론적 관점을 중심으로 -
한국문학논총
2008 .01
-
남북한과『역사비평』 : 25년의 성과와 방향
역사비평
2012 .08
-
데탕트와 한반도, 실현되지 못한 제3의 길
역사비평
2018 .08
-
미국의 대북 첩보활동과 소련의 38선 봉쇄 : 남북 분단체제 형성을 촉진한 1946년 미소 갈등
역사비평
2015 .11
-
The Kim Jong-il Regime’s “Military-first Politics” : Structure and Strategy of Discourse
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2009 .12
-
Higher Education Policies in Korea, 1945-83
Korea Journal
1983 .10
-
해방과 한국의 정치적 개신교
신학논단
2012 .09
-
북한과 중국의 미국식 인권개념에 대한 입장
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2005 .06
-
1976년 판문점 도끼 살해사건과 한반도 위기
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2005 .12
-
One Man’s Korea
Korea Journal
1968 .10
-
Korea and the U.N.
Korea Journal
1967 .11
-
The Sanjo Tradition of Korean Kŏmun`go Music : by Song Bang-song Seoul, Jung Eum Sa Publ. Co,. Korea, 1986
Korea Journal
1989 .02
-
Korea
Korea Journal
1968 .04
-
Literature and Art in North Korea : Theory and Policy
Korea Journal
1991 .06
-
ROK-U.S. Military Alliance and the Future of Korea’s Defense Policy
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2007 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-013726171