지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The representative director system, which has grown Korean companies into large enterprises. But, behind this high growth of the companies, the abuse of this representative director system gloomily prevailed so that the insolvency and bankruptcy of the companies resulted in the economic crisis of IMF relief finance. So, the outside director system and the audit committee were introduced in order to prevent the debilitation of the directors board by de facto directors. Also, the responsibility of business execution directors was defined and the sincerity duty of directors was required in order to restrain the influence of de facto directors. However, controlling stockholders and de facto directors still influenced the election of outsider directors so as to incapacitate the system of outside directors.
Considering this realistic problem, in order to restrain the influence of controlling stockholders and de facto directors over the board of directors, and minimize the systematic demerits of representative directors and maximize their systematic merits, the executive officer system of the United States can be introduced.
Of course, because the executive officer system is the typical American corporate system, the introduction of the system itself involves the structural limits. Therefore, introducing only the concept of the separation between business execution and management direction, we can make representative directors take exclusive charge of business execution only. That is, distinguishing the board of directors from executive officers, we can assign management direction to the board of directors and business execution to executive officers.
Considers the legal character of executive officers as based on the employment contract but also as the mandate contract in accordance with directors, and so treats shareholders' representative action and securities class action in order to ensure the responsibility of executive officers.
Considering this realistic problem, in order to restrain the influence of controlling stockholders and de facto directors over the board of directors, and minimize the systematic demerits of representative directors and maximize their systematic merits, the executive officer system of the United States can be introduced.
Of course, because the executive officer system is the typical American corporate system, the introduction of the system itself involves the structural limits. Therefore, introducing only the concept of the separation between business execution and management direction, we can make representative directors take exclusive charge of business execution only. That is, distinguishing the board of directors from executive officers, we can assign management direction to the board of directors and business execution to executive officers.
Considers the legal character of executive officers as based on the employment contract but also as the mandate contract in accordance with directors, and so treats shareholders' representative action and securities class action in order to ensure the responsibility of executive officers.
목차
1. 들어가는 말
2. 집행임원의 개관
3. 집행임원과 주주대표소송
4. 집행임원과 증권집단소송
5. 맺는 말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
社外理事制度의 問題點과 改善方向
기업법연구
2005 .06
-
사외이사의 현황과 문제점에 관한 연구
기업법연구
2007 .03
-
현대 주식회사에서의 이사의 책임범위와 신뢰보호
기업법연구
2007 .09
-
執行任員制度의 導入을 위한 立法의 課題
대한경영학회 학술발표대회 발표논문집
2007 .08
-
經營執行機能 關聯 商法改正案의 主要內容 및 向後課題
경영법률
2008 .01
-
사외이사제도에 관한 최근 논의와 그 개선방안
경영법률
2010 .01
-
執行任員制度에 관한 商法 改正案의 問題點 檢討
기업법연구
2007 .12
-
비상근이사의 감시의무
기업법연구
2017 .06
-
판례상 이사의 임무 해태 및 위반에 따른 배임죄 적용에 대한 검토
동북아법연구
2012 .01
-
사외이사의 독립성
경영법률
2013 .01
-
理事會의 經營監督機能 强化를 위한 社外理事制度의 導入ㆍ運營과 그 問題點 : 우리나라와 일본의 학설ㆍ판례를 중심으로
기업법연구
2006 .09
-
기업지배구조의 획일화 : 집행임원제도의 도입의무화에 관한 상법개정안을 보고
기업법연구
2013 .06
-
사외이사의 책임면제 · 완화론에 대한 비판적 검토
기업법연구
2007 .06
-
기업가치 결정요인으로서 겸임이사
산업경제연구
2013 .12
-
사외이사제도의 문제점과 개선방안
외법논집
2011 .01
-
중국 상업은행 사외이사 독립성에 관한 연구
일감법학
2012 .01
-
투명성 확보를 위한 기업경영기관의 개선
기업법연구
2004 .06
-
협동조합의 사외이사제도에 관한 연구
수산경영론집
2003 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-366-013796452