메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국기업법학회 기업법연구 기업법연구 제16집
발행연도
2004.3
수록면
89 - 121 (33page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The representative director system, which has grown Korean companies into large enterprises. But, behind this high growth of the companies, the abuse of this representative director system gloomily prevailed so that the insolvency and bankruptcy of the companies resulted in the economic crisis of IMF relief finance. So, the outside director system and the audit committee were introduced in order to prevent the debilitation of the directors board by de facto directors. Also, the responsibility of business execution directors was defined and the sincerity duty of directors was required in order to restrain the influence of de facto directors. However, controlling stockholders and de facto directors still influenced the election of outsider directors so as to incapacitate the system of outside directors.
Considering this realistic problem, in order to restrain the influence of controlling stockholders and de facto directors over the board of directors, and minimize the systematic demerits of representative directors and maximize their systematic merits, the executive officer system of the United States can be introduced.
Of course, because the executive officer system is the typical American corporate system, the introduction of the system itself involves the structural limits. Therefore, introducing only the concept of the separation between business execution and management direction, we can make representative directors take exclusive charge of business execution only. That is, distinguishing the board of directors from executive officers, we can assign management direction to the board of directors and business execution to executive officers.
Considers the legal character of executive officers as based on the employment contract but also as the mandate contract in accordance with directors, and so treats shareholders' representative action and securities class action in order to ensure the responsibility of executive officers.

목차

1. 들어가는 말

2. 집행임원의 개관

3. 집행임원과 주주대표소송

4. 집행임원과 증권집단소송

5. 맺는 말

참고문헌

Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-366-013796452