메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국기업법학회 기업법연구 기업법연구 제17집
발행연도
2004.6
수록면
219 - 233 (15page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The board of directors has two main functions: (1) Policy decision for business execution: and (2) monitoring the execution of directors. The 1999 and 2001 amendments of Korean Commercial Code enhanced the monitoring function of the board: concerning outside directors and audit committee. But they are not enough to secure the transparency and accountability, efficiency of corporate management. Because there is a conflict of power between chief director and general directors who are the members of the board of directors. The function of the board, executing and monitoring function, must be separated in Korean Commercial Code. In recent, American and Japanese Law have achieved the separation. As a result, monitoring is belong to the board, but business execution is a role of executive committee. The executive committee is composed of president, executive vice presidents, secretary, treasurer etc.. They are called officers. Their duties and responsibilities entail many of the same issues as experienced by directors.
This discuss will be applied to the government business corporations to secure the transparency and accountability, efficiency.
In this study, the needs to improve management organs of corporations and government business corporations are studied. Particularly, the problems between chief director and the board of directors in corporation and the problems of nominating president in government business corporations.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론

Ⅱ. 주식회사의 경영기구

Ⅲ. 공기업의 경영기구

Ⅳ. 결론

참고문헌

Abstract

참고문헌 (18)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-366-014099998