지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In this article, I present the current regime of American workers' compensation law with respect to the requirement of work - connected injury, and suggest the direction of construction which could extent the coverage of workers' compensation in modem work connected injury cases of Korea.
In any country, there have been difficulties in fixing and defining the boundaries of coverage. In the U.S., coverage problems have been solved by the approach toward the risk inquiry developing various doctrines aimed at defining the scope of the risk, e.g., the "positional risk" doctrine.
The positional risk doctrine is the most liberal of the scope of the risk theories, because the only inquiry under a positional risk theory is whether an injury arises out of the employment placed if it would not have occurred but for the fact that the conditions and obligations of the employment placed employee in the position where he or she was injured: One's employment was responsible for one's being at the time and place where an injury occurred. Even the most neutral of risks which are the cause of a great deal of conflict and confusion can be included.
Also, a liberal construction should be given to the definitions of employer and employees because of the objectives of workers' compensation and the need to make coverage as expansive as possible. The modern tendency is to find employment when the work being done is an integral part of the regular business of the employer, and when the worker, relative to the employer, does not furnish an independent business or professional service. This "relative nature of the work" test, not only is it more modern than the "right to control test," it is believed to be more realistic test in terms of the objectives of the workers' compensation law.
The purpose of the workers' compensation law as set forth in its title, is to provide financial and medical benefits to the victims of work connected injuries and promote the welfare of the employees.
Moreover, the rapidity of technical development and invironmental change in current society place workers in a greater exposure to a risk. In light of the objectives and policies of workers' Compensation a much broader approach should be taken in the construction of requirements of work connected injury.
Therefore, with respect to the requirements of work connected injury I propose a direction of construction which consists of adopting "positional risk" doctrine and "relative nature of the work" test in order to extent the coverage.
In any country, there have been difficulties in fixing and defining the boundaries of coverage. In the U.S., coverage problems have been solved by the approach toward the risk inquiry developing various doctrines aimed at defining the scope of the risk, e.g., the "positional risk" doctrine.
The positional risk doctrine is the most liberal of the scope of the risk theories, because the only inquiry under a positional risk theory is whether an injury arises out of the employment placed if it would not have occurred but for the fact that the conditions and obligations of the employment placed employee in the position where he or she was injured: One's employment was responsible for one's being at the time and place where an injury occurred. Even the most neutral of risks which are the cause of a great deal of conflict and confusion can be included.
Also, a liberal construction should be given to the definitions of employer and employees because of the objectives of workers' compensation and the need to make coverage as expansive as possible. The modern tendency is to find employment when the work being done is an integral part of the regular business of the employer, and when the worker, relative to the employer, does not furnish an independent business or professional service. This "relative nature of the work" test, not only is it more modern than the "right to control test," it is believed to be more realistic test in terms of the objectives of the workers' compensation law.
The purpose of the workers' compensation law as set forth in its title, is to provide financial and medical benefits to the victims of work connected injuries and promote the welfare of the employees.
Moreover, the rapidity of technical development and invironmental change in current society place workers in a greater exposure to a risk. In light of the objectives and policies of workers' Compensation a much broader approach should be taken in the construction of requirements of work connected injury.
Therefore, with respect to the requirements of work connected injury I propose a direction of construction which consists of adopting "positional risk" doctrine and "relative nature of the work" test in order to extent the coverage.
목차
Ⅰ. 연구의 목적
Ⅱ. 근로자재해보상 입법의 연혁
Ⅲ. 미국 근로자재해보상제도의 취지와 특징
Ⅳ. 업무상 재해의 요건
Ⅴ. 근로자 재해보상과 불법행위법(law of torts)의 관계
Ⅵ. 근로자재해보상법상의 급여와 사회보장법상 급여의 관계
Ⅶ. 시사점 및 결어
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
근로자의 이동 중 재해에 관한 미국의 보호법리
노동법연구
2011 .03
-
통근재해에 대한 헌재결정 분석 : 2012헌가16 헌재 제37조 제1항 제1호 다목 위헌제청
노동법논총
2013 .12
-
기간제법상 단시간 근로자 보호에 대한 재검토
노동법논총
2017 .04
-
국가 산업재해관리의 영향요인에 관한 연구 - 산업재해의 보상서비스를 중심으로 -
한국비교정부학보
2009 .01
-
근로자의 건강권
노동법논총
2010 .08
-
판례의 출퇴근 재해에 관한 보호범위 분석과 그 확장을 위한 연구
저스티스
2010 .10
-
미국의 임차근로자의 법적 지위
노동법논총
2011 .04
-
Incentive Effects of Workers' Compensation under a Dual System in Korea
법경제학연구
2008 .12
-
전자수리서비스 업종에서의 불법파견 관련 하급심 판례 재검토 : 서울중앙지법 2017. 1. 12 선고, 2013가합53613 판결을 중심으로
노동법논총
2017 .08
-
산업재해보상보험법상 질병의 업무상 판단
중앙법학
2013 .12
-
개정 비정규직 보호법령의 문제점 고찰
노동법논총
2007 .06
-
간병인의 근로자성과 노동법적 보호 방안
노동법학
2013 .12
-
고용형태 다양화의 요인과 실태
기업법연구
2003 .03
-
외국인근로자의 헌법상 근로권보장과 고용허가제의 쟁점사항
한양법학
2015 .11
-
Development Experiences & Policy Challenges of Workers' Compensation Insurance Scheme in South Korea
한국비교정부학보
2015 .01
-
해외파견근로자의 산재보험 적용
노동법논총
2013 .12
-
근로자 경영참여에 관한 법적 검토
노동법포럼
2016 .11
-
비정규직 보호법의 문제점과 해결 관점
법과 정책연구
2008 .01
-
출퇴근재해 보상과 자동차보험
법과기업연구
2015 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
산업재해보상보험법의 법적 문제와 개선방안에 관한 연구
이재삼
법학연구
2013
.09
근로자의 폭행으로 인한 사상 시 업무상 재해 여부 : 우리나라와 독일의 주요 판례 분석
조성혜
산업관계연구
2008
.06
재해근로자에 대한 요양비용의 부담원리
한경식
노동법학
2009
.06
산업재해보상보험과 자동차보험의 관계에 관한 연구 : 통근도상의 재해가 업무상 재해로 인정될 경우
김희성
노동법학
2008
.06
동료근로자의 가해행위로 인한 업무상 재해와 산업재해보상보험법상의 구상권 : 대법원 2004. 12. 24, 2003다33691 판결을 대상으로
박지순
노동법학
2006
.06
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-336-014099794