지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
King Onjo(溫祚), the founder of Baekje, built a new country near Han river moving southward with his tribe Buyeo(扶餘) around BC 18. He made a temple for his father Dongmyong(東明), who was a king of Jolbonbuyeo(later called Koguryo), and worshipped him as a national god. This was to mean that he became an heir of his father king through worship of Dongmyong who had been considered as a son of heavenly god. Baekje was utterly defeated in struggles with Koguryo and consequently losing its capital Hanseong(now Seoul) moved its center to Woongjin in AD 475. In and after this transfer of capital it seemed awkward to worship Dongmyong as a national god since he had no more influences on Baekje people than before the defeats in the struggles with Koguryo where he was respected as a national god as well. Thus the trend of worshipping Dongmyong by the dominant tribe Buyeo declined in Baekje. Instead, the Chinese gods, Haotianshangdi(昊天上帝) and Wodi(五帝), were worshipped. And the Buddhism became much more popular among the people, so the kings considered themeselves as Jeonryunsungwang(轉輪聖王). The gods in three mountains in the new capital Sabi and five great mountains in the whole country were added to the list of the national gods. With this worship of various gods Baekje strengthened its political and religious power to rule all tile local sects of Mahan(馬韓) tribes.
In this period the new aristocracy of Mahan tribe participated in the politics along with the traditional ruling class Buyeo tribe. So it was needed that the general opinion of the Mahan tribe was represented in any way. King Moo(600-641) prepared to move its capital to Iksan, which had been and was a major center of Mahan and Baekje. But even through all these efforts Baekje failed with the failure of the coalition of Buyeo and Mahan tribes in the changing Northeast Asian politics.
In this period the new aristocracy of Mahan tribe participated in the politics along with the traditional ruling class Buyeo tribe. So it was needed that the general opinion of the Mahan tribe was represented in any way. King Moo(600-641) prepared to move its capital to Iksan, which had been and was a major center of Mahan and Baekje. But even through all these efforts Baekje failed with the failure of the coalition of Buyeo and Mahan tribes in the changing Northeast Asian politics.
목차
머리말
1. 백제 건국 주도 세력의 정체성
2. 남천(南遷)과 정체성의 변화
3. 무왕의 익산 경영과 정체성
맺음말
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
백제 온조왕대 영역확장에 대한 재검토 : 비류집단 복속과 ‘마한’ 국읍 병합을 중심으로
한국사학보
2013 .02
-
백제 멸망 이후 馬韓 인식의 변화 양상
한국고대사연구
2015 .03
-
백제의 정체성 변화와 천도
통일인문학
2015 .06
-
백제의 마한 복속과 지방지배 방식의 변화
한국사연구
2003 .03
-
한성시대의 백제와 마한
헤리티지:역사와 과학
2003 .01
-
Characteristics of Mahan in Ancient Korean Society
Korea Journal
1974 .06
-
百濟 熊津期 곰 신앙의 역사적 전개와 穴寺
史叢(사총)
2010 .01
-
백제 국가형성사 연구 동향과 과제
동북아역사논총
2018 .09
-
高句麗의 馬韓繼承 認識論에 대한 檢討
한국사연구
1998 .09
-
고조선 문화의 지속성과 성립과정의 상생적 다문화주의
고조선단군학
2011 .05
-
4~7세기 백제의 경계와 그 변화 -경기와 충청지역을 중심으로-
백제문화
2018 .01
-
전남지역 마한과 가야 세력과의 관계변화와 의미
역사학연구
2019 .01
-
백제인의 미의식
역사학보
2006 .12
-
井邑地域 百濟系 佛像 考察
문화사학
2007 .06
-
고구려 5那部의 성립과정과 영역 검토
대구사학
2010 .01
-
백제의 천도
한국고대사연구
2004 .12
-
한국 詠史樂府에 나타난 對百濟史 認識考
漢文古典硏究
2016 .01
-
백제 한성기 중서부내륙지역 마한 토기 연구
고고광장
2016 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-014417560