개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Because of the great importance on political and philosophical probl-ems which Leviathan had, Hobbes became one of the originator of modern politics and philosophy, and as one of the representatives of absolute Sovereignty.
His theory of Common-Wealth had the elements of cure for the Civil War (1642-49) in England, and it was the necessary product of those times according to the demand of new political system to over-come the disordered chaos of the politics, religions and social problem, and to replace the theocratic system of mediaeval ages.
Under such a current background (in the state of disorganization), he understood that the instinctive character of human being contained egoistic facts, and insisted the theory of natural condition-what we call the name of "bellum omnium contra omnes".
His philosophical method was dealt with natural science and psy-chological method, but he chiefly used his born and characteristic per-sonality.
'He denied traditional idea of Natural Law and contributed to the development of modern political thought by stressing the Jus Naturale.
His absolutism of severeignty was not for any persons or parties or any dynasty, but was to protect mostly the natural right of all human beings, and to maintain the national peace. He didn't have any partial situation.
Today even in any countries which have any other political theory,
the absolute Sovereignty is not denied, and we must bethink about our criticism for naming Hobbes as a absolutist. For he insisted that all men are created equal and he suggested that in any case all the subject could resist against any unreasonable behavior.
The chief point of his theory of Common-Wealth was in the cons-truction or conception of national sovereignty, and it was considered one of his methods that he gave many rights to the Sovereignty.
Leviathan's weak points lay in his unifying thought for the national interests and there was no any statement for between nation and nation. Nowadays if his natural condition is similiar to the Cold War between any countries, it may be possible for us to lead a method from Hobbes to correct the new international order.
His theory of Common-Wealth had the elements of cure for the Civil War (1642-49) in England, and it was the necessary product of those times according to the demand of new political system to over-come the disordered chaos of the politics, religions and social problem, and to replace the theocratic system of mediaeval ages.
Under such a current background (in the state of disorganization), he understood that the instinctive character of human being contained egoistic facts, and insisted the theory of natural condition-what we call the name of "bellum omnium contra omnes".
His philosophical method was dealt with natural science and psy-chological method, but he chiefly used his born and characteristic per-sonality.
'He denied traditional idea of Natural Law and contributed to the development of modern political thought by stressing the Jus Naturale.
His absolutism of severeignty was not for any persons or parties or any dynasty, but was to protect mostly the natural right of all human beings, and to maintain the national peace. He didn't have any partial situation.
Today even in any countries which have any other political theory,
the absolute Sovereignty is not denied, and we must bethink about our criticism for naming Hobbes as a absolutist. For he insisted that all men are created equal and he suggested that in any case all the subject could resist against any unreasonable behavior.
The chief point of his theory of Common-Wealth was in the cons-truction or conception of national sovereignty, and it was considered one of his methods that he gave many rights to the Sovereignty.
Leviathan's weak points lay in his unifying thought for the national interests and there was no any statement for between nation and nation. Nowadays if his natural condition is similiar to the Cold War between any countries, it may be possible for us to lead a method from Hobbes to correct the new international order.
목차
Ⅰ. 序論
Ⅱ. 思想形成의 背景
Ⅲ. 自然狀態論
Ⅳ. 國家論
Ⅴ. 結論
Summary
Bibliography
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
홉스의 이성 개념 고찰 : 『리바이어던』의 “어리석은 사람” 논의를 중심으로
철학논총
2012 .04
-
홉스의 인간이해와 국가
철학
1991 .11
-
대중이란 무엇인가: 홉스와 스피노자의 정치사상 비교
영국 연구
2006 .01
-
홉즈의 「轉位」槪念에 대하여
역사학보
1974 .09
-
홉스, 여성, 계약 — 사회계약론에 여성이 있는가?
인문논총
2019 .01
-
홉스에서의 이성, 국가 그리고 '정치적인 것'
동서인문학
2012 .12
-
다중의 입장에서 본 평화의 문제
아시아문화연구
2009 .11
-
토마스 홉스와 무신론
역사와 담론
2010 .04
-
근대 주권 개념의 형성과 현대적 의의 - 국제관계에서 인권과의 연관성을 중심으로 -
윤리연구
2018 .01
-
서양근대의 전쟁담론에 관한 비판적 고찰
철학논총
2016 .10
-
홉스의 『리바이어던』에 나타난 힘의 문제 : 자연적 힘과 정치적 힘의 관계를 중심으로
철학탐구
2009 .11
-
홉스 철학에서 수사학의 정치적 의미
철학연구
2012 .06
-
칸트에 있어서 죄와 벌의 관계 : Hobbes, Bentham, Hegel과의 비교를 통하여
철학
1998 .05
-
홉스의 인간론에서 정념과 이성
철학연구
2007 .02
-
대한제국기 이승만의 인권 및 주권론 수용 : 그의 『독립정신』에 나타난 정치사상을 중심으로
한국민족문화
2008 .04
-
레비나스와 평화 :홉스와 다른 윤리적 평화의 설립
동서철학연구
2019 .01
-
홉스의 도덕철학과 유물론
철학적분석
2009 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-014444881