메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
국어국문학회 국어국문학 국어국문학 제138권
발행연도
2004.12
수록면
403 - 432 (30page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Recently people are raising their voices over the examination and settlement of the past. However, pro-Japanese is a heartbreaking issue for all of us, that cannot be disputed simply based on results or motives. Evaluation of literary works and writers during the period of Japanese imperialism must be made comprehensively in the other-centered study. Nevertheless, it seems that Han Yong-Un's literature and life are framed to be a cultural form necessary for
maintaining our historical identity out of obsession to the settlement of the past. This article is my secondary study to inquire into the question. Han Yong-Un is mainly concerned with liberation. This is evidenced by his daughter's memory. She said "my father was a politician". and Lee Neung-hwa evaluated Han Yong-Un with a reformative Buddhist monk who advocated Destruction first construction second. Since he tried to publish The Theory of
Chosun new Buddhism(『朝鮮佛敎維新論』,1913) and The Encyclopedia of Buddhism(『佛敎大典』,1914) and to establish the Buddhist Alliance(1914) after the failure of the Imjejong(臨濟宗) movement(1912), his absence from the Buddhist circle from September 1914 to September 1916 showed that he could not do by the resistance of the Buddhist circle under the influence of the government-general. Realizing that the true value is discovered only after passing through the present reality damaged, he, who had been alienated from the Buddhist circle, came back to Gyeongseong(京城=Seoul) in autumn 1916. His article Three Days with Old Paintings and Calligraphic Works(『古書畵의 三日』) published in MaeilShinbo(『每日申報』,1916.12.7-15) draws attention as a turning point of his life and literature. He had visited enlightenment thinker O Se-chang, who had collected a lot of old paintings and calligraphic works, and recognized the meaning of tradition and history, watching genuine works created by 1,291 ancestors throughout 1,200 years. There he also met writers of Yusim(『惟心』,1918) that he would publish later and the leaders of the 3.1 Movement(1919). In addition, he had sought for historical lessons and superiorities in moral culture through criticizing the contents and ideas of old paintings and calligraphic works rather than appreciating them aesthetically. Such neo-traditionalism shows a sense of history more actively than the leaders of Enlightenment that advocated the power of education and economy without independence in the 1910s, critical affirmation of tradition distinguished from the denial of tradition, and an utilitarian viewpoint with the purpose of digging up historical lessons different from the classicism of the Moonjang(『文章』) group in the 1930s who pursued aesthetic cognition through affective rapport with antiques. Confirming through the impressive experience that remains from the past are the root of peoples spiritual life, he advocated mindculturalism armed with moral culture and practical action and found a starting point for making a breakthrough in the reality of a colony swept by material civilization. Here the most noteworthy book is Jeongseongangeui Chaegeundam(『精選講義 菜根譚』,1917).

목차

1. 기억의 거울과 과거의 복원

2. 한용운의 소외와 불교계의 동향

3. 서화 배척당과 고인의 잔영

4. 국민의 정신적 생명과 그 뿌리

5. 시대의 불운과 운명의 행운

참고문헌

Abstract

참고문헌 (16)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-810-014452887