지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The aim of this study is to explore techniques of irony in modern Korean fiction and to explicate cases in which these techniques apply as a writing method. We will examine the correct definition of irony so as to understand the aspects of literary works written under the principles of irony.
Yu-Jeong Kim's novels and Man-Sik Chae's in the 1930s are worth being compared in this respect. We learn from the result of the comparison that irony with pathos shifts to humor and that with scorn to satire. On the other hand, Kwang-Yong Jeon's works and Jeong-Hyeon Nam's in the 1960s are compared to reveal that the alienate effects appear as a result of irony's affection on candidness, and that irony affecting on grotesqueness leads to empathy.
It is generally assumed that irony is a technique of expressing the opposite of a word's apparent meaning. However, this is a partial aspect of irony, called verbal irony. Irony doesn't confine itself to the characters' sporadic utterances, but appears constantly and ultimately. It represents itself as situational irony rather than verbal irony. The difference between verbal and situational irony lies in the aspects of their meaning transmission. The meaning of verbal irony is transmitted to the reader under the assumption that both the narrator and the hearer know what is the intention, while that of situational irony is sent to the reader under the assumption that the narrator never knows what is intended.
Situational irony can be subdivided into structural irony and dramatic irony. The former is connected to caricature-making so as to produce humor and satire. For example, Yu-Jeong Kim makes humor embodied through pathos to a naive hero and Man-Sik Chae completes satire by scorning an unreliable narrator. On the other hand, Kwang-Yong Jeon presents tragic irony appropriately, and hence makes the alienate effect operated without grotesqueness and inconsequence. Jeong-Hyeon Nam uses comedic irony, which doesn't make the reader scornful but leads him to feel empathy. In this comedic irony, the reader learns his estrangement from the universe.
If one perceives irony, he perceives the duality of things and events. Furthermore, the perception of irony embodied in fiction means the perception of the duality of the universe. Thus, it is important to understand irony as a method of novel-writing because it sheds light on the way to explicate principles of writing.
Yu-Jeong Kim's novels and Man-Sik Chae's in the 1930s are worth being compared in this respect. We learn from the result of the comparison that irony with pathos shifts to humor and that with scorn to satire. On the other hand, Kwang-Yong Jeon's works and Jeong-Hyeon Nam's in the 1960s are compared to reveal that the alienate effects appear as a result of irony's affection on candidness, and that irony affecting on grotesqueness leads to empathy.
It is generally assumed that irony is a technique of expressing the opposite of a word's apparent meaning. However, this is a partial aspect of irony, called verbal irony. Irony doesn't confine itself to the characters' sporadic utterances, but appears constantly and ultimately. It represents itself as situational irony rather than verbal irony. The difference between verbal and situational irony lies in the aspects of their meaning transmission. The meaning of verbal irony is transmitted to the reader under the assumption that both the narrator and the hearer know what is the intention, while that of situational irony is sent to the reader under the assumption that the narrator never knows what is intended.
Situational irony can be subdivided into structural irony and dramatic irony. The former is connected to caricature-making so as to produce humor and satire. For example, Yu-Jeong Kim makes humor embodied through pathos to a naive hero and Man-Sik Chae completes satire by scorning an unreliable narrator. On the other hand, Kwang-Yong Jeon presents tragic irony appropriately, and hence makes the alienate effect operated without grotesqueness and inconsequence. Jeong-Hyeon Nam uses comedic irony, which doesn't make the reader scornful but leads him to feel empathy. In this comedic irony, the reader learns his estrangement from the universe.
If one perceives irony, he perceives the duality of things and events. Furthermore, the perception of irony embodied in fiction means the perception of the duality of the universe. Thus, it is important to understand irony as a method of novel-writing because it sheds light on the way to explicate principles of writing.
목차
1. 머리말
2. ‘반어(irony)’의 개념과 양상
3. ‘구조적 아이러니(structural irony)’의 구현 양상
4. ‘극적 아이러니(dramatic irony)’의 구현 양상
5. 맺음말
참고문헌
저자소개
Abstract
참고문헌 (10)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
한국현대시 연구자들의 아이러니 인식- 아이러니 논의의 바람직한 자리매김을 위한 한 제언
세계문학비교연구
2007 .01
-
Concepts of Irony in the Early Modern Age
수사학
2005 .03
-
개념적 혼성과 아이러니의 의미구성
언어과학연구
2003 .03
-
아이러니의 의미적 특성과 해석
영어영문학연구
2008 .01
-
반어에 대한 화행적 고찰
새한영어영문학
2004 .11
-
언어적 반어의 대비효과와 화용론적 기능
영어영문학연구
2003 .01
-
사회적 친밀감 조성/증대를 위한 담화전략으로서의 아이러니 사용과 그 원리, 그리고 적합성
영어영문학연구
2019 .01
-
Irony와 의사소통, 그리고 적합성
영어영문학연구
2018 .01
-
한국근대문학사와 「운수 좋은 날」 정전화의 아이러니
한국현대문학연구
2016 .12
-
화행의미와 IRONY 의 관계
언어과학연구
1995 .12
-
OK. Please Show Me Your Marilyn Monroe Now : An Analysis of Metaphorical Irony
담화와인지
2013 .08
-
은유와 아이러니
영어영문학연구
2012 .01
-
Analysing Connection of Metaphor and Irony in Advertisements
언어
2013 .09
-
소설에 나타난 아이러니와 文體
코기토
1981 .12
-
Verbal Irony, Contradiction, and Speaker's Belief
언어
2001 .12
-
현진건 소설의 자기반영성과 아이러니
어문학
2009 .12
-
개념적 혼성 이론을 이용한 아이러니 분석 : 『더블린 사람들』 중 『자매들』을 중심으로
담화와인지
2016 .05
-
Rhetorical Irony in The Secret Agent
새한영어영문학회 학술발표회 논문집
2008 .05
-
염상섭의 체험적 창작론
인문학연구
2015 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-810-014515436