지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study aims to shed light on the characteristics of Chon(村), this is, local administrative unit of Silla during the 6-7th century, through an analysis of the documents written on The Stone Monument Erected At Namsan New Fortress (南山新城碑), The Wooden Tablet Excavated At Seongsan Fortress(城山山城出土木簡).
Now the opinions about Chon are divided into two: The one is that Chon was set up at Euprak(邑落) which had been political autonomous community before the 6th century. The other one is that Chon was set up at central village in Euprak. My opinion is as follows.
Euprak community was composed of many natural villages. One of them played the part of the center, the other small scale villages were around it like satellites. Because Silla government didn't dispatch local administrative officials to Euprak before the 6th century, this central village controlled Euprak politically and economically.
During the 6-7th century, Silla government dispatched Dosa(道使), namely, local magistrate to the central village of Euprak. Dosa managed Euprak community entirely, but he had to need helps and supports from the deep-rooted local elite. Because Silla government was not yet capable of ruling Euprak perfectly, it organized local administrative system with remaining the power structure between central village and the other villages of Euprak community.
In conclusion, Chon or local administrative primary unit of Silla during the 6 -7th century was set up at central village in Euprak. On condition that Dosa, dispatched to Chon, took charge of Euprak area with helps from local elite. The reason that local administrative primary unit was named Chon is that it had meant natural village in China after the 2nd century. This word was accepted and used as same mean in Korea after the 4th century. On the other hand, Do(徒) meant each village which wasn't still organized into local administrative system by Silla government.
But Unification oncoming, local administrative system in Sill a started to be changed. In behalf of effectively obtaining financial resources from Euprak area, the Silla government organized each individual village of Euprak into Chon. so power structure of Euprak community was dissolved. The change like this had been begun in the neighborhood of capital city and an advanced outpost area, step by step was spreading over all territory in Silla. In consequence, Silla government could take a census of each village, and realize the imposition of each village section in the late 7th century.
Now the opinions about Chon are divided into two: The one is that Chon was set up at Euprak(邑落) which had been political autonomous community before the 6th century. The other one is that Chon was set up at central village in Euprak. My opinion is as follows.
Euprak community was composed of many natural villages. One of them played the part of the center, the other small scale villages were around it like satellites. Because Silla government didn't dispatch local administrative officials to Euprak before the 6th century, this central village controlled Euprak politically and economically.
During the 6-7th century, Silla government dispatched Dosa(道使), namely, local magistrate to the central village of Euprak. Dosa managed Euprak community entirely, but he had to need helps and supports from the deep-rooted local elite. Because Silla government was not yet capable of ruling Euprak perfectly, it organized local administrative system with remaining the power structure between central village and the other villages of Euprak community.
In conclusion, Chon or local administrative primary unit of Silla during the 6 -7th century was set up at central village in Euprak. On condition that Dosa, dispatched to Chon, took charge of Euprak area with helps from local elite. The reason that local administrative primary unit was named Chon is that it had meant natural village in China after the 2nd century. This word was accepted and used as same mean in Korea after the 4th century. On the other hand, Do(徒) meant each village which wasn't still organized into local administrative system by Silla government.
But Unification oncoming, local administrative system in Sill a started to be changed. In behalf of effectively obtaining financial resources from Euprak area, the Silla government organized each individual village of Euprak into Chon. so power structure of Euprak community was dissolved. The change like this had been begun in the neighborhood of capital city and an advanced outpost area, step by step was spreading over all territory in Silla. In consequence, Silla government could take a census of each village, and realize the imposition of each village section in the late 7th century.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 南山新城碑의 記載樣式
Ⅲ. 中古期 行政村의 實態
Ⅳ. 맺음말
abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
함안 성산산성 목간으로 본 6세기 신라 촌락사회와 지배방식
목간과문자
2019 .06
-
6세기 신라 지방지배 방식의 변화와 ‘村’
한국고대사연구
2009 .09
-
新羅 中古期 행정촌 · 자연촌 문제의 검토 : 城山山城 木簡과「冷水里碑」를 중심으로
한국고대사연구
2007 .12
-
영남지역 읍락의 형성과 변화 : 경주·경산·김해지역을 중심으로
한국고대사연구
2016 .06
-
신라 촌락문서의 용도와 촌락의 성격에 관한 일고찰
한국고대사연구
2001 .03
-
삼국통일 후 신라의 지방 제도, 얼마나 달라졌나?
역사비평
2019 .05
-
高麗後期 農地改墾과 新生村
역사와 담론
2003 .04
-
충남지역 동제의 성격과 제의구조 고찰
어문연구
2009 .01
-
제2차 교육과정기 이후 『한국사』 교과서의 ｢新羅村落文書｣ 서술 변천
역사교육
2019 .12
-
평택 칠원 마을이 최우수 새마을이 된 사연
역사와현실
2009 .12
-
新羅帳籍을 통하여 본 統一新羅의 村落支配體制
역사학보
1980 .06
-
안동지역의 제례에 따른 음식문화(II) -동제(洞祭)와 제물(祭物)-
한국식생활문화학회지
1996 .01
-
6세기 신라 촌락지배의 변화 : 금석문의 使人과 道使를 중심으로
역사와경계
2015 .12
-
설화에 의한 문화주권 인식과 마을문화 읽기
어문학
2008 .03
-
신라의 6村과 山嶽祭祀
신라사학보
2011 .12
-
일제시기 촌락 재편과 촌락의관습법적 성격
대구사학
2006 .01
-
The Underground Village
Korea Journal
1976 .04
-
신라 건국과 斯盧 6村
신라사학보
2011 .12
-
1970년대 원주지역의 부락개발사업 연구 : 재해대책사업위원회의 초기 활동을 중심으로
역사와현실
2011 .12
-
9世紀 日本을 往來한 二重國籍 新羅人
한국사연구
2003 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-014519538