지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Corporate governance issues have largely focused on structural issues in America. The core of the structural issues is the board of directors in the publicly held corporation. In fact, the board exercises all corporate powers, but the board does not sufficiently protect the interest of shareholders. The reason is that the board does not fully supervise and monitor the management of large corporation.
Therefore, it is argued that the board should be reformed to protect and support the interest of shareholders. In this context, the board should create the board committees, including the audit committee, the nominating committee, the executive committee, and so on. Especially both the audit committee and the nominating committee should be exclusively comprised of outside or independent directors.
The nominating committee should be composed solely of independent directors. The New York Stock Exchange requires that each of its listed companies have a nominating committee composed entirely of independent directors. The most important function of the nominating committee should establish criteria for identifying appropriate director candidates and recommend them to the board. It is expected that the nominating committee enhances transparency and independence of the board in the context of corporate governance.
In the context of corporate governance reform, the system of board committees is established in Korea according to the American corporate laws. Article 2 of 392 of Commercial Act provides the system of the board committees. Also, the audit committee may be established under Article 2 of 415 of Commercial Act. Certain large corporations or banks, however, should establish both the audit committee and a kind of nominating committee composed largely of outside directors under Securities Exchange Act or Banking Act.
But, under Securities Exchange Act or Banking Act the nominating committee should only recommend to the board outside director candidates. This article analyzes some problems of the current nominating committee and then suggests some proposals with respect to improvement of the nominating committee under the current Acts.
First, the nominating committee should have an authority to recommend with regard to all directorship.
Secondly, the nominating committee needs to be composed entirely of outside directors.
Lastly, the criteria for identifying appropriate director candidates should be established and publicly disclosed.
Therefore, it is argued that the board should be reformed to protect and support the interest of shareholders. In this context, the board should create the board committees, including the audit committee, the nominating committee, the executive committee, and so on. Especially both the audit committee and the nominating committee should be exclusively comprised of outside or independent directors.
The nominating committee should be composed solely of independent directors. The New York Stock Exchange requires that each of its listed companies have a nominating committee composed entirely of independent directors. The most important function of the nominating committee should establish criteria for identifying appropriate director candidates and recommend them to the board. It is expected that the nominating committee enhances transparency and independence of the board in the context of corporate governance.
In the context of corporate governance reform, the system of board committees is established in Korea according to the American corporate laws. Article 2 of 392 of Commercial Act provides the system of the board committees. Also, the audit committee may be established under Article 2 of 415 of Commercial Act. Certain large corporations or banks, however, should establish both the audit committee and a kind of nominating committee composed largely of outside directors under Securities Exchange Act or Banking Act.
But, under Securities Exchange Act or Banking Act the nominating committee should only recommend to the board outside director candidates. This article analyzes some problems of the current nominating committee and then suggests some proposals with respect to improvement of the nominating committee under the current Acts.
First, the nominating committee should have an authority to recommend with regard to all directorship.
Secondly, the nominating committee needs to be composed entirely of outside directors.
Lastly, the criteria for identifying appropriate director candidates should be established and publicly disclosed.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 지명위원회의 개관
Ⅲ. 지명위원회의 역할
Ⅳ. 지명위원회의 독립성
Ⅴ. 우리 법상의 논의
Ⅵ. 결론
參考文獻
Abstract
참고문헌 (40)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
개정상법에 있어서 회사지배구조
경영법률
2011 .01
-
주식회사의 감사제도에 관한 연구
기업법연구
2004 .09
-
株式會社의 監査委員會에 관한 硏究
법학연구
2003 .06
-
주식회사 감사위원회제도의 개선에 관한 비교법적 연구 : 미국의 Sarbanes-Oxley Act 관련 규정을 중심으로
법학연구
2003 .06
-
理事會의 經營監督機能 强化를 위한 社外理事制度의 導入ㆍ運營과 그 問題點 : 우리나라와 일본의 학설ㆍ판례를 중심으로
기업법연구
2006 .09
-
병원의 위원회제도에 관한 연구 -서울시내 대학병원을 중심으로-
보건행정학회지
1996 .01
-
The Optimal Structure of Boards : A Theoretical Approach
한국경영학회 융합학술대회
2009 .08
-
금융투자회사에서의 감사위원회 제도 검토
법과기업연구
2013 .12
-
투명성 확보를 위한 기업경영기관의 개선
기업법연구
2004 .06
-
現行 株式會社 監査制度의 問題點과 그 改善方案
기업법연구
2004 .09
-
이사회 독립성에 영향을 미치는 사외이사후보추천위원회 특성에 대한 연구
관리회계연구
2013 .12
-
Integrated Strategy and Corporate Social Performance : Does Having a Board-Level Committee Make a Difference?
한국경영학회 융합학술대회
2010 .08
-
監査委員會制度의 問題點과 改善方案에 관한 硏究
기업법연구
2006 .09
-
이사회의 개선방안에 대한 고찰— 최근 미국에서의 논의를 중심으로 —
경영법률
2014 .01
-
주식회사 감사제도의 문제점과 그 개선방안
재산법연구
2008 .01
-
감사위원회에 관한 2013년 상법개정안의 비판적 검토
기업법연구
2013 .12
-
이사회 활동성 결정요인과 이사회 활동성이 기업성과에 미치는 영향
산업경제연구
2011 .12
-
The Association between the Quality of Audit Committee & Board of Directors and Firm’s Financial Performance : Evidence from S&P 500 Companies
국제회계연구
2015 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-366-014536363