지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The Samguk yusa (Memorabilia of the Three Kingdoms) recorded that the history of the Old Choson began as the Tan’gun Choson and was succeeded by the Kija (Jizi) Choson. It quoted the Chinese historical document of the Weishu and mentioned specifically the capital and dates of Tan’gun. These records are very important and credible, but there are still some tendencies to discredit them because of confusion with the records of the Kogi (Old Records). The Weishu, probably compiled around the 3rd century CE, stated that Tan’gun established Asadal as his capital two thousand years before, and we can date the Tan’gun Choson perhaps to the 17th century BCE. This was the time when a new leader recorded in Korean historical documents first appeared.
As Kija did not go east to Korea, today the history of the Kija Choson has been negated. I label the period of Kija Choson as the Yemaek Choson because that was the time when the Yemaek people, a branch of Korean nation, were active. Thus, while the term “Old Choson” may still be employed to refer to the entire ancient period, it can not properlyrepresent specific historical stage. It is more appropriate to state explicitly “Tan’gun” and “Tan’gun Choson.” If we use the term “Old Choson” while denying the existence of the Kija Choson, it will merely shorten the history of the Old Choson and create more confusion.
The Mandolin-shaped Bronze Dagger has been considered as the representative relicof the culture of the Old Choson. This relic has been found in the area stretching from the Inner Mongolia to the southern shores of the Korean Peninsula and the date goes back to the 10th century BCE. However, as scholars have made too close a connection between the cultures of the Old Choson and the Mandolin-shaped Bronze Dagger, some have come to asserta mistaken notion that the history of the Old Choson began around the 10th century BCE. The culture of the Mandolin-shaped Bronze Dagger represents the culture of the Yemaek Choson. Since Tan’gun Choson predates the Yemaek Choson, we need to search for other relics that can show the cultural stages of the Tan’gun Choson. Thus, it is preferable to use the terms “Tan’gun Choson” and “Yemaek Choson” instead of an ambiguous expression of the “Old Choson.” The culture of the Mandolin-shaped Bronze Dagger can represent the cultural stage only if we can place it in the proper historical stage.
As Kija did not go east to Korea, today the history of the Kija Choson has been negated. I label the period of Kija Choson as the Yemaek Choson because that was the time when the Yemaek people, a branch of Korean nation, were active. Thus, while the term “Old Choson” may still be employed to refer to the entire ancient period, it can not properlyrepresent specific historical stage. It is more appropriate to state explicitly “Tan’gun” and “Tan’gun Choson.” If we use the term “Old Choson” while denying the existence of the Kija Choson, it will merely shorten the history of the Old Choson and create more confusion.
The Mandolin-shaped Bronze Dagger has been considered as the representative relicof the culture of the Old Choson. This relic has been found in the area stretching from the Inner Mongolia to the southern shores of the Korean Peninsula and the date goes back to the 10th century BCE. However, as scholars have made too close a connection between the cultures of the Old Choson and the Mandolin-shaped Bronze Dagger, some have come to asserta mistaken notion that the history of the Old Choson began around the 10th century BCE. The culture of the Mandolin-shaped Bronze Dagger represents the culture of the Yemaek Choson. Since Tan’gun Choson predates the Yemaek Choson, we need to search for other relics that can show the cultural stages of the Tan’gun Choson. Thus, it is preferable to use the terms “Tan’gun Choson” and “Yemaek Choson” instead of an ambiguous expression of the “Old Choson.” The culture of the Mandolin-shaped Bronze Dagger can represent the cultural stage only if we can place it in the proper historical stage.
목차
서언
Ⅰ. 『三國遺事』의 檀君기사와 年代 문제
Ⅱ. 琵琶形銅劍의 문제
여언
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
고조선 연구의 현황과 과제
고조선단군학
2003 .12
-
『三國遺事』와 『潛夫論』의 고조선 인식
고조선단군학
2010 .05
-
고조선의 붕괴 원인
고조선단군학
2010 .11
-
丁應泰의 '朝鮮誣告事件'을 통해 본 조ㆍ명관계
사학연구
2004 .12
-
고조선의 실존문제 : 상식적 탐색
고조선단군학
2011 .11
-
黃遵憲의 『朝鮮策略』에 나타난 朝鮮自强策과 ‘地域’의식
동양고전연구
2010 .01
-
衛滿朝鮮의 領域과 王儉城
한국고대사연구
2001 .06
-
한말 일제강점기 민족사학자들의 위만과 위만조선 이해와 서술
역사연구
2017 .12
-
衛滿朝鮮의 王權과 地方統治體制
한국고대사연구
2004 .03
-
日帝の朝鮮支配末期における情報ㆍ宣伝政策
아시아문화연구
2007 .05
-
미국 학계에서의 조선성리학 연구현황
동양철학연구
2009 .01
-
조선중화주의의 재검토 : 이론적 접근
한국사연구
2013 .09
-
1937-45년 일제의 戰費調達과 朝鮮銀行卷 發行制度 전환
한국사연구
2004 .12
-
한국 중·고등학교 한국사교과서에서 고조선 지명의 비정(比定)에 관하여
고조선단군학
2014 .06
-
朝鮮時代 賤人身分變動의 諸問題
경주사학
1996 .12
-
조선전기의 司饔院
한국사학보
1998 .03
-
조선 후기 소설론의 전개
국어국문학
1985 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-015115229