지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
At the start of the new century, it is fair to say that we face environmental challenges unprecedented in human history. Largely through human activity, life on Earth faces the greatest mass extinctions since the end of the dinosaur age. The natural resources that sustain life on this planet - air, water, and soil - are being polluted or depleted at alarming rates. The tendency in our culture is to treat such issues as simply scientific, technological, or political problems. But they are much more than this. These environmental and ecological controversies raise fundamental questions about what we as human beings value, about the kind of beings we are, the kinds of lives we should live, and the kind of world in which we might flourish.
We can find much insight in Lawrence which leads us to solve the environmental and ecological problems of our only Earth. Lawrence's poems, especially "Snake", convince us that ecological thought is a "subversive subject" as Paul Sears suggests. Lawrence represents through poetical imagination what ecology is trying to subvert. Some of the possibilities that come to mind are: the accepted notion of what science does; the values and institutions of expansionary capitalism; the bias against nature in western religion(Christianity). All of these were targets of not only Lawrence but also the nineteenth-century Romantics. But Lawrence is different from those Romantics in that he perceives the relationship between parts and the whole and the dynamics of change that govern this whole.
Lawrence shared the Romantic approach to nature with the previous Romantics; that is, it was concerned with relation, interdependence, and holism. These characteristics of Lawrence or Romantics are criticised by contemporary ecologists. The view received by Romantics is inclined to regard the wilderness as a static unchanging place and have a tendency to identify the wilderness with an idealized image as it existed at one particular point in time. Many ecocentric critics think that this view can see humans as separate from nature, perhaps drawing inspiration from it but nevertheless radically different from it. They stress the Darwinian understanding that humans are much a part of nature, neither transcendent to nor radically different from it. From that perspective, acceptance of a dualism of Romantics that man is different from nature can encourage conflict that man is against nature.
The principle of objectivity demanded a cosmos stripped clean of all the emotional and spiritual qualities men and women theretofore had found in the natural world. The quest of objectivity also meant that the outer, physical world was to be kept firmly separated from all religious experience. The Romantic (or Lawrence's) rebellion was in large measure a refusal to grant scientific objectivity the authority it demanded as the only guide to truth and nature. According to Lawrence, one of the major faults of modem science including ecology was its contention that a man should coolly give his chief attention to the phenomenon which excites himself as something independent of himself. Lawrence's view of nature is that to see nature from an inner, personal, human perspective is a humble acknowledgment of correspondence and kinship. He says that if a man could not receive nature as an extension of himself, then it would be an alien world.
A life-community Lawrence tried to construct is a community conceived on the ecological principle. In this life-community, not a detached, foreign world of objects as things, not even a system of merely economic relatedness, but a confluence of spirit and matter, must be the vision of Lawrence. Lawrence admitted that this deeper dimension of relationship could be explored or that it was much more important to do so.
We can find much insight in Lawrence which leads us to solve the environmental and ecological problems of our only Earth. Lawrence's poems, especially "Snake", convince us that ecological thought is a "subversive subject" as Paul Sears suggests. Lawrence represents through poetical imagination what ecology is trying to subvert. Some of the possibilities that come to mind are: the accepted notion of what science does; the values and institutions of expansionary capitalism; the bias against nature in western religion(Christianity). All of these were targets of not only Lawrence but also the nineteenth-century Romantics. But Lawrence is different from those Romantics in that he perceives the relationship between parts and the whole and the dynamics of change that govern this whole.
Lawrence shared the Romantic approach to nature with the previous Romantics; that is, it was concerned with relation, interdependence, and holism. These characteristics of Lawrence or Romantics are criticised by contemporary ecologists. The view received by Romantics is inclined to regard the wilderness as a static unchanging place and have a tendency to identify the wilderness with an idealized image as it existed at one particular point in time. Many ecocentric critics think that this view can see humans as separate from nature, perhaps drawing inspiration from it but nevertheless radically different from it. They stress the Darwinian understanding that humans are much a part of nature, neither transcendent to nor radically different from it. From that perspective, acceptance of a dualism of Romantics that man is different from nature can encourage conflict that man is against nature.
The principle of objectivity demanded a cosmos stripped clean of all the emotional and spiritual qualities men and women theretofore had found in the natural world. The quest of objectivity also meant that the outer, physical world was to be kept firmly separated from all religious experience. The Romantic (or Lawrence's) rebellion was in large measure a refusal to grant scientific objectivity the authority it demanded as the only guide to truth and nature. According to Lawrence, one of the major faults of modem science including ecology was its contention that a man should coolly give his chief attention to the phenomenon which excites himself as something independent of himself. Lawrence's view of nature is that to see nature from an inner, personal, human perspective is a humble acknowledgment of correspondence and kinship. He says that if a man could not receive nature as an extension of himself, then it would be an alien world.
A life-community Lawrence tried to construct is a community conceived on the ecological principle. In this life-community, not a detached, foreign world of objects as things, not even a system of merely economic relatedness, but a confluence of spirit and matter, must be the vision of Lawrence. Lawrence admitted that this deeper dimension of relationship could be explored or that it was much more important to do so.
목차
1. ‘낭만주의 자연관‘에 대한 반인본주의적 시각
2. 문학생태학적 모색의 전제 조건인 휴머니즘
3. 휴머니즘에 근거한 로렌스의 생태주의
4. 로렌스의 문학생택학적 전망
<참고문헌>
저자소개
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
D.H. Lawrence 小考
코기토
1967 .12
-
D. H. Lawrence의 초기 소설 연구
새한영어영문학
1999 .05
-
D. H. Lawrence의 시와 대화
동서문화
1997 .02
-
로렌스와 녹색사유
D. H. 로렌스 연구
2009 .01
-
D.H. Lawrence : 생명적 실재의 추구
새한영어영문학
1987 .12
-
D. H. Lawrence의 단편소설 연구
신영어영문학
1996 .06
-
D.H. Lawrence의 단편소설 小考
동서문화
1992 .12
-
D. H. Lawrence의 생명주의(Ⅱ)
코기토
1986 .12
-
The Ideal Relationship between Man and Woman : A Study of D.H. Lawrence
동서문화
1980 .12
-
Lawrence, the Academy, and the “Other”
D. H. 로렌스 연구
2007 .01
-
Why Study Lawrence, Why Not Teach Lawrence in a New Way?: D. H. Lawrence in the Decade of the British New Left and Now
D. H. 로렌스 연구
2008 .01
-
사랑의 정치학: D. H. 로렌스 에세이 연구
D. H. 로렌스 연구
2013 .01
-
로렌스와 문학생태학
D. H. 로렌스 연구
2010 .01
-
D. H. Lawrence의 중편소설에 나타난 상징성
신영어영문학
1997 .08
-
D.H.Lawrence의 생명주의 Ⅰ
코기토
1985 .06
-
D. H. Lawrence의 이상향 추구에 관한 연구 : 그의 후기소설을 중심으로
새한영어영문학
1995 .04
-
D. H. 로렌스 사상에 나타난 포스트 모던적 요소
D. H. 로렌스 연구
2014 .01
-
로렌스의 시—동물적 삶의 찬가
영어영문학21
2010 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
로렌스의 시에 나타난 차이를 통한 타자의 이해
전영옥
동서비교문학저널
2010
.12
“하위 계층은 말할 수 있는가?” : 지역문학에 나타난 민중성
강민건
영어영문학
2014
.05
생태시란 무엇인가? - J. Scott Bryson ed, Ecopoetry : A Critical Introduction, The University of Utah Press(2002)
신양숙
문학과환경
2005
.10
“오래된 미래” : 심층생태학-생태여성주의 논쟁과 노장사상
신두호
동서비교문학저널
1998
.12
니체와 老子의 생태학적 자연관
양해림
동서문화
2000
.10
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-810-015294363