지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In 1910's Korean new intellectuals who accepted European individualism and conservatism systematically, was being extension of HanMal social darwinism, developed the modern bourgeois thoughts. And they made progress than a former generation. Though they made much of a value to pursue personal profit and development, they recognized an individuality and a society to be an organism, and they emphasized personal moral duty for the nation and the society.
This thought of social organism made much of a tradition. Because a society was the creature which was living and not machine, and was taking down a root like a tree in the past, the traditional succession is indivisible relationship with the development of person combined with a society. They regarded a nation as that kind of a personal gathering, too. Under imperialism world system of the law of the jungle in particular, it was aimed at through the individual awareness that is a social member and the development of a personality, because the nation which was an actual survival competition unit was a personal gathering. It was the existence to have the durability that was not only the area range or instantaneous group, and formed history for a long time in the same area at this time. This understanding about the nation was to do a communication a bit with the national organism of German romanticism.
On the view of social darwinistic, conservative, romantic nationalism, the preservation of tradition was for proof to do the national survival ability, and it was a way to keep national identity and union. In these intentions it was attempted to preserve the national essence on the SIN MUN KWAN(新文館) and CHOSUN KWANG MUN HOE(朝鮮光文會) where were Choe, Nam-Seon(崔南善) executed the center. The SIN MUN KWAN was as if salon and the place where intellectuals had been study in Japan haunted. They reissued all kinds of culture books and a Korean classics, and published Korean ethnic culture studies. It was a purpose to improve personal culture and civilization through 'worship about ancestors' and 'preservation of old culture', and it was for the nation composed with individual to keep national cultural subjectivity and identity. In a word, the 'civilization' and 'preservation of national essence' were necessary for an national modern survival together.
Thus the 'national essence' recognition that was formed at the middle of HanMal nationalism thought was readjusted as the theme of the national modern awareness since under the Japanese imperialism. And it was basic to oppose a destruction of ethnic culture by other nation because these preservation of national essence made much of singularity of a national organism. Therefore, they criticized that Japanese imperialism colonized the Korean tradition culture, for example IlSeonDongJoRon and the assimilation of national culture.
However, their movement of preservation of national essence emphasized an economic cultural progress of the national organism than independence. While a landlord and a capitalist kept the existing system to lead, they made much of a union of Kurturnation. And they were off national political pending problem and weaken recognition of class problem and meaning of ethnic independence. Their this cultural and conservative inclinations are advanced with the movement of enhancement of traditional Korean culture which strengthens the class of oneself and a location of thoughts when capital-nationalists performed 'Culture movement' within the system under 'Culture politics' of the Japanese imperialism in 1920's.
This thought of social organism made much of a tradition. Because a society was the creature which was living and not machine, and was taking down a root like a tree in the past, the traditional succession is indivisible relationship with the development of person combined with a society. They regarded a nation as that kind of a personal gathering, too. Under imperialism world system of the law of the jungle in particular, it was aimed at through the individual awareness that is a social member and the development of a personality, because the nation which was an actual survival competition unit was a personal gathering. It was the existence to have the durability that was not only the area range or instantaneous group, and formed history for a long time in the same area at this time. This understanding about the nation was to do a communication a bit with the national organism of German romanticism.
On the view of social darwinistic, conservative, romantic nationalism, the preservation of tradition was for proof to do the national survival ability, and it was a way to keep national identity and union. In these intentions it was attempted to preserve the national essence on the SIN MUN KWAN(新文館) and CHOSUN KWANG MUN HOE(朝鮮光文會) where were Choe, Nam-Seon(崔南善) executed the center. The SIN MUN KWAN was as if salon and the place where intellectuals had been study in Japan haunted. They reissued all kinds of culture books and a Korean classics, and published Korean ethnic culture studies. It was a purpose to improve personal culture and civilization through 'worship about ancestors' and 'preservation of old culture', and it was for the nation composed with individual to keep national cultural subjectivity and identity. In a word, the 'civilization' and 'preservation of national essence' were necessary for an national modern survival together.
Thus the 'national essence' recognition that was formed at the middle of HanMal nationalism thought was readjusted as the theme of the national modern awareness since under the Japanese imperialism. And it was basic to oppose a destruction of ethnic culture by other nation because these preservation of national essence made much of singularity of a national organism. Therefore, they criticized that Japanese imperialism colonized the Korean tradition culture, for example IlSeonDongJoRon and the assimilation of national culture.
However, their movement of preservation of national essence emphasized an economic cultural progress of the national organism than independence. While a landlord and a capitalist kept the existing system to lead, they made much of a union of Kurturnation. And they were off national political pending problem and weaken recognition of class problem and meaning of ethnic independence. Their this cultural and conservative inclinations are advanced with the movement of enhancement of traditional Korean culture which strengthens the class of oneself and a location of thoughts when capital-nationalists performed 'Culture movement' within the system under 'Culture politics' of the Japanese imperialism in 1920's.
목차
1. 序論
2. 동아시아의 近代化와 國粹論의 형성
3. 1910년대 新知識層의 思想動向과 國粹觀
4. 文化主義 國粹保存運動의 전개
5. 結論
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Political Thought behind Korean National
Korea Journal
1976 .04
-
해방 후 國史敎科의 社會科化와 ‘國史科’의 置廢
역사교육
2006 .06
-
우리나라 전통 문화 정책의 전개 과정과 그 의미
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2000 .12
-
1970년대 ‘민족문화’ 담론과 한국학 : 분단인식과 관련하여
어문론집
2013 .06
-
조지훈의 민족문화 인식 방법과 그 내용
한국시학연구
2008 .12
-
National Literature of Korea
Korea Journal
1974 .08
-
해방이후 우익 민족 담론의 공고화 과정(1945~1953) : 일간지를 중심으로
역사학보
2008 .06
-
National Security in the 1970’s
Korea Journal
1970 .05
-
근대 계몽기 민족주의 형성의 아이러니 : 신채호의 ‘국수(國粹)’ 이념을 중심으로
우리말글
2017 .03
-
한말·일제시대 최남선의 문명·문화론
동방학지
2008 .01
-
21세기 민족문화진흥의 새로운 모색을 위한 제언
국학연구
2006 .06
-
위기감과 자부심 사이 : 북한 ‘민족문화’ 개념의 분화와 변화
역사비평
2018 .02
-
근대 중국의 민족제국주의와 단일민족론
동북아역사논총
2009 .03
-
1920~30년대 日帝의 朝鮮文化 支配政策
역사교육
2000 .09
-
한국 종교교단의 `국학 운동`
종교연구
2013 .03
-
통일언어철학의 탐색방향
어문학
2006 .03
-
민족정신의 현재적 의미와 민족사상
고조선단군학
2005 .06
-
해방정국기 민족문화 재건 논의의 내용과 성격
사학연구
2008 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-374-015491278