지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The Netherlands tried to find a European solution for their agricultural problem after the end of WWII. The first arena was the Benelux conference. But the Netherlands failed because Belgium argued that a minimum price system be introduced by agricultural trade between two countries. From 1950 on, the Netherlands sought a wider arena, i. e. 'Six community' of the European Coal and Steel Community. The Six parties conference - specially the Netherlands and France - could not come to a agreement on the objects of agricultural integration, the common tariff to the third country, and the participation of the Great Britain. Finally in 1954 this conference resulted in failing.
The Hague government was offered another chance for their agricultural European solution in 1955 when the conference for a European economic community began. But in the first phase, except for the Netherlands there was no country that was interested in the agricultural problem. From the beginning of 1956 the agricultural integration was presented on a main agenda owing to the interest of France. Although several articles on a common agricultural policy was introduced into the EEC agreement, also in this case, the Netherlands did not succeed in laying a free trade system for a European agricultural common market because of France's insistence on the minimum price system like the argument of Belgium. But all the interests of the Netherlands was not neglected. The EEC was not bad for the second and the third industry of the Netherlands, and the German market for livestock/diary industry and horticulture was opened to the Netherlands. In this point, the Dutch European agricultural policy did not fail completely.
This result lay not in the Dutch ill-made strategy, but in a very restricted power of a small country in the European state system in 1950s. Especially, it is necessary to pay attention to the structure of the European integration in 1950s, namely 'the axis of Washington-Paris-Bonn' which was led by France and West-Germany and fully supported by the U.S.. France took advantage of its status as the most important country in this structure. One of her interests was a Europeanization of French agricultural protection. A small country like the Netherlands could not realize their aim of a free trade agricultural common market, confronted by the French interest supported by the U.S. and West-Germany.
The Hague government was offered another chance for their agricultural European solution in 1955 when the conference for a European economic community began. But in the first phase, except for the Netherlands there was no country that was interested in the agricultural problem. From the beginning of 1956 the agricultural integration was presented on a main agenda owing to the interest of France. Although several articles on a common agricultural policy was introduced into the EEC agreement, also in this case, the Netherlands did not succeed in laying a free trade system for a European agricultural common market because of France's insistence on the minimum price system like the argument of Belgium. But all the interests of the Netherlands was not neglected. The EEC was not bad for the second and the third industry of the Netherlands, and the German market for livestock/diary industry and horticulture was opened to the Netherlands. In this point, the Dutch European agricultural policy did not fail completely.
This result lay not in the Dutch ill-made strategy, but in a very restricted power of a small country in the European state system in 1950s. Especially, it is necessary to pay attention to the structure of the European integration in 1950s, namely 'the axis of Washington-Paris-Bonn' which was led by France and West-Germany and fully supported by the U.S.. France took advantage of its status as the most important country in this structure. One of her interests was a Europeanization of French agricultural protection. A small country like the Netherlands could not realize their aim of a free trade agricultural common market, confronted by the French interest supported by the U.S. and West-Germany.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 네덜란드 농업경제의 역사와 구조
Ⅲ. 네덜란드 농업문제의 유럽적 해법
Ⅳ. 결론
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
'푸른 유럽(Europe verte)' : 유럽 국민국가들의 농업정책과 농산물시장통합 협상(1950-54)
역사와경계
2004 .12
-
Korean Genre Paintings in the Netherlands and around the World
Korea Journal
1983 .01
-
유럽통합을 위한 역사교육 : 독일의 사례를 중심으로
동북아역사논총
2015 .03
-
영국이 없는 유럽 : 1960년대 ‘프랑스의 유럽’을 위한 드골의 유럽통합 정책
프랑스사 연구
2017 .02
-
영국의 유럽자유무역지대의 구상과 내부 논의
영국 연구
2009 .01
-
평화와 공동번영을 위한 ‘생산의 연대’? ― 프랑스의 유럽석탄철강공동체 계획(슈만플랜)의 기원과 의미(1945 - 1950) ―
프랑스사 연구
2002 .02
-
Agricultural Development and International Cooperation
Korea Journal
1966 .09
-
Agricultural Aspects in Rural Development
Korea Journal
1964 .12
-
다문화사회와 관용, 그리고 ‘비지배자유’
철학논총
2016 .01
-
A Historical Survey of Agricultural Techniques in Korea
Korea Journal
1974 .01
-
EU이후 유럽경제의 변화: 세계화의 대응과“유럽화”
민족연구
2009 .01
-
Conditions of Agricultural Production in North Korea, 1946-1950
Korea Journal
2000 .12
-
발트해무역과 17세기 네덜란드 -곡물교역을 중심으로
동유럽발칸연구
2013 .01
-
독일 중등교육과정의 유럽사 교육에 대한 비판적 고찰 : 사대 주의 김나지움 역사교수계획안(Lehrpläne)을 중심으로
역사교육
2013 .09
-
유럽연합의 확대정책과 과제: 제5차 확대 이후를 중심으로
민족연구
2009 .01
-
유럽의회에서 동유럽국가의 정치경제력 연구
동유럽발칸연구
2011 .01
-
Agricultural Development and Rural Guidance Work
Korea Journal
1972 .04
-
유럽통합 연구사: 정치학과 역사학의 접근
韓國史學史學報
2012 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
유럽통합과 축(軸) : 프-독 축과 이-영 축 에피소드를 중심으로
이선필
국제지역연구
2007
.01
네덜란드 수출농업의 발전과정 : 전후 성장기를 중심으로
송인주
,
윤병선
,
김흥주
산업경제연구
2015
.06
통계로 본 세계 속의 한국농업
심민희
,
채상현
,
장도환
한국농촌경제연구원 기타연구보고
2013
.12
덴마크와 네덜란드의 농업인 육성 및 R&D 정책
이명헌
시선집중 GSnJ
2012
.09
[농업구조 연구 시리즈 7] 네덜란드 농업의 올바른 이해(1) : 착시와 정시
고영곤
,
이정환
시선집중 GSnJ
2010
.05
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-015594015