메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국어문학회 어문학 어문학 제92집
발행연도
2006.6
수록면
19 - 48 (30page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Korean has been generally regarded as a typical language displaying compensatory lengthening(CL, hereafter), since the pioneering work of P-G Lee(1978) in Korean phonology. The analysis of general characteristics of Korean vowel lengthening through hiatus resolution in the previous research has been generally focused on the fundamental characteristics of the mechanism of vowel lengthening proposed for typical CL-languages. This study, however, approaches vowel lengthening in Korean from a totally different view. The basic claim of the present study is that Korean is not a genuine CL-language, even though it exhibits some similar patterns of vowel lengthening as in typical CL-languages. This somewhat contradictory assumption indicates that the analysis of vowel lengthening in Korean needs a more careful investigation. Previous rule- or representation-based accounts have not been successful, especially in the sense that they have not provided a phonologically-convincing motivation of vowel lengthening in Korean. In the present study, vowel lengthening in Korean is analyzed as a foot-based phonological process, mainly relying on the assumption that vowel lengthening can be metrical rather than moraic at least in certain languages.
In this respect, the preservation of timing units or moraic structure, which has been generally proposed in most autosegmental studies on CL, cannot provide sufficient motivation for vowel lengthening at least in Korean. Specifically, it is proposed that Korean vowel lengthening results from an Output-Output Correspondence constraint on metrical (foot) identity between phonological variants in hiatus resolution. Such an analysis captures the intriguing fact that “compensatory” vowel lengthening only occurs in cases where hiatus resolution is optional, but never in cases of obligatory hiatus resolution.

목차

1. 들어가기
2. 보상적 장음화의 보편성
3. 비음절화와 장모음화
4. 장모음화의 음운론적 동인
5. 출력형들 간의 대응관계와 음보
6. 맺음말
참고문헌
저자소개
[Abstract]

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-810-017102960