지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study aims for ascertaining a great influence of the theory of social evolution(Social-Darwinism) on Korean modern novels, especially from the aspect of forming modern discourse.
In early enlightenment period in Korea, modern discourses about self-illumination, modern education, capitalistic economy and international relationship were introduced and applied though rough and clumsy. But the theory of social evolution was the basic and fundamental discourse among the new discourses. The theory made Korean gain comprehensions about modern individuality and nationality and indicate their way of surviving ; the human-society and international relationship is formed by cruel competition as such nature and it is the natural rule that the weak nation is weeded out and perished, therefore Koreans have to make efforts to be a the fittest both sides of individual and nation.
The novels of those days was used as mean of enlightenment of which the theory of social evolution constituted the basic contents. But all writers of those days did not have the same attitude to the theory. On the one hand some writers such as Lee Injick accept the theory at its face value, but on the other hand some writers such as Shin Chaeho rewrote the theory from a standpoint of the weak nation. Especially Shin derived a conception of national subjectivity from the struggle for existence, and the conception was operated as the foundation of combatant nationalism to Imperialism.
Beginning the colonial period, the theory of social evolution was so differently adopted unlike the former times. For representative example, Lee Kwangsu showed a viewpoint of social evolution focused on the cultivation of national ability or the reconstruction of Korean nation instead of combatant nationalism in his novels and articles. Kim, Dong-in and Yeom, Sang-seop showed a narrower viewpoint than Lee, but they focused on the self-awakening of nation constituents. They considered it as the only way of becoming the stronger nation.
In early enlightenment period in Korea, modern discourses about self-illumination, modern education, capitalistic economy and international relationship were introduced and applied though rough and clumsy. But the theory of social evolution was the basic and fundamental discourse among the new discourses. The theory made Korean gain comprehensions about modern individuality and nationality and indicate their way of surviving ; the human-society and international relationship is formed by cruel competition as such nature and it is the natural rule that the weak nation is weeded out and perished, therefore Koreans have to make efforts to be a the fittest both sides of individual and nation.
The novels of those days was used as mean of enlightenment of which the theory of social evolution constituted the basic contents. But all writers of those days did not have the same attitude to the theory. On the one hand some writers such as Lee Injick accept the theory at its face value, but on the other hand some writers such as Shin Chaeho rewrote the theory from a standpoint of the weak nation. Especially Shin derived a conception of national subjectivity from the struggle for existence, and the conception was operated as the foundation of combatant nationalism to Imperialism.
Beginning the colonial period, the theory of social evolution was so differently adopted unlike the former times. For representative example, Lee Kwangsu showed a viewpoint of social evolution focused on the cultivation of national ability or the reconstruction of Korean nation instead of combatant nationalism in his novels and articles. Kim, Dong-in and Yeom, Sang-seop showed a narrower viewpoint than Lee, but they focused on the self-awakening of nation constituents. They considered it as the only way of becoming the stronger nation.
목차
1. 서론
2. 진화론과 사회진화론, 그 원형과 동양적 변용
3. 개화기 소설과 진화론
4. 1910년대 소설과 사회진화론
5. 결론을 대신하여
참고문헌
영문초록
참고문헌 (28)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Case theory
영어영문학
1987 .10
-
'Discourse of the Nation and the Modern' Reflected in Korean History Textbooks
International Journal of Korean History
2002 .12
-
Issues in language evolution
한국언어학회 학술대회지
2009 .12
-
Social Darwinism in Korea and Its Influence on Early Modern Korean Buddhism
International Journal of Korean History
2001 .12
-
한국 현대소설의 서술 기법 및 전략 연구 : 김동인의 소설론을 중심으로
비평문학
2008 .08
-
신학과 과학의 생명기원 논쟁에 대한 고찰 : 다윈의 〈종의 기원〉에 나타난 진화론 비판을 중심으로
창조론오픈포럼
2012 .08
-
민족주의 연구를 둘러싼 새로운 시각
대구사학
2014 .01
-
근대중국의 사회진화론과 양계초** 이연도(李演都)/중앙대학교/조교수
중국학논총
2020 .01
-
Emergence and Evolution of Environmental Discourses in South Korea
Korea Journal
2004 .09
-
한국현대소설연구의 기본과제
한국현대문학연구
2000 .12
-
사회진화론의 수용과 근대시로의 전환
어문연구
2005 .01
-
『무정』의 맥락화와 문학사적 의의
춘원연구학보
2017 .06
-
동아시아 전통사상과 진화론 수용의 계보를 통해 본 한국 근대소설 ② -애국계몽기 이해조·이인직과 1910년대 양건식·이광수의 작품을 중심으로
국제한인문학연구
2019 .01
-
근대소설 형성의 조건들
비평문학
2006 .04
-
Language history and evolution
한국언어학회 학술대회지
2009 .12
-
신소설에 나타난 기독교의 의미-<금수회의록>, <경세종>을 중심으로
한국현대문학연구
1998 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-810-017225320