지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study purports to enhance the quality of researches in the humanities and social sciences by constructing a new evaluation model. The most fundamental problems in the current evaluation system is that it ignores the distinctive characteristics of those disciplines, which is radically different from the natural sciences and engineering, and that it tries to appropriate evaluation tools developed in the latter without discretion.
In constructing a new and alternative evaluation method, this study divides the evaluation realms into two：research proposals and research products. For the proper evaluation of academic journals, this study proposes to revise the evaluation system that is developed by Korea Research Foundation. The current system, which is mainly concerned with the formats of academic journals, can be improved by incorporating more content oriented evaluation criteria in the evaluation of research papers published in the journals. Also, it is very critical to introduce evaluation system in the publication of academic books, which is almost completely absent in current situations. In the evaluation of research proposals for grant applications, this study emphasizes the necessity to remove some evaluation criteria unsuitable for the humanities and social sciences, while adding some new ones specifying the peculiarities of those academic fields.
The most significant implication of this study is that the goal of evaluation system can be fulfilled only when it encourages productive communications between researchers and evaluators. Unilateral decision making on the quality of research products by evaluators will give some necessary information in determining their qualities. It will, however, never provide helpful insights essential to the improvement of the quality of research products until it culminates into reciprocal interactions leading to their revisions.
In constructing a new and alternative evaluation method, this study divides the evaluation realms into two：research proposals and research products. For the proper evaluation of academic journals, this study proposes to revise the evaluation system that is developed by Korea Research Foundation. The current system, which is mainly concerned with the formats of academic journals, can be improved by incorporating more content oriented evaluation criteria in the evaluation of research papers published in the journals. Also, it is very critical to introduce evaluation system in the publication of academic books, which is almost completely absent in current situations. In the evaluation of research proposals for grant applications, this study emphasizes the necessity to remove some evaluation criteria unsuitable for the humanities and social sciences, while adding some new ones specifying the peculiarities of those academic fields.
The most significant implication of this study is that the goal of evaluation system can be fulfilled only when it encourages productive communications between researchers and evaluators. Unilateral decision making on the quality of research products by evaluators will give some necessary information in determining their qualities. It will, however, never provide helpful insights essential to the improvement of the quality of research products until it culminates into reciprocal interactions leading to their revisions.
목차
1. 들어가는 말
2. 기초 학문 분야의 평가 모형 검토
3. 대안적 평가 방안의 모색
4. 맺는말
도움 받은 글
외국어 줄임글
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Criteria for Evaluation
Journal of Qualitative Research
2007 .10
-
2015 개정교육과정에 따른 초등학교 소프트웨어 교육에서의 평가의 현황과 방향
질적연구
2018 .05
-
정보시스템 종합품질평가 모형 연구
대한안전경영과학회지
2006 .01
-
기초연구의 성과평가 기법
한국기술혁신학회 학술대회
1999 .05
-
전국 시‧도교육청 학교평가 현황과 유형 분석을 통한 발전과제 탐색
예술인문사회 융합 멀티미디어 논문지
2018 .01
-
‘평가’를 생각한다
현상과인식
2018 .03
-
다문화가족지원사업 평가지표 개발을 위한 메타평가의 적용
한국가족자원경영학회지
2011 .01
-
서울시 어린이집 평가체계 효율화 방안
서울시 여성가족재단 연구사업보고서
2017 .12
-
The Design and Application of a Meta-evaluation Model for National R&D Programs
기술혁신학회지
2014 .12
-
「현상과인식」에 대한 연구사적 접근
현상과인식
2006 .12
-
국내 인문·사회과학 학술저서 평가를 위한 새로운 시스템의 제언 : 국내외 대학의 사례를 바탕으로
한국콘텐츠학회논문지
2017 .03
-
<인생나눔교실> 사업 평가모형 개발 연구
디지털융복합연구
2018 .01
-
인문ㆍ사회과학과 과학기술부문 협력 방안에 관한 연구
기술혁신학회지
2000 .12
-
ISO 품질평가 체계를 적용한 이러닝 소프트웨어의 사용성 품질평가 기준
디지털융복합연구
2018 .01
-
Quality Evaluation of Video Summaries
한국HCI학회 학술대회
2005 .01
-
치위생학과 팀기반 수업에서 학생평가방법의 비교
한국콘텐츠학회논문지
2018 .05
-
대안적 인사평가제도 : 다면평가의 한계와 과제
현상과인식
2005 .09
-
Scientific Evaluation in Korea
한국기술혁신학회 학술대회
1999 .11
-
개방형 소프트웨어의 품질평가 기준 구축
디지털융복합연구
2013 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-330-017341239