지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
According to the ILO Report of 2001, the average working hours of the Korean workers in 2000 are 2,474, the longest in the world. In October 2000 the Presidential Advisory Tripartite Commission reached an agreement to reduce the working hours up to 40 hours a week and 2000 hours a year.
Although the National Assembly in 1989 revised the labour Standard Act to reduce the maximum weekly working hours from 4S up to 44, the real working hours including overtime are far from the statutory limit. The proposed revision of the LSA for the second time in terms of working hours is considered as an effective effort to reduce the real working hours up to the level of the international standards.
One of the aims of the reduction of the maximum working hours is to realize the social solidarity through job or work sharing in the era of high unemployment. The reduction of working hours will also give us a chance to develop such new industries as leisure and sport business in new markets which will be widened through prolonged holidays.
In the basic agreement of the Tripartite Commission in October 2001 the parties agreed to reduce working hours in such a manner that the standard of living is not reduced in consequence, as is stipulated in the ILO Convention No. 47 of 1935. However, it is hardly to secure through legal provision the concrete manner to compensate the wage, which might be reduced by the reduction of working hours. Therefore, it is suggested that the lost wage should be compensated by collective agreements and administrative directive.
Until now in Korea, the monthly and annual paid holidays have used not to be enjoyed in terms of their genuine purposes. Instead, the workmen used to be working also on those days in order to be paid extra. These practices make it difficult to realize the purpose of the LSA, which was designed to secure humanity in working society. The second point of the reduction of working hours, therefore, is to be concentrated in the realization of monthly and annual paid holidays without reduction of the living standard.
Regarding the argument of extension of flexible working hours from the employers, it is to be reminded that the flexible working hours have been extended in the most European countries in the way of reduction of real working hours to less than 40-hour-week.
Concerning the schedule of the working hour reduction, it is understandable to begin with the public sector including civil servants. However, it should be considered that the public sector is not the very working place worked over the statutory limit. The hardest working places are the small and medium business in manufacturing sector, where the workers have to endure 50-hour-week.
Although the National Assembly in 1989 revised the labour Standard Act to reduce the maximum weekly working hours from 4S up to 44, the real working hours including overtime are far from the statutory limit. The proposed revision of the LSA for the second time in terms of working hours is considered as an effective effort to reduce the real working hours up to the level of the international standards.
One of the aims of the reduction of the maximum working hours is to realize the social solidarity through job or work sharing in the era of high unemployment. The reduction of working hours will also give us a chance to develop such new industries as leisure and sport business in new markets which will be widened through prolonged holidays.
In the basic agreement of the Tripartite Commission in October 2001 the parties agreed to reduce working hours in such a manner that the standard of living is not reduced in consequence, as is stipulated in the ILO Convention No. 47 of 1935. However, it is hardly to secure through legal provision the concrete manner to compensate the wage, which might be reduced by the reduction of working hours. Therefore, it is suggested that the lost wage should be compensated by collective agreements and administrative directive.
Until now in Korea, the monthly and annual paid holidays have used not to be enjoyed in terms of their genuine purposes. Instead, the workmen used to be working also on those days in order to be paid extra. These practices make it difficult to realize the purpose of the LSA, which was designed to secure humanity in working society. The second point of the reduction of working hours, therefore, is to be concentrated in the realization of monthly and annual paid holidays without reduction of the living standard.
Regarding the argument of extension of flexible working hours from the employers, it is to be reminded that the flexible working hours have been extended in the most European countries in the way of reduction of real working hours to less than 40-hour-week.
Concerning the schedule of the working hour reduction, it is understandable to begin with the public sector including civil servants. However, it should be considered that the public sector is not the very working place worked over the statutory limit. The hardest working places are the small and medium business in manufacturing sector, where the workers have to endure 50-hour-week.
목차
Ⅰ. 신노동사회의 패러다임과 근로시간단축
Ⅱ. 노동시간 단축의 의의와 방향
Ⅲ. 쟁점별 노사 및 공익위원 입장 비교
Ⅳ. 쟁점별 검토
참고문헌
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
근로시간운용의 탄력화에 관한 비교법적 고찰 : 유럽 주요국가의 근로시간법제 변화를 중심으로
노동법논총
2010 .04
-
대만 변형근로시간 제도
중국법연구
2012 .01
-
근로시간 단축의 제도적 논의와 쟁점
노동법학
2020 .03
-
근로시간 단축법 개정의 경과와 쟁점
노동법포럼
2018 .07
-
연장근로와 휴일근로
노동법학
2014 .09
-
표준수업시수제 도입에 관한 교원의 인식 연구
교육과학연구
2015 .09
-
근로시간특례제도의 문제점과 개선방안
노동법논총
2011 .12
-
주40시간제 도입과 기업의 교육훈련투자
산업관계연구
2015 .03
-
일본 변형근로시간제도에 관한 연구
산업관계연구
2019 .06
-
근로시간 제도의 합리적 구축방안에 관한 연구
노동법포럼
2012 .10
-
근로시간 단축의 쟁점과 과제
질서경제저널
2014 .01
-
장시간근로 완화를 위한 제도적 개선방안
원광법학
2009 .01
-
주 40시간 근로제관련 근로기준법 개정과 그 시행에 따르는 법률문제
노동법연구
2004 .12
-
현행 재량근로제의 내용과 문제점
노동법연구
2001 .12
-
근로시간 적용제외에 관한 근로기준법 제63조의 기원에 관한 연구
동북아법연구
2017 .01
-
미국의 근로시간법제에 관한 연구
법학연구
2019 .09
-
한국 노인 자원봉사자의 특성, 횟수와 시간, 그리고 자원봉사 영향요인 연구
노인복지연구
2013 .12
-
시간외근로의 쟁점과 과제
노동법포럼
2014 .04
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-360-016009356