지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
During the early 1920s, democracy was considered as a new form of philosophy, which could support the ambitious plans hatched by the new generation of intellectuals who intended to resist the Japanese imperial authorities while also uniting the Joseon community. In the wake of all kinds of discourses that were supporting reformation of the Korean people, the intellectuals perceived democracy as a logical ideology that could be effective in the future in addressing various issues with nature either foreign or domestic. In other words, they wished to use the democratic theories to their advantages, and unite the Joseon society while fundamentally attacking the colonial ruling.
Based upon this perception, they argued that democracy was a specific notion regarding the very structure of the society based upon concepts such as freedom and equality, and not just a theory urging people’s participation in politics. They reasoned that democracy based upon freedom and equality was the most powerful weapon that the Joseon people could use against their struggle with either the Japanese imperial ruling or the imposed age of modernity. This level of progressiveness even allowed factions which would turn into Socialist factions in the following few years to join forces with the intellectuals in the early 1920s.
Yet this democracy discourse was not quite strongly established as a philosophical system that could also well respond to the terms of reality. It was rather ultimately a theory and argument constructed upon an optimistic and ideal view of the future. Therefore, it lacked a certain amount of consideration for the inherent social conflicts and colliding reality of terms. It also exhibited a reasoning with quite an abstract and naive nature that believed freedom and equality could be connected with each other through a social consciousness and determination.
All these elements served as a weakness for the democracy discourse, and relevant discussions never had the chance to evolve to the next level of being a realistic argument urging actual practice and aspiring for values like freedom and equality. Instead, in the wake of various forms of diversifications that continued among political factions, the discourse was transformed into an argument that could be labelled as a notion of Bourgeois Democracy, supporting the Bourgeois factions’ participation in politics.
Yet, on the other hand, the discourse of democracy in the early 1920s did not zero-in upon the issue of social classes that much, and was primarily interested in pursuing basic and universal virtues such as freedom and equality. So the possibility of future resurgence of the discourse or the remodification of that discourse remained as a strong possibility. The continuation and the changes the democracy discourse went through in the mid-1920s, will later be examined as well.
Based upon this perception, they argued that democracy was a specific notion regarding the very structure of the society based upon concepts such as freedom and equality, and not just a theory urging people’s participation in politics. They reasoned that democracy based upon freedom and equality was the most powerful weapon that the Joseon people could use against their struggle with either the Japanese imperial ruling or the imposed age of modernity. This level of progressiveness even allowed factions which would turn into Socialist factions in the following few years to join forces with the intellectuals in the early 1920s.
Yet this democracy discourse was not quite strongly established as a philosophical system that could also well respond to the terms of reality. It was rather ultimately a theory and argument constructed upon an optimistic and ideal view of the future. Therefore, it lacked a certain amount of consideration for the inherent social conflicts and colliding reality of terms. It also exhibited a reasoning with quite an abstract and naive nature that believed freedom and equality could be connected with each other through a social consciousness and determination.
All these elements served as a weakness for the democracy discourse, and relevant discussions never had the chance to evolve to the next level of being a realistic argument urging actual practice and aspiring for values like freedom and equality. Instead, in the wake of various forms of diversifications that continued among political factions, the discourse was transformed into an argument that could be labelled as a notion of Bourgeois Democracy, supporting the Bourgeois factions’ participation in politics.
Yet, on the other hand, the discourse of democracy in the early 1920s did not zero-in upon the issue of social classes that much, and was primarily interested in pursuing basic and universal virtues such as freedom and equality. So the possibility of future resurgence of the discourse or the remodification of that discourse remained as a strong possibility. The continuation and the changes the democracy discourse went through in the mid-1920s, will later be examined as well.
목차
서론
1. 1910년대 신지식인층의 현실인식과 대정데모크라시
2. 1920년대 초 민주주의론의 등장과정과 그 성격
3. 민주주의론의 전개와 부르주아민주주의론으로의 전환
결론
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (61)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
서양의 민주주의 : 이념과 변용
역사와현실
2013 .03
-
경제민주주의의 상호주관적 정당화와 해명
대동철학
2016 .01
-
A Better Democracy, A Better Economy
계간 사상
1999 .06
-
근대 한국 민주주의 문화의 전통 수립과 특질
역사와현실
2013 .03
-
Long Road to Democracy
Korea Journal
1970 .08
-
DEMOCRACY ON TRIAL
Korea Journal
1961 .09
-
1950년대 엘리트 지식인의 민주주의 인식 : 조병옥과 유진오를 중심으로
사학연구
2008 .03
-
민주주의라는 삶의 양식과 그 인간적 이상 : 한국 민주주의의 민주화라는 과제와 관련하여
사회와 철학
2014 .04
-
Practice and Ideal of Korean Democracy
Korea Journal
1967 .03
-
Historical Characteristics of Korea's Social Democracy
International Journal of Korean History
2002 .12
-
Economic Development and Democracy : Korea as a New Model?
Korea Journal
1995 .06
-
신민주주의, 20세기 중국의 정치유산
역사와현실
2013 .03
-
한국 민주주의의 성찰과 전망
역사와현실
2013 .03
-
Democracy and the Economic Crisis
Korea Journal
2000 .06
-
대안적 민주주의 모델로서 '종합적ㆍ포괄적 민주주의' - 비판적 검토 -
사회와 철학
2005 .10
-
민주주의와 삶 : 미셸 앙리의 민주주의 비판
현상학과 현대철학
2017 .09
-
역사교과서 속의 민주주의 : 한중일 3국 비교
역사교육
2014 .12
-
역대 대한민국 헌법의 민주주의와 자유민주적 기본질서
역사와현실
2011 .12
-
Civil Society and Local Democracy
Korea Journal
2006 .12
-
South Korea Struggles Toward Democracy
Korea Journal
1963 .11
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-016474629