지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In addition to the traders who were dependent on peddling, the government-patronized merchants took charge of commercial activities in Gaesung. The government-patronized street, commercial center in Gaesung's downtown was situated on both sides of the main road of the South Gate. This was a business quarter composed of many patronized and private merchants. Twenty patronized stores existed, including four great stores. The patronized stores had system of a mutual-aid society mainly.
Four great patronized stores had a character of common meeting body of high rank organization, and right to investigate and settle all the commercial entanglements there under the mandate of administrative office. They had privileges similar to those of six stores in Seoul. Therefore, they bore the burden of much material and commercial tax than any other patronized stores.
The exclusive right to goods of patronized stores was important in terms of the commercial power. The right in Gaesung was effective other than that in Seoul as late as the mid-19th century. In 1855, for exampel, private merchants was punished on complaint of patronized stores.
The financial operation in Gaesungbu rested on the commercial tax and increase of interest, which meant that patronized and private stores had some relation to finance of government office. The guild of patronized stores was supposed to pay its taxes to government office regularly, but amount to be borne mattered as time went by. Therefore, patronized stores had to pay their taxes to government office without fail, because it came into close relation to financial standing and operational system.
The operational method of patronized stores in Gaesung was the same as that in Seoul. It was confirmed in way that government investigated the problems of operation of patronized stores. This matter was associated with the financial problem of Gaesung, commercial taxes, and the collection of taxes from patronized stores.
The privileged loan was made between government office and patronized stores. If patronized stores suffered from the financial difficulties, it was made at the request of patronized stores. Both patronized and private merchants in Gaesung borrowed money. For example, townsmen in Gaesung borrowed silver coins of a hundred thousand in 1730, and so on.
Gaesung was distinctive in that it lend a huge amount of loan to all the merchants of the first, the second, and the third grades as well as patronized merchants regularly, and stimulated commerce. It maintained the system of patronized stores by collecting interest mainly. It could be examined through the examples of exclusive right, commercial tax, price of goods delivered as a tax, and collection of tax, and so on in general patronized stores, including the four great patronized stores in the 18th and 19th centuries.
Four great patronized stores had a character of common meeting body of high rank organization, and right to investigate and settle all the commercial entanglements there under the mandate of administrative office. They had privileges similar to those of six stores in Seoul. Therefore, they bore the burden of much material and commercial tax than any other patronized stores.
The exclusive right to goods of patronized stores was important in terms of the commercial power. The right in Gaesung was effective other than that in Seoul as late as the mid-19th century. In 1855, for exampel, private merchants was punished on complaint of patronized stores.
The financial operation in Gaesungbu rested on the commercial tax and increase of interest, which meant that patronized and private stores had some relation to finance of government office. The guild of patronized stores was supposed to pay its taxes to government office regularly, but amount to be borne mattered as time went by. Therefore, patronized stores had to pay their taxes to government office without fail, because it came into close relation to financial standing and operational system.
The operational method of patronized stores in Gaesung was the same as that in Seoul. It was confirmed in way that government investigated the problems of operation of patronized stores. This matter was associated with the financial problem of Gaesung, commercial taxes, and the collection of taxes from patronized stores.
The privileged loan was made between government office and patronized stores. If patronized stores suffered from the financial difficulties, it was made at the request of patronized stores. Both patronized and private merchants in Gaesung borrowed money. For example, townsmen in Gaesung borrowed silver coins of a hundred thousand in 1730, and so on.
Gaesung was distinctive in that it lend a huge amount of loan to all the merchants of the first, the second, and the third grades as well as patronized merchants regularly, and stimulated commerce. It maintained the system of patronized stores by collecting interest mainly. It could be examined through the examples of exclusive right, commercial tax, price of goods delivered as a tax, and collection of tax, and so on in general patronized stores, including the four great patronized stores in the 18th and 19th centuries.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 조선후기 개성상업 발달의 조건
Ⅲ. 18ㆍ19세기 개성의 시전과 상업관행
Ⅳ. 맺음말
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
개성상인과 정치권력
역사와실학
2015 .11
-
개항기 경제 변동과 개성상인의 활동
역사와실학
2014 .11
-
조선시대 개성 출신인의 지역 인식
역사와 세계
2013 .06
-
조선후기 開城의 도시구조와 상업
지방사와 지방문화
2009 .05
-
패밀리 레스토랑의 관계마케팅활동이 만족, 전환행동 및 점포 애호도에 미치는 영향관계
한국식생활문화학회지
2004 .01
-
1910-20년대 개성상인의 백삼(白蔘) 상품화와 판매 확대 활동
의사학
2011 .06
-
조선시대 개성의 演福寺를 통해본 지역성 탐색
역사와 담론
2010 .08
-
패션소매점포 매장 인테리어 색상의 친환경 점포 이미지에 미치는 영향 및 소비자 환경인식 조절 효과 연구
복식문화연구
2018 .01
-
原三國~百濟 圓形 貯藏孔의 型式과 性格
역사와 담론
2010 .12
-
일제시기 백화점과 일상소비문화
동양고전연구
2006 .01
-
하이브리드 카페에서 친환경 패션제품의 판매가 소비자가 인식하는 매장이미지 및 음식의 구매의도에 미치는 영향
한국식생활문화학회지
2019 .01
-
1950년대 후반 세제개혁과 미국 조세고문단의 활동
역사와현실
2017 .09
-
고전문학에 그려진 개성상인 형상 연구
열상고전연구
2018 .01
-
커피전문점의 환경마케팅이 소비자 신뢰 및 충성도에 미치는 영향
한국식생활문화학회지
2012 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-014639553