메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국시학회 한국시학연구 한국시학연구 제9호
발행연도
2003.11
수록면
7 - 30 (24page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Buddhism attracts less attention than Confucianism because the religion is associated with unworldliness. The principle of escape from the mundane world and rejection of family ideology are two main bases for transcendence pursued by Buddhism. Such transcendence becomes a factor which contributes to incompatibility between Buddhist speculation or imagination and modernity. For this reason, Buddhism couldm't be an alternative to Confucianism in modern society characterized by the dissolution of order based on philosophy of the Chinese Song.
Buddhist speculations reflected in Han Yong Woon's poems may be defined as demonstrations of resistance. In his works, the poet created a self who sought to achieve modernity through resistance in the form of tradition. However, the self was not realized, but just wished to be as suggested in the existence of 'the beloved' as a character. The poet couldn't find a medium between modernity and Buddha. The source of poems by Seo Jeong Joo was his own culture. Therefore, his earlier works were not based on Buddhist imagination. In earlier days of writing poems, Seo Jeong Joo oriented towards the Western idea of modernity - deconstruction, introduced through Japan, rather than seeking towards tradition. His adaptation of Nitsche's aesthetic primitivism in writing poems tended to be superficial rather than be associated with reality. This led to the result that the poet accepted Asianism as the idea of colonialism without big conflict. In using Shilla(新羅) and Buddhism as poetic themes, the poet stood on a principle that aesthetic primitivism, the Western idea of modernity-deconstruction and orientalism were all equal. Traditional aspects found in his works written during the late period of Japanese colonial rule were regarded consistently corresponding to lay mysticism. For Seo Jeong Joo, Buddhist imagination was a system characterized by irresponsibility, transcendence and aesthetics that nullified worldly values and order. Cho Ji Hoon employed Buddhism from his own methodological view. Seeking both prosody and the discipline of meditation in his works, the poet tried to achieve peace by way of removing troubles on one hand and realize his own virtue on the other hand. Thus Cho Ji Hoon used Buddhism according to Confucianism-based idea of Eunil(隱逸).
Buddhist imagination presented in Korean modern poems had various aspects of ambivalence. This was closely related to such aspects of social conditions based on which the modern poems were formed. In colonial modern society where colonialism and modernity coexisted, tradition couldn't avoid bringing out various contexts of discourse. Han Yong Woon, Seo Jeong Joo and Cho Ji Hoon were different among them in ways of reforming the ambivalence of tradition in colonial modern society. Such ways become bases for understanding different relationships between aesthetics and world view.

목차

1. 불교와 근대
2. 저항의 변증 - 萬海 韓龍雲
3. 세속적 신비주의-未堂 徐廷柱
4. 은일(隱逸)의 의지-지훈 조동탁
5. 근대시와 불교적 상상력의 양면성
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-811-014648440