지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Looking through cultural exchanges between Korea and Japan, we come to know they are so far-reaching that we need to classify them by periods. If we talk about cultural exchanges in modern history, we have to take into account the special delegation called 'Tongsinsa'(organized at the end of Cho-sun dynasty for cultural exchanges between the two countries). It was sent to Japan 12 times.
Cultural exchanges through 'Tongsinsa' have been studied by sector, but as far as I know the painting sector has not included yet.
However, artists used to be accompanied with the delegation to Japan. Judging from writings and paintings that they left, we can realize pictures played an important role in cultural exchanges between the two nations at that time. Therefore, I would like to account for painting exchanges focused on 17-18 centuries in the main text.
We could roughly classify painting fields into two parts: Literati on painting and Minhwa(folk paintings). It is relatively easy to study the former because there are many records and books as well as drawings left by 'Tongsinsa' artists pertaining to it.
However, in case of the latter even though it is obvious that Korea propagated its folk paintings to Japan, we can not know how and when they are sent to Japan. We don't know who sent them, either.
Plausible guess is some members of 'Tongsinsa'(probably in low-class) left Minhwa in Japan when they did home stay on the way to Edo(a district name of Japan).
Regarding Literati on painting, I will talk about the specific period when they were left and artists who played a major role in that period. Also, I will look through the period Japan received them and consider how they changed Japanese painting history.
Regarding Minhwa, I would like to study which kinds of paintings were propagated and how they changed in Japan through traces of Cho-sun paintings left there.
Culture can be accepted as an imitative work at first, but as time goes it comes to assimilate or have a peculiar characteristic based on native traits. Therefore, it can be said that the main text will be the procedure through which a culture is explained and analogized.
Cultural exchanges through 'Tongsinsa' have been studied by sector, but as far as I know the painting sector has not included yet.
However, artists used to be accompanied with the delegation to Japan. Judging from writings and paintings that they left, we can realize pictures played an important role in cultural exchanges between the two nations at that time. Therefore, I would like to account for painting exchanges focused on 17-18 centuries in the main text.
We could roughly classify painting fields into two parts: Literati on painting and Minhwa(folk paintings). It is relatively easy to study the former because there are many records and books as well as drawings left by 'Tongsinsa' artists pertaining to it.
However, in case of the latter even though it is obvious that Korea propagated its folk paintings to Japan, we can not know how and when they are sent to Japan. We don't know who sent them, either.
Plausible guess is some members of 'Tongsinsa'(probably in low-class) left Minhwa in Japan when they did home stay on the way to Edo(a district name of Japan).
Regarding Literati on painting, I will talk about the specific period when they were left and artists who played a major role in that period. Also, I will look through the period Japan received them and consider how they changed Japanese painting history.
Regarding Minhwa, I would like to study which kinds of paintings were propagated and how they changed in Japan through traces of Cho-sun paintings left there.
Culture can be accepted as an imitative work at first, but as time goes it comes to assimilate or have a peculiar characteristic based on native traits. Therefore, it can be said that the main text will be the procedure through which a culture is explained and analogized.
목차
Ⅰ. 머릿말
Ⅱ. 통신사 화원의 역할
Ⅲ. 통신사행화원이 일본 남화에 끼친 영향
Ⅳ. 이조민화가 우끼요에에 끼친 영향
Ⅴ. 맺음말
〈참고문헌〉
도판목록
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
朝鮮 通信使를 통한 회화의 한일교류 : 17~18세기를 중심으로
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2001 .06
-
문화산업 공통발전 가능성에 관한 모색 : 18~19세기에 나타난 동양 삼국의 미인도를 중심으로
동북아 문화연구
2002 .10
-
세 도시 문화산업 공통발전 가능성에 관한 모색 : 18~19세기 한ㆍ중ㆍ일 삼국의 미인도를 중심으로
동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 발표자료집
2002 .06
-
문인화와의 비교를 통해 본, 민화의 개념과 위상
한국민화
2013 .12
-
사의(寫意)와 사생(寫生) 개념 고찰
미술교육연구논총
2019 .01
-
근대 강화지역의 불화제작과 화승
인천학연구
2007 .02
-
동아시아 속의 한국 민화
한국민화
2009 .12
-
‘조선후기 회화’의 연구사 -풍속화의 재발견과 단원 김홍도(檀園 金弘道)-
한국문화연구
2019 .01
-
민화의 원래 의미와 현대적 의미
한국민화
2017 .12
-
민화를 보는 또 하나의 시선: 이우환의 민화론과 민화 컬렉션
한국민화
2019 .04
-
Political Change in Japan and Korea-Japan Relations
국제정치논총
1985 .12
-
예비중등미술교사들의 한국화 체험학습 사례연구
미술교육연구논총
2020 .01
-
민화민속학 시론
한국민화
2017 .12
-
일본의 정보화 : e-Japan과 u-Japan 전략을 중심으로
아시아연구
2006 .03
-
遼墓壁畵所反映的遼代社會生活
중앙아시아연구
2004 .01
-
민화의 성격과 불화와의 관계
한국민화
2013 .12
-
日本語教育と絵画鑑賞‒名画を用いた日本語の授業‒
일본근대학연구
2020 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0