지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The work of historicization largely comprises the historical narration and the history education. In light of the aspect, history is a crisis. First of all, as the historical narration is the basic problem about the definition dubbed 'what history means', it is related to historical identity.
A problem is raised about the scientific historical view, which was defined as 'conversation between the present and the past' based on reality in its previous 'historical fact' due to influence of post-modernism. And, the new historical epistemology is based that is called the component in discourse order, which is formed by the historical narration, simply as text, without being existed the historical fact. Either 'the past fact' or 'historical material' itself is what the current historian cannot actually approach, thereby being unable to see as 'the past reality', and is the result called one 'story', which was decorated with historical imagination. The paradigm conversion is attempted with assertion of being but 'fiction' not 'actuality' while recognizing the so-called historical concept as Linguistic Turn. This is 'anti-history' declaration that rings the knell of history, by regarding even the historical science as the sphere of fiction, not a fact, like literature or art. In the meantime, the evolutionary and progressive historical view is dissected centering on the nation and race, which was pursued by huge discourse in the existing modernism.
And, the historical view of pluralism is pointed, which newly arranges history, by finding out discontinuously several starting points, which are made by accidental elements and devious events, for instance, diversely small stories, which are concealed and hidden by huge narration like the life in an individual and the masses, namely, 'history of oblivion' as 'history of memory.' In other words, the masses' counter-memory is reconstituted by excavating history as life, which had been excluded by the history as science. Thus, it aims to seek for the possibility of new history and to widen horizon of historical perception, by creating the so-called 'micro-history' and 'history from below.' Next, a problem of history education results from the perception that only the text history is the true history, with facing the post-alphabet and image era.
In the current history-education system that is performed with school education centering on textbook, students or the masses obtain information from internet, film, and TV, not from a book, and communicate with the past. Many masses are already enjoying films or TV historical dramas as one history, naturally acquire historical knowledge inside it, and are renewing historical perception. Furthermore, the film shows specifically several aspects, to which the post-modem historical view had pointed, with diverse elements such as story, video image, color, clothing, art, music, and effect, which hadn't been possessed by the book. Thus, it is becoming the big motive in delivering newly lots of historical facts to audiences and in excavating potential history with historical imagination. One good example is Colorful Holiday, which was greatly successful film in box-office by having been released in the latter half of last year, with the matter of Gwangju on the 18th of May.
Ultimately, in order to escape from this crisis, the new conversion of understanding about history is needed. As its one method, the positive attitude and perception are requested, which utilized the image media such as films, TV historical dramas, etc. escaping from 'national history' education centering on the current textbook of having the objective as infusing the national identity and the national ideology. This is the open thinking and the open discourse that elevate the historical thought and the historical imagination, beyond delivering historical knowledge.
A problem is raised about the scientific historical view, which was defined as 'conversation between the present and the past' based on reality in its previous 'historical fact' due to influence of post-modernism. And, the new historical epistemology is based that is called the component in discourse order, which is formed by the historical narration, simply as text, without being existed the historical fact. Either 'the past fact' or 'historical material' itself is what the current historian cannot actually approach, thereby being unable to see as 'the past reality', and is the result called one 'story', which was decorated with historical imagination. The paradigm conversion is attempted with assertion of being but 'fiction' not 'actuality' while recognizing the so-called historical concept as Linguistic Turn. This is 'anti-history' declaration that rings the knell of history, by regarding even the historical science as the sphere of fiction, not a fact, like literature or art. In the meantime, the evolutionary and progressive historical view is dissected centering on the nation and race, which was pursued by huge discourse in the existing modernism.
And, the historical view of pluralism is pointed, which newly arranges history, by finding out discontinuously several starting points, which are made by accidental elements and devious events, for instance, diversely small stories, which are concealed and hidden by huge narration like the life in an individual and the masses, namely, 'history of oblivion' as 'history of memory.' In other words, the masses' counter-memory is reconstituted by excavating history as life, which had been excluded by the history as science. Thus, it aims to seek for the possibility of new history and to widen horizon of historical perception, by creating the so-called 'micro-history' and 'history from below.' Next, a problem of history education results from the perception that only the text history is the true history, with facing the post-alphabet and image era.
In the current history-education system that is performed with school education centering on textbook, students or the masses obtain information from internet, film, and TV, not from a book, and communicate with the past. Many masses are already enjoying films or TV historical dramas as one history, naturally acquire historical knowledge inside it, and are renewing historical perception. Furthermore, the film shows specifically several aspects, to which the post-modem historical view had pointed, with diverse elements such as story, video image, color, clothing, art, music, and effect, which hadn't been possessed by the book. Thus, it is becoming the big motive in delivering newly lots of historical facts to audiences and in excavating potential history with historical imagination. One good example is Colorful Holiday, which was greatly successful film in box-office by having been released in the latter half of last year, with the matter of Gwangju on the 18th of May.
Ultimately, in order to escape from this crisis, the new conversion of understanding about history is needed. As its one method, the positive attitude and perception are requested, which utilized the image media such as films, TV historical dramas, etc. escaping from 'national history' education centering on the current textbook of having the objective as infusing the national identity and the national ideology. This is the open thinking and the open discourse that elevate the historical thought and the historical imagination, beyond delivering historical knowledge.
목차
1. 들어가는 말
2. 역사란 무엇인가
3. 영화와 역사의 만남
4. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (27)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
영화의 역사적 방법론에 대한 고찰
영화연구
2004 .06
-
역사극, 무대로 나온 역사: 역사극의 기원, 개념, 범주
드라마연구
2010 .01
-
2000년 이후 TV사극의상 디자인 연구
한국의류학회지
2016 .01
-
디자인 역사
한국디자인학회 국제학술대회 논문집
2010 .10
-
역사 연구방법에서 디자인사의 위치와 방향
Archives of Design Research
2000 .05
-
'한국회화사' 재구축의 과제 : 근대적 학문의 틀을 넘어서
미술사학연구(구 고고미술)
2004 .03
-
한국미술사연구의 과제와 방법론
미술사학연구(구 고고미술)
2004 .03
-
영화와 국가, 중층적 의미작용에 관한 고찰 : 70년대 사극과 한국영화 르네상스시대 대중영화들을 통과하며
영화연구
2003 .12
-
한국디자인사 연구의 문화사적 접근을 향하여
한국디자인학회 국제학술대회 논문집
2004 .10
-
역사극의 탈역사화 경향: 역사의 유희와 일상사적 역사 쓰기
한국연극학
2012 .01
-
한국의 역사주의 연주: 그 현재와 미래 조망
음악과 문화
2007 .01
-
TV 사극 변천에 따른 드라마 의상의 변화와 가치분석 -MBC 사극을 중심으로-
한국의류학회지
2008 .01
-
TV 사극드라마 의상에 관한 기초연구
한복문화
2016 .06
-
무용사 연구의 새로운 지평:구술사의 활용과 과제 모색
대한무용학회논문집
2011 .01
-
역사에 대한 '문학적 상상력'으로서의 기억 : 〈실미도〉를 중심으로 역사-석사 영화 다시 생각하기
영화연구
2005 .08
-
사진의 담론과 역사의 담론
서양미술사학회논문집
1999 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
영화의 역사적 방법론에 대한 고찰
허훈
영화연구
2004
.06
영화관객 연구: 인터넷 시대의 관객 능동성 : 〈워낭소리〉의 사례를 중심으로
이윤희
영화연구
2012
.06
아리스토텔레스의 ‘시학’을 통해서 본 영화의 대중성 연구 : 영화〈사랑〉과 〈달콤한 인생〉의 플롯 구조 비교 분석
김혜원
영화연구
2011
.12
1950~60년대 한일 청춘 영화 비교 연구 : 청춘 영화에 나타난 근대/국가를 중심으로
정수완
영화연구
2005
.08
희생양, 그리고 민족적 알레고리로서 여성이이미지 분석 : 이두용 감독의 〈뽕〉을 중심으로
맹수진
영화연구
2004
.12
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0