지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The get-passive seems to focus more on the action than on the result. However, as it is greatly limited, it is not freely interchangeable with the be-passive.
It is presumably because of the emphasis which the get-passive puts on the subject rather than the agent and on what happens to the subject as a result of the event that the agent is less usual with the get-passive. However, if the agents refer to specific meaning, even human agents become acceptable.
The get-passive, unlike the be-passive, is frequently used to reflect the attitude of the speaker toward the events initiated by the intent of the subject. The speaker's attitude, aided by the context, determines which of the two interpretations 'beneficial' or 'adversative' is appropriate.
A major difference between the be- and get-passives involves the matter of intent or control, the very core transitivity feature of agentivity, In the be-passive, the agent retains intent and control over event, whereas in the get-passive it is the patient-subject that remains in agentive control.
It is noted that the active-agentive nature of the patient-subject of the get-passive is related to the reflexive form of an active-agentive construction and the two meanings of the real verb get.
It is because of the very agentive nature of the patient-subject that the get-passive has both the passive and the active nature of semantic characteristics.
It is presumably because of the emphasis which the get-passive puts on the subject rather than the agent and on what happens to the subject as a result of the event that the agent is less usual with the get-passive. However, if the agents refer to specific meaning, even human agents become acceptable.
The get-passive, unlike the be-passive, is frequently used to reflect the attitude of the speaker toward the events initiated by the intent of the subject. The speaker's attitude, aided by the context, determines which of the two interpretations 'beneficial' or 'adversative' is appropriate.
A major difference between the be- and get-passives involves the matter of intent or control, the very core transitivity feature of agentivity, In the be-passive, the agent retains intent and control over event, whereas in the get-passive it is the patient-subject that remains in agentive control.
It is noted that the active-agentive nature of the patient-subject of the get-passive is related to the reflexive form of an active-agentive construction and the two meanings of the real verb get.
It is because of the very agentive nature of the patient-subject that the get-passive has both the passive and the active nature of semantic characteristics.
목차
1. 머리말
2. get-수동과 be-수동
3. get-수동문과 계사문
4. Chappell의 get-수동 분류
5. get-수동의 의미특성
6. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Be와 Get 수동 구문 번역의 오류 지도 방안
통번역교육연구
2015 .01
-
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF JAPANESE PASSIVE AND KOREAN PASSIVE
언어학
2002 .07
-
把字句와 (역-)피동태에 관한 소고
중국언어연구
2020 .01
-
한국어 피동 표지의 다의성과 습득 양상 -피동과 가능 기능의 구별
이중언어학
2016 .01
-
영어와 한국어 수동문 비교연구
영어영문학연구
2009 .01
-
영어 굴절의 변화와 수동문의 발달 연구
영어영문학연구
2007 .01
-
THE MEANINGS OF THE TWO PASSIVES IN KOREAN
어학연구
1987 .06
-
A Unified Approach to the Get-Passive
언어과학연구
2011 .12
-
日 · 韓受動文の形式と意味の相関性について
일본연구
2018 .08
-
영어 수동구문의 용법과 의미 분석 -중학교 영어 교재를 중심으로-
영어영문학연구
2011 .01
-
중첩피동의 의미기능과 인지구조
어문론집
2007 .09
-
고등학교 영어 교과서의 수동구문 제시방법 분석에 근거한 문법 지도의 문제
영어교과교육
2010 .01
-
On the Structure of English Get-Passives
영어학연구
2006 .01
-
Two different approaches to Sakha passives
알타이학보
2015 .01
-
Get-수동구문의 빈도 및 의미 제약에 관한 코퍼스 기반 연구
영어학연구
2020 .01
-
‘목적어 있는 피동문’에 대한 재고(再考)
어문학
2017 .12
-
자연발생적 사건을 나타내는피동문의 형태․통사․의미적 특성
한민족문화연구
2019 .01
-
뉴스미디어의 수동문 영한번역 연구
언어학
2012 .12
-
한국어 피동사의 상적 의미와 특성 연구
인문언어
2018 .01
-
The Origin of Korean English Learners’ Errors in Translating English Passive Constructions into Korean
통번역교육연구
2017 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0