메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
새한영어영문학회 새한영어영문학 새한영어영문학 제47권 제2호
발행연도
2005.7
수록면
1 - 28 (28page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The American literary space of the late 19th century might be said to be a fighting arena between two forces on issues whether to denounce or accept the past European cultural tradition. The patriotic side would suspect it as a colonial dust of the Old World to be and propose to rebuild the national personality and culture based on unique national experience in the New World. The European, or cosmopolitan side persuaded the nation to consider itself as a part of Europe. They wanted to accept critically the European culture as a reference to American culture.
Ralph Waldo Emerson's poetry and philosophical essays, Nathaniel Hawthorne's romance-novels, and Walt Whitman's poetry were full of romantically democratic spirits. Their works were signs of American cultural independence. By his novel A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court and his travel writings such as The Innocents Abroad and Following the Equator, Mark Twain became the American icon to represent this trend of anti-European patriotism in the 19th century America. On the other side, there were Charles Eliot Norton, Edwin L. Godkin, James T. Fields who were cosmopolitan scholars and journalists. They regarded Henry James as a writer to represent their interests. James seems to be, in many respects, set opposite to Twain; James seems to be, in many respects, set opposite to Twain; for example, their different literary styles, cultural biases, and political attitudes. But their literary and critical works served to attack and reconsider the European culture both directly and indirectly.
Leela Gandhi thinks of two kinds of postcolonial strategies to cave in the center of imperial(ism), One is to refuse and destroy the past legacy and to set up a new national culture in the postcolonial areas. The other is to mimic and appropriate the imperial language and text and expose the instable authority of the center. This is the 'in-betweenness' of the postcolonial literature. Emerson, Hawthorne, Whitman, and Twain seem to be the patriotic one; New England cosmopolitans and Henry James, the other. James's novels, from the earlier work Roderick Hudson and An International Episode through The Portrait of a Lady to The Golden Bowl, have a virtue to be regarded as postcolonial. His American characters mimic and appropriate the language and behavior of the European counterparts, by which they expose the instable authority of the center, that is, the value of the Old World. The American characters, however, are 'in-between'; they are neither European nor American, neither patriotic nor pro-imperial, neither central nor marginal. Rather, they run around between the two conflicting areas of Europe and America, old and new, and imperial and colonial. They are, in the Bakhtinian sense, the dialogical subjects, not monological.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 영국의 문화적 억압과 미국의 탈식민적 저항
Ⅲ. 트웨인의 민족주의적 글쓰기
Ⅳ. 제임스의 탈식민적 틈새전략
Ⅴ. 결론
인용문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (25)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0