지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The protection of investor's securities contributes to financial stability and vice versa. It is a basic characteristic of the multi-tiered securities holding system that investors allow financial intermediary to administer their securities. In this regard, perhaps the most important principle to be observed from an investor protection perspective refers to the protection of investors against any abuse of the investor's securities by financial intermediaries and their creditors. In terms of legal aspects, investor protection requires both preliminary and post protection devices are necessary. Preliminary devices can be provided in several ways.
The first rule of protecting investor's interests concerns the separation of the assets which a financial intermediary holds for its own account from the securities which this financial intermediary holds for its clients(investors). Second rule is that investors should be protected against their intermediary and its creditors by strict bookkeeping rules. Third rule is the prohibition of upper-tier attachment, which means that a creditor cannot attach positions held for its debtor at any level in the chain above its debtor's immediate financial intermediary. Forth rule is that financial intermediaries should be bound to effect only dispositions over securities account on the instructions of the relevant investor or a person that has been duly authorized by him. Final rule is that investors should always be entitled to retrieve the securities to which they are entitled from their financial intermediary.
Next issue is about the shortage of securities and loss-sharing as a result of bankruptcy of financial intermediaries, competing rights over securities and priority. If a loss comes from the shortage of securities in financial intermediary, it should be shared among the account holders(investors) of the particular intermediary in proportion to the quantity and the amount of the securities irrespective of the classification of matching system or non-matching system. There must be clear principles that can apply to competing rights or conflicts of priorities.
Principles for such cases are the principle a) that, with some predetermined exception, any credit records into an account resulting from a valid contract made with good faith shall be protected: b) that the investors must be protected from creditors to the financial intermediaries : c) that, in the case of securities shortage, investors of a same financial intermediary shall maintain the same proportional status over the securities of the same class: d) that, with a certain predetermined exceptions, the account holder who acquired the securities first shall have priority.
The first rule of protecting investor's interests concerns the separation of the assets which a financial intermediary holds for its own account from the securities which this financial intermediary holds for its clients(investors). Second rule is that investors should be protected against their intermediary and its creditors by strict bookkeeping rules. Third rule is the prohibition of upper-tier attachment, which means that a creditor cannot attach positions held for its debtor at any level in the chain above its debtor's immediate financial intermediary. Forth rule is that financial intermediaries should be bound to effect only dispositions over securities account on the instructions of the relevant investor or a person that has been duly authorized by him. Final rule is that investors should always be entitled to retrieve the securities to which they are entitled from their financial intermediary.
Next issue is about the shortage of securities and loss-sharing as a result of bankruptcy of financial intermediaries, competing rights over securities and priority. If a loss comes from the shortage of securities in financial intermediary, it should be shared among the account holders(investors) of the particular intermediary in proportion to the quantity and the amount of the securities irrespective of the classification of matching system or non-matching system. There must be clear principles that can apply to competing rights or conflicts of priorities.
Principles for such cases are the principle a) that, with some predetermined exception, any credit records into an account resulting from a valid contract made with good faith shall be protected: b) that the investors must be protected from creditors to the financial intermediaries : c) that, in the case of securities shortage, investors of a same financial intermediary shall maintain the same proportional status over the securities of the same class: d) that, with a certain predetermined exceptions, the account holder who acquired the securities first shall have priority.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 투자자 증권에 대한 사전적 보호제도
Ⅲ. 금융중개기관 도산 시의 부족증권의 손실분담
Ⅳ. 금융중개기관 도산 시의 권리의 우선관계
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (37)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
證券投資者保護論의 再構成
기업법연구
2007 .09
-
성폭력 범죄피해 아동･장애인을 위한 진술조력인의 한국형 역할모델
피해자학연구
2013 .01
-
자본시장법상 투자자 구분 제도의문제점과 개선방안
일감법학
2013 .01
-
투자자보호법제로서의 한국 자본시장법과 일본 금융상품거래법에 대한 고찰
기업법연구
2012 .06
-
중간상 웹사이트의 초기 품질 및 서비스 가격 결정을 위한 경제 모형
한국경영과학회지
2002 .12
-
Theories and Practices of Electronic Intermediary Use in Export Marketing
한국무역학회 세미나 및 토론회
2009 .08
-
일본 금융상품거래법상 특정투자자제도에 관한 고찰
비교사법
2010 .06
-
서울시 중간지원조직 발전방안
서울연구원 정책과제연구보고서
2018 .06
-
증권회사의 파산과 위험부담에 관한 법적 연구
기업법연구
2017 .03
-
금융중개기관을 통해 간접보유하는 유가증권의 선의취득에 관한 연구
비교사법
2008 .12
-
국제증권거래와 관련한 원천징수제도의 개선에 대한 고찰 : 미국의 QI 제도와 최근 OECD 및 EU에서의 논의내용을 중심으로
증권법연구
2011 .01
-
금융위기와 자본시장법 : 금융소비자보호를 중심으로
비교사법
2010 .03
-
각국 보험가입보조자에 대한 비교연구
법학논집
2004 .01
-
농촌체험관광 중간지원조직 역할에 관한 근거이론적 분석-양평군·이천시 농촌나드리 비교를 중심으로-
농촌계획
2014 .01
-
외국인 투자자의 투자성향과 정보비대칭
국제회계연구
2016 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0