지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Cultural changes can be observed through the window of language. The change in structure of Korean culture in the 19th century, either upper-structure or under-structure, gave impacts upon communication of the time, too. We can see the phenomena in oral as well as written literature.
Korea witnessed collapse of class system and restructuring of economic system in the 19th century. Due to the corrupt politics there arose frequent insurrections in several provinces. In the process of the confused swirl, a new class emerged from the traditional middle class up to the active group of cultural production.
A host of progressive intellects called ‘Silhakpa(實學派)’ formed the cultural upper-structure and tried to find out solutions to the confused reality. Some poets of Sijo(時調) who were from the middle class compiled anthologies of Sijo. Enjoying patrons of Pansori(판소리) expanded from lower class to the royal family.
'Kimsatgat'(김삿갓), a wandering poet, was an example who reflected the change of the upper-structure and the under-structure of Korean culture in the 19th century. He composed poetry by disorganizing spoken language into sarcastic and purposefully ungrammatical written Chinese. Some writers writing in Chinese produced novels to express fierce the change of social and economic base of the time.
While Korea in the 19th century was in a critical situation, there were not a few who searched for new solutions. Jeongyakyong(丁若鏞), a progressive scholar, tried to find the solutions not only in Silhak but also in Western civilization. Choijaewu(崔濟愚), the founder of Donghak(東學), desperately endeavored to find out the solutions through a new religious movement.
There was dynamic conflicts between dissolution of cultural inheritance and the formation of a prospect toward the new culture. It was an age of social disorganization and historical turbulence. The cultural dynamics paved way to new interactions between arts and literature, bringing about the diverse change in each field.
It is regrettable, however, that the cultural dynamics of Korea in the 19th century could not be orderly connected to the culture of the following century. Responsibility of the ruling class and intellects could not be exempted for the cultural disconnection.
Korea witnessed collapse of class system and restructuring of economic system in the 19th century. Due to the corrupt politics there arose frequent insurrections in several provinces. In the process of the confused swirl, a new class emerged from the traditional middle class up to the active group of cultural production.
A host of progressive intellects called ‘Silhakpa(實學派)’ formed the cultural upper-structure and tried to find out solutions to the confused reality. Some poets of Sijo(時調) who were from the middle class compiled anthologies of Sijo. Enjoying patrons of Pansori(판소리) expanded from lower class to the royal family.
'Kimsatgat'(김삿갓), a wandering poet, was an example who reflected the change of the upper-structure and the under-structure of Korean culture in the 19th century. He composed poetry by disorganizing spoken language into sarcastic and purposefully ungrammatical written Chinese. Some writers writing in Chinese produced novels to express fierce the change of social and economic base of the time.
While Korea in the 19th century was in a critical situation, there were not a few who searched for new solutions. Jeongyakyong(丁若鏞), a progressive scholar, tried to find the solutions not only in Silhak but also in Western civilization. Choijaewu(崔濟愚), the founder of Donghak(東學), desperately endeavored to find out the solutions through a new religious movement.
There was dynamic conflicts between dissolution of cultural inheritance and the formation of a prospect toward the new culture. It was an age of social disorganization and historical turbulence. The cultural dynamics paved way to new interactions between arts and literature, bringing about the diverse change in each field.
It is regrettable, however, that the cultural dynamics of Korea in the 19th century could not be orderly connected to the culture of the following century. Responsibility of the ruling class and intellects could not be exempted for the cultural disconnection.
목차
1. 문화의 개념과 실제
2. 문화와 언어와 문학
3. 19세기 한국 문화의 하부구조의 양상
4. 19세기 한국 문화의 상부구조의 변화
5. 19세기 한국 문화와 국문학
6. 마무리
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
문화 커뮤니케이션의 구조
대동철학
2005 .01
-
이명박 정부 이후 문화정책의 변화와 문화민주주의에 대한 연구 : 이명박 정부의 문화정책 평가를 중심으로
인문콘텐츠
2014 .03
-
민속문화의 공유 가치와 민중의 문화주권
한국민속학
2004 .12
-
문화콘텐츠화 사업에서 '문화원형' 개념의 함의와 한계
인문콘텐츠
2005 .12
-
문화/콘텐츠 연구의 현안과 과제 : 세계화에서 지역세계화로, 문화대차에서 문화다양성으로
동서사상
2012 .08
-
한국 지역문화정책의 한계와 과제
한국사상과 문화
2016 .01
-
문화, 문화학, 문화철학
사회와 철학
2004 .04
-
초등 KSL 교재 『표준 한국어』의 문화 내용 분석
국어교육연구
2019 .06
-
문화철학과 문화학
철학탐구
2005 .05
-
패션 산업의 변화와 한국적 이미지
비교민속학
2004 .08
-
문화민주주의와 프랑스의 문화예술 지원정책 : 문화 축제를 중심으로
프랑스어권 문화예술연구
2017 .02
-
고구려의 문화상품 디자인 콘텐츠 개발
고구려발해연구
2008 .07
-
한일 문화번역과 청년문화의 경계설정
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2009 .03
-
문화유산을 활용한 한국어 문화교육 방안 연구 - 고급 학습자를 중심으로
한국문예비평연구
2019 .01
-
21세기 문화관광자원의 민속학적 고찰
한국사상과 문화
2012 .01
-
남북한 문화갈등을 대비하는 통일교육 연구: 문화다양성 관점을 중심으로
담론201
2020 .01
-
문화연구와 ‘휴머니티’의 과제
아시아문화연구
2010 .05
-
2015 개정 교육과정에 따른 초등학교 3 · 4학년군 영어 교과서의 문화 다양성 분석
언어과학연구
2018 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0