지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study is on the early development of the Mongol national movement for unity pursued at the time of its independence in 1911.
The first chapter examines that the movement for national unity right after the declaration of independence in 1911 was not an unexpected incident but a deliberate attempt as part of the independent movement. Understanding the independence from the Qing dynasty as the unity of all Mongol tribes, the Inner and Outer Mongol Nobles had closely cooperated each other since the 1890s. They even tried to ask the assistance from Russia to achieve their goals. In addition to Inner and Outer Mongols, Western Mongol participated in the secret meeting at the Mountain Bogd (August, 1911) which made the final decision for the independence. It was also a strategy for national unity that Khasian of Inner Mongol joined the delegations for visiting Russia.
The second chapter studies the propaganda the new government initiated for the national unity. Analyzing the Lunden of Jetsundamba issued immediately after the declaration, I confirm the Mongol Nobles understands the independence as the national unity. I further study the process the independent movement manifested through the letters from the temporary government at Khuree to various Mongol tribes. Despite the ambiguous attitude some Nobles showed, the attempts the new government made for the unity brought the intention from the tribes even in Xinjiang and Qinghai to join the unification.
The third chapter studies the inauguration of the new national head, the organization of the cabinet as Five Part, and the war for unifying Khalkha as part of the national movement. The inauguration of Jevtsundamba was considered as the birth of all Mongol rulers equivalent to Chingiz Khaan. The official title of the new ruler, Olnoo orgogdson Mongol ulsyn ezen, Shashin toriig khoslon barigch naran gerelt Bogd Khaan, also signifies the national unity. The appointment of Inner Mongolians to the key positions in the new government further aimed the unity. The analysis of the wars for unifying Khalkha such as Uliastai and Khovd finally shows the procedure, in which the plan for the unity was realized with the independence.
The first chapter examines that the movement for national unity right after the declaration of independence in 1911 was not an unexpected incident but a deliberate attempt as part of the independent movement. Understanding the independence from the Qing dynasty as the unity of all Mongol tribes, the Inner and Outer Mongol Nobles had closely cooperated each other since the 1890s. They even tried to ask the assistance from Russia to achieve their goals. In addition to Inner and Outer Mongols, Western Mongol participated in the secret meeting at the Mountain Bogd (August, 1911) which made the final decision for the independence. It was also a strategy for national unity that Khasian of Inner Mongol joined the delegations for visiting Russia.
The second chapter studies the propaganda the new government initiated for the national unity. Analyzing the Lunden of Jetsundamba issued immediately after the declaration, I confirm the Mongol Nobles understands the independence as the national unity. I further study the process the independent movement manifested through the letters from the temporary government at Khuree to various Mongol tribes. Despite the ambiguous attitude some Nobles showed, the attempts the new government made for the unity brought the intention from the tribes even in Xinjiang and Qinghai to join the unification.
The third chapter studies the inauguration of the new national head, the organization of the cabinet as Five Part, and the war for unifying Khalkha as part of the national movement. The inauguration of Jevtsundamba was considered as the birth of all Mongol rulers equivalent to Chingiz Khaan. The official title of the new ruler, Olnoo orgogdson Mongol ulsyn ezen, Shashin toriig khoslon barigch naran gerelt Bogd Khaan, also signifies the national unity. The appointment of Inner Mongolians to the key positions in the new government further aimed the unity. The analysis of the wars for unifying Khalkha such as Uliastai and Khovd finally shows the procedure, in which the plan for the unity was realized with the independence.
목차
1. 서론
2. 독립과 민족 통합의 모색
3. 독립 선언과 귀부 권유
4. 젭춘담바의 즉위와 할하의 통합
5. 결론
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
1231ㆍ1232년 對蒙 表文을 통해 본 고려의 몽고에 대한 외교적 대응
한국사학보
2009 .08
-
고려의 對蒙 대응 논리와 ‘大國이미지’ : 1231, 1232년 외교문서를 중심으로
한국사학보
2015 .11
-
1356(공민왕 5)~1369년(공민왕 18) 고려-몽골(원) 관계의 성격 : ‘원간섭기’와의 연속성을 중심으로
역사교육
2010 .12
-
한국에서의 몽골사 연구
인문과학연구
1993 .05
-
고려 대몽항쟁기 도환인(逃還人)의 유형과 강도조정(江都朝廷)의 도환인 활용
역사와현실
2012 .03
-
고려 원종대 이장용의 대몽 외교활동
한국인물사연구
2016 .03
-
즉위 초 쿠빌라이의 고려정책 : 그의 漢法 수용 문제와 관련하여
동양사학연구
2017 .12
-
東아시아 諸國의 13～14세기 歷史像과 민족주의
韓國史學史學報
2008 .01
-
恭愍王代후반 親明정책의 한 배경 : 몽골 복속기 권력구조에 대한 트라우마
사학연구
2014 .03
-
몽골 복속기 권력구조의 성립 : 元宗代 고려－몽골 관계와 권력구조의 변화
한국사연구
2013 .09
-
몽골 -고려 군사동맹 관계 : 양국관계를 조망하는 하나의 관점
역사와 담론
2018 .10
-
몽골제국의 붕괴와 고려-명의 유산 상속분쟁
역사비평
2017 .11
-
金坵의 反蒙活動과 仕宦生活
대구사학
2005 .01
-
THE MONGOL-TUNGUS CONNECTIONS
어학연구
1985 .06
-
운동-이미지와 운동의 통일성
철학사상
2008 .02
-
〈답사보고서〉 : 몽골의 민속문화
인문과학연구
1997 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0