메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국사학사학회 韓國史學史學報 韓國史學史學報 제18호
발행연도
2008.1
수록면
73 - 122 (50page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This essay critically reviews recent historical accounts of the Great Mongol Empire by historians in Japan, China, Korea and Mongolia. Its main theme is how their nationalistic accounts distort the salient features of the Yeke Mongol Ulus. Although nationalist historiography can contribute to national integration and nation building, especially of former colonies, it also instills expansionism. Recent revival of strong national sentiments in East Asia seems to make this issue more relevant. Japanese historians pioneered modern scholarship in Mongol history in the first half of the 20th century. They developed the framework of the Great Mongol Empire by releasing it from the narrow frame of the Yuan dynasty. In the second half, they enhanced their scholarship with archeological excavations and use of relevant historical literature in Persian. However, they seem to approach the Yuan from the Persian perspective, relegating this central Ulus to a regional one in East Asia. In the first half of the 20th century, Chinese historians actively studied the Mongol history, heavily relying on their historical records. Then there followed a long intermission caused by the Cultural Revolution. Since the 1980s, a new generation of historians revived Mongol historiography, but with a twist. They approach it from Chinese perspective, portraying the Yuan as a Chinese dynasty founded by an ethnic minority, not as part of the Yeke Mongol Ulus stretching all over Eurasia. Korean historians can be divided into two groups. In the last two decades or so, there emerged a handful of specialist in Mongol history, improving Korean scholarship remarkably. They regard the Great Mongol Empire as the history of all the ethnic groups involved, not as the monopoly of a particular nationality. Specialists in Korean history, on the other hand, are preoccupied with the Yuan-Koryo relations and show little interest in the unique Mongol system of ulus. In Mongolia itself, historiography changed over time. In the 1920s, men of letters pioneered national historiography in the wake of the socialist revolution, but they were purged in the 1930s. Since the 1950s, a new generation of Soviet- educated historians rewrote the Mongol history along socialist internationalism. Since the 1990's, the taboos on nationalism and the national hero Chinggis Khan were lifted, and we can see a surge of nationalist historiography and Chinggis Khan cult. However, it 'nationalized' the history of the Mongol steppes, sucking up all the activities of various ethnic groups there over two thousand yeast past.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (40)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0