지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2006.5
- 수록면
- 129 - 157 (29page)
- DOI
- 10.17068/lhc.2006.05.9.1.129
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The open ports and the concession system were the historical products of the imperialistic aggressions in East Asian countries. In the Korean peninsular, ten ports had been opened, and four concessions exclusive to the Japanese jurisdiction, three to the Chinese, and six for the joint control among several countries had been established between 1877 and 1908.
They were very important in several aspects during the Korean modern period, though they did not reflect the internal dynamics of Korean modernization. They were the paths where the new civilization was introduced, and they had directly experienced the emergence of modern cities in their Western sense.
The open ports and the concessions took the characteristics of modern cities not only in their economic roles, but also in their spatial organizations. For instance, they had the routes with the modern system and the architectures with the modern styles. In most of geographical and architectural studies, those modern characteristics in the spatial organization of the open ports seem to be regarded as the given. Though those works are important in understanding the modern features of the open ports, they are not enough to explain why the spatial organization becomes to represent the modernity. In order to explore the question, we need to distinguish the space into two different, but closely related categories: physical and cognitive. The physical space means the space which exists as a natural and geographical reality, and the cognitive means one that represents what the residents think and feel about the place where they live. Therefore, it is necessary to take those categories into account when we explain a space and/or a spatial organization in its comprehensive manner.
This paper aims to describe the processes in which a part of an open port got to represent the modernity and the other to do the traditionality on the basis of data gathered in one of the Korean open ports, Mokpo.
Mokpo was opened in October the Ist, 1897. In the traditional period. Mokpo was not so important geo-politically. But, after it was opened, it became the center of economic and political activities in the southwest area. It did not have spaces enough for the new settlements. and expanded its territory by reclaiming land from the sea. While Koreans inhabited in the old district in the city, the concessions were located on the reclaimed land, where well-designed routes and exotic buildings were built. The process of urbanization in Mokpo made two different districts, one of which was occupied by Koreans and the other by Japanese. And these two districts represented two different worlds: the former the traditionality and the latter the modernity.
The different meaning of each settlement, however, had been constructed by several means in addition to the structure of routes. First of all, the buildings with such new styles as the Neo-Baroque, the Renaissance, or the Eclectic were built in the Japanese settlement. To Koreans, most of whom lived in traditional houses, the buildings were exotic and were thought as something modern. Secondly, the functions of two districts were totally different. The Korean district was like a bed town, but the Japanese district was the center of various activities like administration, commerce, entertainment, etc. In other words, the Japanese district was the center where all kinds of modern activities were carried out. Therefore, most Koreans could experienced those activities that were though as modern. The last means was the place names. The Japanese district had Japanese place names, but the Korean district still had the Korean place names. The place names differentiate the two settlements symbolically.
The representation of modernity in Mokpo was made by several means in addition to the well-planned routes, which were the new styles of architectures, the functions of the Japanese district, and the place names. These means made the residents differentiate the city, and recognize the Japanese district as modern.
They were very important in several aspects during the Korean modern period, though they did not reflect the internal dynamics of Korean modernization. They were the paths where the new civilization was introduced, and they had directly experienced the emergence of modern cities in their Western sense.
The open ports and the concessions took the characteristics of modern cities not only in their economic roles, but also in their spatial organizations. For instance, they had the routes with the modern system and the architectures with the modern styles. In most of geographical and architectural studies, those modern characteristics in the spatial organization of the open ports seem to be regarded as the given. Though those works are important in understanding the modern features of the open ports, they are not enough to explain why the spatial organization becomes to represent the modernity. In order to explore the question, we need to distinguish the space into two different, but closely related categories: physical and cognitive. The physical space means the space which exists as a natural and geographical reality, and the cognitive means one that represents what the residents think and feel about the place where they live. Therefore, it is necessary to take those categories into account when we explain a space and/or a spatial organization in its comprehensive manner.
This paper aims to describe the processes in which a part of an open port got to represent the modernity and the other to do the traditionality on the basis of data gathered in one of the Korean open ports, Mokpo.
Mokpo was opened in October the Ist, 1897. In the traditional period. Mokpo was not so important geo-politically. But, after it was opened, it became the center of economic and political activities in the southwest area. It did not have spaces enough for the new settlements. and expanded its territory by reclaiming land from the sea. While Koreans inhabited in the old district in the city, the concessions were located on the reclaimed land, where well-designed routes and exotic buildings were built. The process of urbanization in Mokpo made two different districts, one of which was occupied by Koreans and the other by Japanese. And these two districts represented two different worlds: the former the traditionality and the latter the modernity.
The different meaning of each settlement, however, had been constructed by several means in addition to the structure of routes. First of all, the buildings with such new styles as the Neo-Baroque, the Renaissance, or the Eclectic were built in the Japanese settlement. To Koreans, most of whom lived in traditional houses, the buildings were exotic and were thought as something modern. Secondly, the functions of two districts were totally different. The Korean district was like a bed town, but the Japanese district was the center of various activities like administration, commerce, entertainment, etc. In other words, the Japanese district was the center where all kinds of modern activities were carried out. Therefore, most Koreans could experienced those activities that were though as modern. The last means was the place names. The Japanese district had Japanese place names, but the Korean district still had the Korean place names. The place names differentiate the two settlements symbolically.
The representation of modernity in Mokpo was made by several means in addition to the well-planned routes, which were the new styles of architectures, the functions of the Japanese district, and the place names. These means made the residents differentiate the city, and recognize the Japanese district as modern.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 이론적 검토
3. 목포 공간 조직의 변화
4. 공간의 차별화와 근대성의 인식
5. 맺음말
(Abstract)
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
근대도시 목포의 대중문화를 통해 본 식민지 근대성
지방사와 지방문화
2006 .05
-
개항 이후 서남바닷길의 성쇠와 대중매체 속 목포의 이미지
지방사와 지방문화
2016 .05
-
목포 개항장 상인층의 존재양태와 그 성격
지방사와 지방문화
2006 .05
-
부산항 일본인 거류지의 설치와 형성 : 개항 초기를 중심으로
도시연구
2010 .06
-
목포의 海港性과 개항장 형성과정의 특징
한국민족문화
2011 .03
-
Colonial Modernity and the Making of Modern Korean Cities
Korea Journal
2008 .09
-
Colonial Modernity and the Making of Mokpo as a Dual City
Korea Journal
2008 .09
-
The Opening of Korean Ports
Korea Journal
1969 .01
-
Modern Korean Novels
Korea Journal
1970 .06
-
‘租界’와 ‘居留地’ 사이 : 개항장 부산의 일본인 거주지를 둘러싼 조선과 일본의 입장 차이와 의미
한일관계사연구
2018 .11
-
일제강점기 한국인의 식민지 체험과 새로운 근대 기획
역사비평
2010 .02
-
근대일본문학의 시대적 상황과의 관련성에 대한 고찰
일본문화연구
2014 .01
-
포스트식민의 장소만들기 - 인천을 중심으로
도시인문학연구
2018 .01
-
最近世
역사학보
1987 .12
-
最近世
역사학보
1984 .12
-
最近世(開港~)
역사학보
1996 .12
-
最近世
역사학보
1990 .12
-
最近世(開港~)
역사학보
1993 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
한국 개항장의 외인관연구 (1) ( A Study on the Foreigners` Residential Buildings of an Open Port in Korea -Chemulpo-port )
김태영
,
이광노
대한건축학회 논문집
1988
.04
목포의 海港性과 개항장 형성과정의 특징
최성환
한국민족문화
2011
.03
근대도시 목포의 문화 전환과 식민지 근대성
고석규
역사문화학회 학술대회 발표자료집
2004
.11
공간구조의 비교를 통해 본 한국개항도시의 식민지적 성격 : 한국과 중국의 개항도시 비교를 중심으로
김주관
한국독립운동사연구
2012
.08
개항장과 공연예술
김양수
인천학연구
2002
.12
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0