지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this paper is to suggest a possibility of a new conceptual view on the 'agglutinativity' of Korean nomial additives.
Korean is classified as one of agglutinative languages. Nevertheless, the concept of 'agglutinativity' remains to be subtle. Because almost preceding studies described the phenomenal discriminations between agglutination and inflection. Therefore there may be a need to invest what the agglutinative properties of Korean are. This paper, especially, invests some agglutinative properties of nominal additives in contrast with some properties of German declension.
At first, it is suggested that Korean nominal additives have the meaningfulness which is different from the inflectional forms. Korean nominal additives show stronger meaningful than inflectional forms. This holds on though the correspondence between Korean nominal additives and its idea is not a one-to-one correspondence. Because Korean nominal additives have more stronger meaningfulness than inflectional elements Then we had classified three kinds of grammaticsl sub-semantic types in Korean nominal additives: grammatical function, meaningful function, grammatic-meaningful mixed function.
And Korean nominal additives need not a additional system for interpreting the meaning of a certain grammatical form in different way of inflectional languages. It is not important that Korean nominal additive has what kind of sub-semantic type. Because it has the categorial unity. Contrastively, a grammar of inflection needs the interpreting paradigm such as in Figure 13 which is called category-complex system. The system is a kind of syntactic device for interpreting the meanings of from phreses to sentence. The grammatical meanings of inflectional forms are olny to be in the zone of the grammatical function. In inflectional language like German, grammatical meanings, such like case, are represented by category-complex system.
So, we are able to conclude that the grammatical phenomena related to Korean nominal additives are based on the semantic representing system which has categorial unity. Such grammar represents the grammatical meaning in direct by grammatic units. This is one property of agglutinative grammar such like Korean nominal additives. So we could understand the category-individual representativity is the property of Korean grammar itself.
So it may be understood that the concept of agglutinativity has to be extended to the level of the grammar systemic dimension in relation to agglutinative languages.
Korean is classified as one of agglutinative languages. Nevertheless, the concept of 'agglutinativity' remains to be subtle. Because almost preceding studies described the phenomenal discriminations between agglutination and inflection. Therefore there may be a need to invest what the agglutinative properties of Korean are. This paper, especially, invests some agglutinative properties of nominal additives in contrast with some properties of German declension.
At first, it is suggested that Korean nominal additives have the meaningfulness which is different from the inflectional forms. Korean nominal additives show stronger meaningful than inflectional forms. This holds on though the correspondence between Korean nominal additives and its idea is not a one-to-one correspondence. Because Korean nominal additives have more stronger meaningfulness than inflectional elements Then we had classified three kinds of grammaticsl sub-semantic types in Korean nominal additives: grammatical function, meaningful function, grammatic-meaningful mixed function.
And Korean nominal additives need not a additional system for interpreting the meaning of a certain grammatical form in different way of inflectional languages. It is not important that Korean nominal additive has what kind of sub-semantic type. Because it has the categorial unity. Contrastively, a grammar of inflection needs the interpreting paradigm such as in Figure 13 which is called category-complex system. The system is a kind of syntactic device for interpreting the meanings of from phreses to sentence. The grammatical meanings of inflectional forms are olny to be in the zone of the grammatical function. In inflectional language like German, grammatical meanings, such like case, are represented by category-complex system.
So, we are able to conclude that the grammatical phenomena related to Korean nominal additives are based on the semantic representing system which has categorial unity. Such grammar represents the grammatical meaning in direct by grammatic units. This is one property of agglutinative grammar such like Korean nominal additives. So we could understand the category-individual representativity is the property of Korean grammar itself.
So it may be understood that the concept of agglutinativity has to be extended to the level of the grammar systemic dimension in relation to agglutinative languages.
목차
1. 서론
2. 기존의 ‘교착성‘ 인식
3. 조사의 내적 특성
4. 조사의 교착성
5. 결론 및 남은 문제
참고문헌
참고문헌 (30)
참고문헌 신청
1. [단행본] - 고석주 / 2004 / 현대 한국어 조사의 연구 Ⅰ: ‘격 개념’과 조사 ‘-가’와 ‘-를’을 중심으로 / 한국문화사
2. [단행본] - 고영근 / 2001 / 역대한국문법대계 / 서울대학교출판부
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 고창수 / 1985 / 어간형성접미사의 설정에 대하여 / 한국어학연구 (7)
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 고창수 / 1992 / 국어의 통사적 어형성 / 국어학 22 : 259 ~ 269
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 권재일 / 1986 / 문법범주의 실현 방법과 국어의 특징 / 배달발 11 : 43 ~ 65
2. [단행본] - 고영근 / 2001 / 역대한국문법대계 / 서울대학교출판부
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 고창수 / 1985 / 어간형성접미사의 설정에 대하여 / 한국어학연구 (7)
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 고창수 / 1992 / 국어의 통사적 어형성 / 국어학 22 : 259 ~ 269
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 권재일 / 1986 / 문법범주의 실현 방법과 국어의 특징 / 배달발 11 : 43 ~ 65
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
1960년대 이전의 문법에 반영된 한국어 교착성 인식의 변화 양상
어문학
2012 .09
-
Formatives in Korean : Their semantic and syntactic characteristics
언어학
2012 .08
-
‘-음’과 ‘-기’의 문법 범주에 대한 일고찰
어문연구
2010 .01
-
교착소로서의 국어 어미에 대한 연구
우리말글
2005 .12
-
격조사 없는 명사구의 격 문제에 대하여
어문학
2006 .09
-
Optimal paradigms in Korean nominal inflection
음성음운형태론연구
2002 .12
-
한국어 문법의 체계와 교육내용 구축 방안
이중언어학
2007 .01
-
한국어 “교착” 현상에 대한 연구 : 러시아어 굴절과 비교하여
언어학
2009 .12
-
한국어의 교착성과 교착소 중심의 문법
어문학
2014 .03
-
국어 어미 연구의 나아가야 할 방향
한국어학
2002 .08
-
한국어교육 문법 요소 선정 연구-시제법을 중심으로-
한말연구
2018 .01
-
Layered Nominal Structures : Implications for Caseless Nominals
언어
2006 .06
-
한국어 문장 구조 교육을 위한 문법 항목 선정과 등급화
어문론집
2012 .12
-
한국어 문법의 특징과 체계의 문제점에 대한 연구
국어문학
2009 .08
-
러시아어, 체코어 그리고 폴란드어에 있어서 행위명사화형(action nominal)의 특성들
슬라브학보
2002 .06
-
Typological Accounts for Nominal Forms
Journal of Universal Language
2012 .03
-
Categories and Features in Gerundive Nominals
생성문법연구
2003 .01
-
한국어의 명사 확장범주
언어
2006 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0